Antimicrobial resistance incidence and risk factors among Helicobacter pylori-infected persons, United States.

Helicobacter pylori is the primary cause of peptic ulcer disease and an etiologic agent in the development of gastric cancer. H. pylori infection is curable with regimens of multiple antimicrobial agents, and antimicrobial resistance is a leading cause of treatment failure. The Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Program (HARP) is a prospective, multicenter U.S. network that tracks national incidence rates of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance. Of 347 clinical H. pylori isolates collected from December 1998 through 2002, 101 (29.1%) were resistant to one antimicrobial agent, and 17 (5%) were resistant to two or more antimicrobial agents. Eighty-seven (25.1%) isolates were resistant to metronidazole, 45 (12.9%) to clarithromycin, and 3 (0.9%) to amoxicillin. On multivariate analysis, black race was the only significant risk factor (p < 0.01, hazard ratio 2.04) for infection with a resistant H. pylori strain. Formulating pretreatment screening strategies or providing alternative therapeutic regimens for high-risk populations may be important for future clinical practice.

**********

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide is approximately 50% (1), as high as 80%-90% in developing countries, and [approximately equal to] 35%-40% in the United States (1). Approximately 20% of persons infected with H. pylori develop related gastroduodenal disorders during their lifetime (1). H. pylori is an etiologic agent of peptic ulcer disease, primary gastritis, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid-tissue lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma (2). The annual incidence of H. pylori infection is [approximately equal to] 4%-15% in developing countries, compared with approximately 0.5% in industrialized countries (3). Documented risk factors include low socioeconomic status, overcrowding, poor sanitation or hygiene, and living in a developing country (2).

Eradication therapy of symptomatic IL pylori infection substantially reduces the recurrence of associated gastroduodenal diseases. Therapy entails complicated regimens of several antimicrobial agents for at least 2 weeks. In general, triple therapy regimens usually entail two of the following antimicrobial agents: metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline, or clarithromycin in combination with a proton pump inhibitor or bismuth (4). The most common causes of treatment failure are patient noncompliance and antimicrobial resistance of the infecting H. pylori strain (5). Quadruple regimens are used as a salvage therapy when triple therapy regimens have failed (4). Pretreatment resistance of H. pylori bas been reported to compromise the efficacy of treatment. For example, therapy regimens containing metronidazole and clarithromycin fail in as many as 38% and 55% of cases, respectively, when used to treat infection with an organism resistant to one of these antimicrobial agents (6). In addition, published data are lacking that describe the effect conferred by polymicrobial resistance on eradication success.

The Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Project (HARP) is a prospective, longitudinal network monitoring ongoing national and regional trends of antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori isolates in the United States. The network is positioned to document emerging resistance and to assist physicians in formulating therapy recommendations. We present the results of the antimicrobial resistance monitoring and risk factor analysis from data collected prospectively from 1998 through 2002.

Materials and Methods

During the course of the study, HARP consisted of 11 hospital study sites across the United States. The first five patients who sought treatment each month for esophagogastro duodenal endoscopy (EGD) as part of treatment for H. pylori infection, confirmed by gastric biopsy, were enrolled at each site. When fewer than five eligible study participants were seen at a study center, those eligible were enrolled. Written, signed consent was obtained from all participants or their guardians. Culture of biopsied material for H. pylori was performed at the study site or at the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Hospital. If primary isolation was performed at the HARP study site, isolates were placed in trypticase soy broth (TSB) supplemented with glycerol and stored at -70[degrees]C. Isolates were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for antimicrobial resistance testing. Samples forwarded to the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Hospital for isolation were packed in 6 pounds of dry ice and maintained at 70[pounds sterling]C to 80[degrees]C until cultured (up to 1 month). Each specimen was accompanied by a standard case report form containing 145 variables of demographic, clinical, and epidemiologic information.

Laboratory Procedures

Isolates were cultured on heart infusion agar (HIA) with 5% rabbit blood at 37[degrees]C in a microaerobic atmosphere (10% C[O.sub.2], 85% [N.sub.2], 5% [O.sub.2]) for a minimum of 72 hours or until appearance of H. pylori colonies. Gastric biopsy specimens were homogenized by using a micropestle in a microcentrifuge tube, and the homogenates were added to HIA with 5% rabbit's blood and Skirrow media and incubated at 37[degrees]C microaerobically for up to 2 weeks. Presumptive H. pylori colonics were subcultured for further testing. Isolates were confirmed as H. pylori if they demonstrated typical morphologic features by dark-field microscopy and if urease, oxidase, and catalase activities were detected. Also, a polymerase chain reaction amplification assay that used primers targeted at the ureA gene provided confirmation (7). Antimierobial susceptibility testing was performed by the agar dilution method in accordance with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) protocols, except that defibrinated rabbit blood was used instead of aged sheep blood (8). For antimicrobial agents without an NCCLS-recommended breakpoint, breakpoints were selected after a review of the literature.

Data Collection and Analysis

Case report forms and laboratory data were entered into a MS Access 2000 database and analyzed by using SAS, version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We defined a resistant case to be an HARP isolate that demonstrated any detectable resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, tetracycline, or amoxicillin. HARP study sites were assigned to the following four regions: Northeast (Washington, DC; New York, NY; and Philadelphia, PA), South (Atlanta, GA; Nashville, TN; and Galveston, TX), Midwest (Detroit, MI; Cleveland, OH; Indianapolis, IN; and Milwaukee, WI), and West (Palo Alto, CA). Differences between patients infected with resistant and susceptible strains of H. pylori were assessed by using the Fisher exact test, Mantel-Haenszel chi-square, or Student t test, as appropriate. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine antimicrobial resistance rate trends for clarithromycin and metronidazole. When the difference in the number of study participants that harbored a resistant H. pylori infection and those who did not for a given risk factor was [less than or equal to] 2, we chose to exclude the risk factor from further analysis because of the possibility of arriving at a spurious association caused by small cell-size variations. This method enhanced the statistical reliability of all possible exposure and resistance associations considered for multivariate modeling. Risk factors that met these criteria were subjected to a chi-square score model selection procedure to obtain the most significant and stable multivariate model. Multivariate analyses were performed by using logistic regression to assess the independent association of identified risk factors with any detectable antimicrobial resistance using two different models.

The first logistic regression model assessed significant univariate risk factors for antimicrobial resistance. A second logistic regression model was created that we conditioned on geographic location of HARP site, previous antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori infection, and antacid use to resolve colinearity issues with race.

Results

Of 317 enrolled HARP study participants for whom complete demographic information was available, 205 (65%) were male, 116 (37%) were white, 172 (54%) were black, 14 (4%) were Asian, 3 (1%) were Native American, and 12 (4%) were of other ethnic backgrounds. The median age was 57 years (range 3-94 years). Among males, 97 (31%) were white, 90 (28%) were black, and 9 (3%) were Asian, 1 (0.3%) was Native American, and 8 (3%) were of other ethnic backgrounds. Among females, 19 (6%) were white, 82 (26%) were black, 5 (2%) were Asian, 2 (0.6%) were Native American, and 4 (1%) were of other ethnic backgrounds. The most common endoscopic diagnoses for conditions of HARP participants were gastric erosions, gastritis, duodenal and gastric ulcers, and esophagitis (Table 1). H. pylori resistance was not statistically associated with endoscopic findings.

Among 347 H. pylori isolates submitted to HARP from 1998 to 2002, 118 (34%) were resistant to [greater than or equal to] 1 antimicrobial agent, 101 (29%) H. pylori isolates were resistant to one agent only, and 17 (5%) H. pylori isolates were resistant to more than one antimicrobial agent. Three isolates were resistant to amoxicillin (1%), 45 were resistant to clarithromycin (13%), 87 were resistant to metronidazole (25%), and no isolate was found to be resistant to tetracycline. Multiple-agent resistance was observed for clarithromycin and amoxicillin (1 isolate, 0.3%) and clarithromycin and metronidazole (16 isolates, 5%). A test of trend showed no significant trend for resistance to metronidazole, but a significant trend ([R.sup.2] = 0.76) was noted for a decline in resistance to clarithromycin during the study period (Figure).

[FIGURE OMITTED]

Most isolates were submitted by centers in the Northeast region, followed by the South, Midwest, and the West. Submitted H. pylori isolates from the Northeast region had the highest frequency of single- and dual-agent resistance (Table 2). The Midwest region submitted H pylori isolates with the second-highest single agent resistance rate, while the southern region had the second-highest dual agent resistance rate. The highest proportion of H. pylori isolates resistant to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin was in the Northeast (Table 2).

The four sites reporting the highest proportion of isolates resistant to one agent were Indianapolis, Indiana; Galveston, Texas; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Washington, DC (Table 3). Dual agent resistance was most prevalent in Detroit, Michigan. Indianapolis had the highest overall resistance: 50% of all isolates submitted were resistant to at least one agent. The Atlanta site reported the highest proportion of clarithromycin-resistant isolates (Table 3). The highest proportion of metronidazole resistance was reported from the Indianapolis site. Isolates resistant to amoxicillin were found in Nashville, Tennessee, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC.

Demographic, clinical, and epidemiologic data were analyzed for association with infection by a resistant H. pylori strain. Results of univariate analysis of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance are summarized in Table 4. On univariate analysis, significant risk factors for H. pylori resistance included past treatment of H. pylori infection with clarithromycin, treatment of past H. pylori infection for a second time in the past 5 years, treatment of past H. pylori infection with clarithromycin more than once, and treatment of past H. pylori infection with a proton pump inhibitor more than once. No protective factors for resistant H. pylori resistance approached significance.

On multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for H. pylori resistance was previous treatment of H. pylori infection within the past 5 years (Table 5). Protective factors for H. pylori infection were treatment with an antacid (Mylanta) and submission of specimens from New York, Palo Alto, California, Atlanta, or Nashville. However, a high degree of colinearity was found between geographic location and race in this model. For example, 84% of Washington, DC, participants were black, compared to 20% of participants from Nashville. Accordingly, a second multivariate model was constructed in which geographic location was controlled by conditioning. In this model, black race was the only risk factor significantly associated with infection with a resistant H. pylori strain (Table 6).

Discussion

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in H. pylori represents a serious public health challenge because of the prevalence of infection and incidence of severe sequelae. A 12-fold increase in resistance to antimicrobial agents such as clarithromycin has been documented in cases in which antimicrobial therapy regimens do not eliminate H. pylori (9). Once resistance to clarithromycin appears, cross-resistance to all other macrolides also occurs, which eliminates the potential for their use in salvage therapies. In the past 5 years, amoxicillin and tetracycline resistance has also been described (6,10).

H. pylori resistance is amply documented in a variety of study populations. However, most published studies have been based on cross-sectional designs, not prospective population-based surveillance of resistance. A meta-analysis of 20 nationwide clinical trials estimated H. pylori resistance to clarithrmnycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin to be 10.1%, 36.9%, and 1.4%, respectively (6). These findings were also reflected in smaller single-site studies (11). Resistance rates may be higher in pediatric populations; for example, a study in Michigan demonstrated that clarithromycin resistance in pediatric H. pylori strains was 2.5 times higher than that reported in adults in the same region and elsewhere in the United States (12).

Single-site and multicenter surveillance network studies in Britain, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Turkey, Greece, Poland, Russia, Slovenia, Turkey, Estonia, Italy, Bulgaria, Germany, and Belgium have observed primary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance with rates as high as 40.3% and 10.6%, respectively (13-17). A large prospective surveillance project in northeastern Germany showed primary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance rates of 26.2% and 2.2%, respectively, in 1,644 clinical H. pylori isolates collected from 1995 to 2000 (17). High resistance rates to metronidazole and clarithromycin have been reported in Portugal, Brazil, Hong Kong, Saudia Arabia, and Lebanon (18 22). Overall, H. pylori resistance to metronidazole among single and multicenter surveillance networks is greater than all other resistant antimicrobial agents combined.

HARP is the only multicenter network providing ongoing prospective antimicrobial resistance and associated risk factor data for H. pylori in North America. The first 4 years of data show that resistance to antimicrobial drugs commonly used to treat H. pylori infections is widespread, though rates varied from year to year; this finding was true for both clarithromycin and metronidazole. We speculate that the precipitous decrease in metronidazole resistance in 2002 could be attributed to the reduction in isolates rcceived by HARP, which limited the power and representiveness of our sample.

We performed a two-phased multivariate analysis on risk factors significantly associated with resistance on univariate analysis. In the first-phase, multivariate model, antimicrobial resistance was significantly associated with previous antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori, and antacid use was protective. However, in this model, geographic location was highly collinear with race, which necessitated the second-phase multivariate model, in which the contribution of race was assessed by conditioning on geographic location, previous antimicrobial treatment for H. pylori infection, and antacid use. This model clearly demonstrated an association between black race and infection with an antimicrobial-resistant H. pylori. This association may indicate persistent transmission of resistant strains or in vivo induction of resistance. The association between H. pylori infection and blacks in the United States has been amply documented (2,3). However, the association between incidence of H. pylori resistance and black race is new. The biologically plausible association between previous antimicrobial use and resistance approached significance in the second-phase model; however, many study participants could not recall whether they were previously treated. This model does not rule out an independent association between geographic location and resistance. Enrollment of additional participants in HARP may sufficiently enhance the statistical power of the study to show such an association, while enrollment in sites serving a more racially diverse population may help clarify the contributions of geographic location as a risk factor for resistant infection.

This study has several limitations. While drawn from various regions in the continental United States, the 11 HARP sites represent a convenience sample of academic medical centers that is not truly representative of the U.S. population. Some participating sites enrolled more patients per month than others, so that cumulative data are biased towards individual study sites. Most of the participating hospital sites serve adult populations, and thus the results largely reflect resistance incidence towards adult patients. Patients undergoing endoscopy for H. pylori-related illness constitute a minority of infected persons, whose clinical condition and H. pylori-resistance status may not be representative of the total population with underlying H. pylori infection. Although this trend has not been documented, many public health analysts suspect that the proportion of H. pylori infections diagnosed and treated in academic medical centers is decreasing compared with those in community practices. We suspect that this trend may have accounted for the reduced number of isolates submitted to HARP over time. Although these limitations primarily affected our sample size and how the sample represented the population, they did not invalidate the epidemiologic significance of the results generated from this study.

Given the limited population-based surveillance data on H. pylori resistance, HARP offers the best available data on H. pylori resistance in the United States. The accuracy and usefulness of this prospective, multicenter network can be enhanced in a number of ways. Increasing the number of HARP sites will improve geographic and demographic representation. Given the fact that only 12 study participants < 12 years of age were included, enrollment of pediatric-care sites will improve the age representation of the HARP cohort. This feature is particularly important considering the increasing number of reports that describe higher resistance rates in pediatric strains compared to those isolated from adults, particularly resistance to macrolides (12,23). Enrolling study participants in community practices will provide data on resistance rates in H. pylori isolates from infected persons not treated at academic medical centers, a population in which resistance rates in H. pylori are unknown and may differ significantly from the current HARP cohort. Future HARP findings may serve as the basis for specific therapeutic recommendations and pretreatment antimicrobial susceptibility testing in high-risk populations.

In summary, we have shown that antimicrobial resistance in clinical H. pylori isolates is extensive, that it varies from year to year, and that resistant isolates are more common among blacks. Ongoing, prospective surveillance of H. pylori resistance is essential to ensure that appropriate data are available to guide the choice of therapy, particularly in high-risk populations.

Table 1. Endoscopy findings on patients enrolled in the
Helicobacterpylon Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Project,
1998-2002 (a)

Endoscopic diagnosis    No. of patients (%)

Stomach erosion              88 (27.0)
Gastritis                    36 (11.0)
Duodenal ulcers              26 (8.0)
Esophagitis                  26 (8.0)
Gastric ulcer                26 (8.0)
Duodenal erosion             24 (7.0)
Barrett esophagus             9 (3.0)
Nodularity                    8 (2.0)
Stomach tumor                 4 (1.0)
Bleeding (b)                  1 (0.3)
Other diagnosis              27 (8.0)

(a) N = 331; H. pylori resistance is not associated with disease
phenotype.

(b) Cause not specified.

Table 2. Resistance of HARP isolates by region (a)

                No.       Amoxicillin,    Tetracycline,
Region        isolates      no. (%)          no. (%)

Northeast       156          2 (1)              0
South            92          1 (1)              0
West             24          0                  0
Midwest          75          0                  0
Total           347          3                  0

                                                   Resistant to
              Clarithromycin,    Metronidazole,      1 agent,
Region            no. (%)           no. (%)          no. (%)

Northeast         23 (15)           47 (30)          54 (45)
South             13 (14)           13 (14)          19 (21)
West               1 (4)             4 (17)           3 (13)
Midwest            8 (11)           23 (31)          25 (33)
Total             45                87              101

              Resistant to               Resistant to
               >1 agent,      [greater than or equal to] 1 agent,
Region          no. (%)                     no. (%)

Northeast        9 (6)                      63 (40)
South            4 (4)                      23 (25)
West             1 (4)                       4 (17)
Midwest          3 (4)                      28 (37)
Total           17                         118

(a) N = 347; HARP, Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance
Monitoring Project.

Table 3. Resistance of HARP H. pylori isolates by site

                      No.       Amoxicillin,    Tetracycline
Location            isolates      no. (%)         no. (%)

Atlanta, GA            37          0                 0
Nashville, TN          45          1 (2)             0
Galveston, TX          10          0                 0
Philadelphia, PA       41          1 (2)             0
Washington, DC         93          1 (1)             0
Indianapolis, IN       36          0                 0
Detroit, MI            18          0                 0
Cleveland, OH           6          0                 0
Milwaukee, WI          15          0                 0
Stanford, CA           24          0                 0
New York, NY           22          0                 0

                                                         Resistant to
                    Clarithromycin,    Metronidazole,      1 agent,
Location                no. (%)           no. (%)          no. (%)

Atlanta, GA              7 (19)            5 (14)           4 (11)
Nashville, TN            5 (11)            5 (11)          11 (24)
Galveston, TX            1 (10)            3 (30)           4 (40)
Philadelphia, PA         6 (15)           15 (37)          16 (39)
Washington, DC          15 (16)           31 (33)          35 (38)
Indianapolis, IN         3 (8)            15 (42)          18 (50)
Detroit, MI              3 (17)            4 (22)           3 (17)
Cleveland, OH            0                 1 (17)           1 (17)
Milwaukee, WI            2 (13)            3 (20)           3 (20)
Stanford, CA             1 (4)             4 (17)           3 (13)
New York, NY             2 (9)             1 (5)            3 (14)

                    Resistant to               Resistant to
                     >1 agent,      [greater than or equal to] 1 agent,
Location              no. (%)                     no. (%)

Atlanta, GA            4 (11)                      8 (22)
Nashville, TN          0                          11 (24)
Galveston, TX          0                           4 (40)
Philadelphia, PA       3 (7)                      19 (46)
Washington, DC         6 (7)                      41 (44)
Indianapolis, IN       0                          18 (50)
Detroit, MI            2 (11)                      5 (28)
Cleveland, OH          0                           1 (17)
Milwaukee, WI          1 (7)                       4 (27)
Stanford, CA           1 (4)                       4 (17)
New York, NY           0                           3 (14)

(a) N = 347; HARP, Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance
Monitoring Project.

Table 4. Univariate analysis of risk factors for resistance to [greater
than or equal to] 1 antimicrobial agent among Helicobacter pylori
isolates submitted to HARP, 1998-2002 (a)

                                                      Proportion of
                                                    patients harboring
                                                       resistant H.
                                                      pylori isolate

Risk factor                                          Exposed, no. (%)

Zantac use 12 mo before EGD                              25 (48)
Tums use 12 mo before EGD                                19 (51)
Tums use 30 d before EGD                                 12 (55)
Mylanta use 12 mo before EGD                              4 (15)
Took antibiotic 12 mo before EGD                         29 (43)
Past treatment of H. pylori infection with
    PPI                                                   5 (71)
    Clarithromycin                                        5 (83)
Treatment for H. pylori a second time in the
  past 5 years                                           11 (65)
Treatment of H. pylori infection more than once with
    PPI                                                   8 (80)
    Clarithromycin                                        8 (80)
Age [greater than or equal to] 57 years                  50 (31)
Race/ethnicity
    Black                                                67 (39)
    Hispanic                                              2 (11)
Male sex                                                 65 (31)
HARP site
    New York, NY                                          3 (14)
    Palo Alto, CA                                         4 (17)
    Atlanta, GA                                           8 (22)
    Nashville, TN                                        11 (24)

                                                      Proportion of
                                                    patients harboring
                                                    resistant H. pylori
                                                         isolate

Risk factor                                         Unexposed, no. (%)

Zantac use 12 mo before EGD                               89 (32)
Tums use 12 mo before EGD                                 95 (32)
Tums use 30 d before EGD                                 102 (33)
Mylanta use 12 mo before EGD                             110 (36)
Took antibiotic 12 mo before EGD                          68 (34)
Past treatment of H. pylori infection with
    PPI                                                  109 (34)
    Clarithromycin                                       109 (33)
Treatment for H. pylori a second time in the
  past 5 years                                           107 (32)
Treatment of H. pylori infection more than once with
    PPI                                                  106 (33)
    Clarithromycin                                       106 (33)
Age [greater than or equal to] 57 years                   68 (37)
Race/ethnicity
    Black                                                 51 (29)
    Hispanic                                             116 (35)
Male sex                                                  47 (42)
HARP site
    New York, NY                                         115 (35)
    Palo Alto, CA                                        114 (35)
    Atlanta, GA                                          110 (36)
    Nashville, TN                                        107 (35)

Risk factor                                         Odds ratio (95% CI)

Zantac use 12 mo before EGD                         2.0 (1.1-3.6) (b)
Tums use 12 mo before EGD                           2.2 (1.1-4.4) (b)
Tums use 30 d before EGD                            2.4 (>1.0-5.8) (b)
Mylanta use 12 mo before EGD                        0.3 (0.1-1.0)
Took antibiotic 12 mo before EGD                    1.5 (0.9-2.6)
Past treatment of H. pylori infection with
    PPI                                             4.9 (1.0-26)
    Clarithromycin                                  9.9 (1.1-86)
Treatment for H. pylori a second time in the
  past 5 years                                      3.8 (1.4-11)
Treatment of H. pylori infection more than once with
    PPI                                             8.1 (1.7-39)
    Clarithromycin                                  8.1 (1.7-39)
Age [greater than or equal to] 57 years             0.8 (0.5-1.2)
Race/ethnicity
    Black                                           1.6 (1.0-2.4)
    Hispanic                                        0.2 (0.1-1.0)
Male sex                                            0.6 (0.4 1.0)
HARP site
    New York, NY                                    0.3 (0,1-1.0)
    Palo Alto, CA                                   0.4 (0.1-1.1)
    Atlanta, GA                                     0.5 (0.2-1.1)
    Nashville, TN                                   0.6 (0.3-1.2)

(a) N = 347; HARP, Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance
Monitoring Project; EGD, esophagogastro -duodenal endoscopy; PPI,
proton pump inhibitor; CI, confidence interval.

(b) These risk factors were not considered for multivariate analysis
because of small cell-size differences between subjects with a
resistant H. pylori infection and those without.

Table 5. Phase I multivariate analysis of risk factors for
resistance to [greater than or equal to] 1 antimicrobial agent among
H. pylori isolates submitted to HARP, 1998-2002 (a)

Exposure                                      Odds ratio (95% CI)

Patient treated another time for infection       6.0 (2.0-20)
Took Mylanta in last 12 mo                       0.3 (0.1-0.8)
HARP site
  New York, NY                                   0.2 (0.1-0.7)
  Palo Alto, CA                                  0.2 (0.1-0.7)
  Atlanta, GA                                    0.2 (0.1-0.6)
  Nashville, TN                                  0.4 (0,2-0.9)

(a) N = 347; HARP, Hehcobacter pylon Antimicrobial Resistance
Monitoring Project; CI, confidence interval.

Table 6. Phase II stratified multivariate analysis of risk factors for
resistance to [greater than or equal to] 1 antimicrobial agent among H.
pylori isolates submitted to HARP, 1998-2002 (a)

Risk factor                            Hazard ratio (95% CI)

Black race                                 2.1 (1.1-3.8)
Age [greater than or equal to] 57 y        0.6 (0.3-1.1)
Took antibiotics 12 mo before              1.9 (0.9-3.7)
esophagogastro-duodenal
endoscopy

(a) N = 235; HARP, Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance Project;
CI, confidence interval.

References

(1.) Lacy BE, Rosemore J. Helicobacter pylori: ulcers and more: the beginning of an era. J Nutr. 2001;131:2789S-93S.

(2.) Brown LM. Helicobaeler pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22:283-97.

(3.) Gold BD. Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2001;31:247-6.

(4.) Hoffman JSC, David R. Treatment of Helicobacterpylori. Curt Opin Gastroenterol. 2001; 17:30-4.

(5.) Broutet N, Tchamgoue S, Pereira E, Lamouliatte H, Solomon R, Megraudl F. Risk factors for failure of Helicobacter pylori therapy results of an individual data analysis of 2751 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:99-109.

(6.) Meyer JM, Silliman NP, Wang W, Siepman NY, Sugg JE, Morris D, et al. Risk factors for Helicobacter pylori resistance in the United States: the surveillance of H. pylori antimicrobial resistance partnership (SHARP) study, 1993-1999. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:13-24.

(7.) Song Q, Haller B, Schmid R, Adler G, Bode G. Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque: a comparison of different primer sets. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;4447-84.

(8.) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically--fifth edition; approved standard M7-A5. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2000.

(9.) Dore MP, Leandro G, Realdi G, Sepulveda, AR, Graham DY. Effect of pretreatment antibiotic resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin on outcome of Helicobacter pylori therapy: a meta-analytical approach. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:68-76.

(10.) Trieber CA, Taylor DE. Mutations in the 16S rRNA genes of Helicobacter pylori mediate resistance to tetracycline. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2131-40.

(11.) Osato MS, Reddy R, Graham DY. Metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance amongst Helicobacter pylori isolates from a large metropolitan hospital in the United States. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999;12:341-7.

(12.) Tolia VB, Brown W, EI-Baba M, Lin CH. Helicobacter pylori culture and antimicrobial susceptibility from pediatric patients in Michigan. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:1167-71.

(13.) Boyauova L, Stancheva I, Spassova Z, Katzarov N, Mitov I, Koumanova R. Primary and combined resistance to four antimicrobial agents in Helicobacter pylori in Sofia, Bulgaria. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:415-8.

(14.) Parsons HK, Carter MJ, Sanders DS, Winstanley T, Lobo AJ. Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial resistance in the United Kingdom: the effect of age, sex and socio-economic status. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 15:1473-8.

(15.) Franzin L, Pennazio M, Cabodi D, Paolo Rossini F, Gioannini P. Clarithromycin and amoxicillin susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from adult patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer in Italy. Curr Microbiol. 2000;40:96-100.

(16.) Boyanova L, Mentis A, Gubina M, Rozynek E, Gosciniak G, Kalenic S, et al., The status of antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in eastern Europe. Clin Microbiol Intect. 2002;8:388-96.

(17.) Wolle K, Leodolter A, Malfertbeiner P, Konig W. Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori in Germany: stable primary resistance from 1995 to 2000. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51:705-9.

(18.) Cabrita J, Oleastro M, Matos R, Manhente A, Cabral J, Barros R, et al. Features and trends in Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance in Lisbon area, Portugal (1990-1999). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46:1029-31.

(19.) Mendonca S, Ecclissato C, Sartori MS, Godoy AP, Guerzoni RA, Degger M, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone in Brazil. Helicobacter. 2000;5:79-83.

(20.) Wang WH, Wong BC, Mukhopadhyay AK, Berg DE, Cho CH, Lai KC, et al. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin in Hong Kong. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:901-111.

(21.) Al-Qurashi AR., El-Morsy F, Al-Quorain AA. Evolution of metronidazole and tetracycline susceptibility pattern in Helicobactert-pylori at a hospital in Saudi Arabia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;17:233-6.

(22.) Sharara Al, Chedid M, Araj GF, Barada KA, Mourad FH. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin and tetracycline in Lebanon. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;19:155-8.

(23.) Kato S, Fujimura S, Udagawa H, Shimizu T, Maisawa S, Ozawa K, et al. Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains in Japanese children J. Clin Microbiol. 2002:40:649-53.

William M. Duck, * Jeremy Sobel, * Janet M. Pruckler, * Qunsheng Song, * David Swerdlow, * Cindy Friedman, * Alana Sulka, * Balasubra Swaminathan, * Tom Taylor, * Mike Hoekstra, * Patricia Griffin, * Duane Smoot, ([dagger]) Rick Peek, ([double dagger]) David C. Metz, ([section]) Peter B. Bloom, ([paragraph]) Steven Goldschmid, ([paragraph]) Julie Parsonnet, (#) George Triadafilopoulos, # Guillermo I. Perez-Perez, ** Nimish Vakil, ([dagger] [dagger]) Peter Ernst, ([double dagger] [double dagger]) Steve Czinn, ([subsection]) Donald Dunne, ([paragraph]s) and Ben D. Gold *

* Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ([dagger]) Howard University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA; ([double dagger]) Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; ([section]) University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; # Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA; ** New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; ([dagger] [dagger]) Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; ([double dagger] [double dagger]) University of Virginia, Chadottesville, Virginia, USA; ([subsection]) University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; and ([paragraphs]) Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Mr. Duck is a surveillance epidemiologist in the Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His primary research interests include Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial resistance, botulism, and bioinformatics.

Address for correspondence: William M. Duck, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop A38, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; fax: [phone]; email: [e-mail]