Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,799,441 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Appeals Court decision could be boon for certain pre-1977 joint property.


Mrs. Gallenstein and her husband bought farm land in 1955 for $38,500. All of the purchase price came from Mr. Gallenstein's earnings. The property was held jointly with right of survivorship The power of the successor or successors of a deceased individual to acquire the property of that individual upon his or her death; a distinguishing feature of Joint Tenancy. . In 1987, Mr. Gallenstein died and Mrs. Gallenstein inherited inherited

received by inheritance.


inherited achondroplastic dwarfism
see achondroplastic dwarfism.

inherited combined immunodeficiency
see combined immune deficiency syndrome (disease).
 the farm and became it's only owner.

In 1988, Mrs. Gallenstein sold part of the farm property for about $3.6 million. She claimed her adjusted cost basis in the property also was $3.6 million and therefore there was no realized capital gain on the sale.

Mrs. Gallenstein arrived at the $3.6 million basis in the property as follows: Mr. Gallenstein's estate, via an amended estate tax return, included 100% of the farm property's value in his gross estate; Mrs. Gallenstein therefore was entitled en·ti·tle  
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.

2. To furnish with a right or claim to something:
 to a stepped-up, date-of-death-value cost basis in the property under Internal Revenue Code The Internal Revenue Code is the body of law that codifies all federal tax laws, including income, estate, gift, excise, alcohol, tobacco, and employment taxes. These laws constitute title 26 of the U.S. Code (26 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.  section 1014.

The dispute here was whether 50% or 100% of the property should be included in Mr. Gallenstein's gross estate.

Result: For Mrs. Gallenstein. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a complex question of statutory construction, which dealt with the effective date of amendments to IRC (Internet Relay Chat) Computer conferencing on the Internet. There are hundreds of IRC channels on numerous subjects that are hosted on IRC servers around the world. After joining a channel, your messages are broadcast to everyone listening to that channel.  section 2040 (inclusion of joint interests for estate tax purposes), in the taxpayer's favor.

As a result of the court's decision, if a spousal spou·sal  
adj.
1. Of or relating to marriage; nuptial.

2. Of or relating to a spouse.

n.
Marriage; nuptials. Often used in the plural.
 joint interest was created before 1977, 100% of that interest is included in the estate of the first spouse to die if that spouse provided the entire consideration for the property. Of course, the court's decision is binding only in the Sixth Circuit.

* Gallenstein (6th Cir., 1992).
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Dec 1, 1992
Words:259
Previous Article:More returns examined last year. (Brief Article)
Next Article:Polygraph results not allowed as evidence in Tax Court. (Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Appeals court allows 100% stepped-up basis for pre-1977 spousal joint property. (Brief Article)
MICROSOFT COURT EXPANDS REPLIES - WITH APPEALS IN MIND.(Company Business and Marketing)
Government clarifies position on investigatory costs.(pretransaction costs)
CITY WEIGHS IN ON LONG BEACH CASE U.S. SUPREME COURT ASKED TO UPHOLD ZONING LIMITS ON ADULT ENTERTAINMENT.(News)
Spousal joint tenancies: different rules apply to post-1976 and pre-1977 tenancies. (Federal Tax).(Brief Article)
A question of coverage: California clarifies the ability of corporations to obtain coverage from policies issued to predecessor corporations.(Legal...
Wine ruling a setback for consumers.(Brief Article)
Related-party like-kind exchanges.
Michigan sales tax does not apply to property sold incidental to a service.
Charlotte Cuno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., et al., Defendants-Appellees: on appeal from the United States District Court...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles