Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,815,393 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Apes, monkeys split earlier than fossils had indicated.


The evolutionary precursors of modern apes and people diverged from ancient monkeys between 29 million and 34.5 million years ago, a new genetic analysis concludes. This evolutionary parting of the ways had previously been placed at between 23 million and 25 million years ago.

Michael E. Steiper of Hunter College of the City University of New York The City University of New York (CUNY; acronym: IPA pronunciation: [kjuni]), is the public university system of New York City.  and his colleagues first consulted the latest fossil evidence to estimate that the human evolutionary family separated from chimps' ancestors between 6 million and 7 million years ago, while the macaque macaque (məkäk`), name for Old World monkeys of the genus Macaca, related to mangabeys, mandrills, and baboons. All but one of the 19 species are found in Asia from Afghanistan to Japan, the Philippines, and Borneo.  monkey lineage diverged from its baboon baboon, any of the large, powerful, ground-living monkeys of the genus Papio, also called dog-faced monkeys. Five subspecies live in Africa, with one species extending into the Arabian peninsula.  ancestors between 5 million and 7 million years ago.

The researchers used the timing of these splits to calibrate rates of genetic evolution for apes and monkeys. They then employed a computerized technique to identify and compare similar sequences cover roughly 150,000 basic components of DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
 from people, chimps, macaques, and baboons. These data yielded the team's revised age estimate for the ape-monkey split.

Because the oldest-known ape fossils date to no more than 25 million years ago, scientists will need to confirm the new genetic portrait with finds of yet older fossils, the researchers note. Their report appears in the Dec. 7, 2004 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, usually referred to as PNAS, is the official journal of the United States National Academy of Sciences. .
COPYRIGHT 2005 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Anthropology
Author:Bower, Bruce
Publication:Science News
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jan 1, 2005
Words:207
Previous Article:Alpine glaciers on a hasty retreat.(Earth Science)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Paper wasps object to dishonest face spots.(Biology)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
A common ancestor of higher primates? (Amphipithecus mogaungensis)
Monkeying with Proconsul's hip. (fossil ape)
Erectus unhinged. (debates over human ancestors) (Cover Story)
Asian fossils reveal primate evolution.(Brief Article)
Kansas GOP Voters Remove Creationists From School Board.(Brief Article)
Out on a Limb.(evolutionary trees)
Anti-Evolution Bill Fails In Close Vote In Arkansas House.(Brief Article)
Older ancestors: primate origins age in new analysis. (This Week).(Brief Article)
Anklebone kicks up primate debate.(Anthropology)(primate evolution theory)(Brief Article)
DNA puts Neandertals on edge of human ancestry.(Prehistoric Family Split)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles