Appeals Court Upholds Jury Verdict Against Polaris.MINNEAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 14, 1998-- Company Says Payment of Damage and Interest Award Will Not Affect Ongoing Operations Polaris Industries Inc. today announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the "Court") late Thursday upheld a Colorado District Court jury verdict on a trade secret misappropriation misappropriation n. the intentional, illegal use of the property or funds of another person for one's own use or other unauthorized purpose, particularly by a public official, a trustee of a trust, an executor or administrator of a dead person's estate, or by any claim brought by Injection Research Specialties Inc. against Polaris Industries Inc. (NYSE NYSE See: New York Stock Exchange :PII See Pentium II. ). The court affirmed the jury's award of $34 million in damages against Polaris and remanded the case to the lower court for the calculation of prejudgment pre·judge tr.v. pre·judged, pre·judg·ing, pre·judg·es To judge beforehand without possessing adequate evidence. pre·judg interest. "We are very disappointed in the court's decision and will weigh our legal options for further appeal," said W. Hall Wendel, Polaris chairman and chief executive officer. "Should the verdict stand, our strong financial position, cash flow from operations Cash flow from operations A firm's net cash inflow resulting directly from its regular operations (disregarding extraordinary items such as the sale of fixed assets or transaction costs associated with issuing securities), calculated as the sum of net income plus noncash expenses and overall liquidity will enable us to pay the amounts awarded to the plaintiff without affecting our ongoing operations. "We have a strong balance sheet, only $20 million in long-term debt Long-Term Debt Loans and financial obligations lasting over one year. Notes: For example debts obligations such as bonds and notes which have maturities greater than one year would be considered long-term debt. as of June 30, 1998, and generated cash flow from operations of more than $100 million in 1997. Our debt-to-total capital ratio at June 30, 1998 was just 10%. So we have ample borrowing capacity to make the award payment and continue to fund ongoing operations." The company said it will account for the damage and interest award as a provision for litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. loss as a component of non-operating expenses on its Statements of Operations in the quarter ending Sept. 30, 1998. As a result, the company will report a net loss for the third quarter, 1998. Income from operations is unaffected by the provision for litigation loss. Wendel added that none of the technology in dispute in this trade secrets matter is used in any current Polaris products and that the appellate court's decision will not impede the company's ability to offer any of its current or planned products, nor its ability to continue to invest in new product development. Polaris Industries Inc. designs, engineers, manufactures and markets snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles, motorcycles and personal watercraft for recreational and utility use. Polaris is the world's largest snowmobile manufacturer and one of the largest U.S. manufacturers of ATV's and personal watercraft. Polaris Industries Inc. trades on the New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) World's largest marketplace for securities. The exchange began as an informal meeting of 24 men in 1792 on what is now Wall Street in New York City. and the Pacific Stock Exchange under the symbol "PII" and is included in the S&P SmallCap 600 stock price index.
CONTACT: Polaris Industries Inc., Minneapolis
Michael Malone, 612/542-0500
or
Shandwick, Minneapolis
Dave Mona, 612/832-5000
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion