Antioxidants: surprise, surprise.Science is full of surprises. There's no other way to explain it. Cancer, heart disease, cataracts and other eye disease...every time you picked up the paper, another killer had reportedly been vanquished by antioxidants Antioxidants Substances that reduce the damage of the highly reactive free radicals that are the byproducts of the cells. Mentioned in: Aging, Nutritional Supplements antioxidants, n. . Over the last few years, sales of vitamin E vitamin E or tocopherol Fat-soluble organic compound found principally in certain plant oils and leaves of green vegetables. Vitamin E acts as an antioxidant in body tissues and may prolong life by slowing oxidative destruction of membranes. and betacarotene soared. Even Nutrition Action Healthletter suggested that people consider taking them. Until April 14, 1994. That's when researchers from Finland and the National Cancer Institute dropped a double-whammy: Not only did beta-carotene and vitamin E supplements fail to reduce the risk of lung cancer lung cancer, cancer that originates in the tissues of the lungs. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States in both men and women. Like other cancers, lung cancer occurs after repeated insults to the genetic material of the cell. , they might cause harm. "It was totally unexpected," says Charles Hennekens, the Harvard School of Public Health The Harvard School of Public Health is (colloquially, HSPH) is one of the professional graduate schools of Harvard University. Located in Longwood Area of the Boston, Massachusetts neighborhood of Mission Hill, next to Harvard Medical School and Cambridge, Massachusetts, researcher who co-authored an editorial that accompanied the study in The New England Journal of Medicine The New England Journal of Medicine (New Engl J Med or NEJM) is an English-language peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Massachusetts Medical Society. It is one of the most popular and widely-read peer-reviewed general medical journals in the world. .(1) In the study, researchers randomly divided 29,000 Finnish male smokers into groups that got one of the following every day: * a dummy pill, * beta-carotene (20 mg, or 33,333 IU), * vitamin E (50 mg, or 50 IU), or * beta-carotene and vitamin E. After five to eight years, the beta-carotene-takers had an 18 percent higher incidence of lung cancer. There were also hints that beta-carotene might have raised the risk of heart disease. Vitamin E appeared to reduce the risk of prostate cancer prostate cancer, cancer originating in the prostate gland. Prostate cancer is the leading malignancy in men in the United States and is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death in men. but increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke hemorrhagic stroke Neurology An ischemic stroke in which blood enters necrotic brain tissue, which may not be accompanied by a worsening clinical status Risks for HS Hemophilia, thrombocytopenia, sickle cell anemia, DIC, anticoagulants, HTN. See Stroke. . That's the news. Here's the news behind the news. * This isn't just another study. Earlier studies "observed" lower cancer rates among people who eat fruits and vegetables that are rich in beta-carotene. But observational studies--no matter how many--have a built-in limitation. "If fruits and vegetables exert a protective effect by a mechanism that does not involve beta-carotene, then high levels of beta-carotene in the diet or in the blood would appear to be protective, but beta-carotene supplements would provide no benefits," wrote Hennekens. The Finnish trial provides far more powerful evidence, because it was the first to actually give well-nourished people either antioxidants or a placebo and then wait to see who got cancer. And don't be swayed by supplement-industry claims that the Finnish study doesn't count because it only looked at smokers. "Many of the observational studies observational studies, n.pl an investigational method involving description of the associations be-tween interventions and outcomes. Outcomes research and practice audits are examples of this investigational method. have shown a reduced risk of lung cancer in smokers," says Regina Ziegler, a nutritional epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute (NCI See Liberate. ). * This isn't the final word. Even a well-designed trial doesn't prove or disprove the benefits of antioxidants. Certainly, the Finnish trial is inconclusive about vitamin E's purported ability to reduce the risk of heart disease. The men took only 50 mg (IU) a day. Earlier studies suggest that it might take at least 100 mg a day to lower the risk. We'll have to wait for the results of about a dozen ongoing trials to settle the question. So, until then: 1. Shelve shelve v. shelved, shelv·ing, shelves v.tr. 1. To place or arrange on a shelf. 2. the beta-carotene. For now, hold off on taking more than about 3 mg (5,000 IU) a day. That's what's in most multivitamins. The most cautious approach would be to take none. How could beta-Carotene supplements be harmful? Foods contain several forms of beta-carotene. Supplements contain only one. "It's conceivable that large amounts of a single form could interfere with the absorption, transport, or utilization of other forms of beta-carotene, other carotenoids Carotenoids Carotenoids are yellow to deep-red pigments. Mentioned in: Vitamin A Deficiency carotenoids (k , or other important compounds in fruits and vegetables," speculates NCI's Ziegler. There's also a tiny chance--less than one percent--that the Finnish results were simply a fluke. But last month, Nutrition Action learned that investigator Robert McLennan called off his trial at the Queensland Institute of Medical Research The Queensland Institute of Medical Research (QIMR) is one of the largest medical research institutes in the southern hemisphere, and is recognised worldwide for the quality of its research. QIMR was established in 1945 by the State Government in Queensland. in Australia after he found that people taking beta-carotene had developed 40 percent more precancerous polyps of the colon. The results are ambiguous, though, and they haven't been published. 2. Reconsider taking vitamin E. The Finnish study hinted that it might increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke, even at the low dose of 50 mg a day. While most strokes in the U.S. are due to hemorrhage, it's not a trivial problem. The most cautious approach would be to take none, though 30 mg--the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowance--is likely to be safe. Since earlier studies suggest that 100 mg a day may protect against heart disease, there's certainly no reason to exceed that dose. 3. Don't stop eating fruits and vegetables. There is no--repeat, no--reason to worry about the beta-carotene in foods. People who eat more fruits and vegetables, especially those rich in carotenes, have a lower risk of most cancers. (1)New England Journal of Medicine 330: 1029, 1080, 1994. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion