Antimatter mystery transcends new data.Physicists have finally answered a decades-old question about the difference between matter and antimatter antimatter: see antiparticle. antimatter Substance composed of elementary particles having the mass and electric charge of ordinary matter (such as electrons and protons) but for which the charge and related magnetic properties are opposite in sign. . Yet their finding only deepens the mystery of why the universe contains so much more matter than antimatter. Last week, researchers at the Stanford (Calif.) Linear Accelerator linear accelerator: see particle accelerator. linear accelerator or linac Type of particle accelerator that imparts a series of relatively small increases in energy to subatomic particles as they pass through a sequence of Center (SLAC SLAC Stanford Linear Accelerator Center SLAC Student Labor Action Coalition SLAC Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (wrist disorder) SLAC Salt Lake Acting Company (Utah) SLAC Student Learning Assistance Center ) announced they had proved that hefty subatomic particles, known as B mesons This is a list of mesons; it is not comprehensive.this is a stub Particle Symbol Anti- particle Quark Makeup Spin and parity Rest mass MeV/c² S C B Mean lifetime s Principal decays Notes Charged Pion and anti-B mesons, decay into lighter particles in slightly different ways. This disparity, called the charge-parity (CP) violation, first became apparent in 1964 among particles known as K mesons. After that discovery, some theorists proposed that this type of disparity may solve a cosmic mystery: How is it that the universe is almost solely made of matter even though it theoretically burst into being with equal shares of matter and antimatter? A pathway to an answer opened in the 1970s when theorists predicted that B mesons also would exhibit CP violation CP violation In particle physics, the violation of the combined conservation laws associated with charge conjugation, C (the operation of turning a particle into its antiparticle), and parity, P, by the weak force. . That prediction has since been incorporated into the main theory of particle physics particle physics or high-energy physics Study of the fundamental subatomic particles, including both matter (and antimatter) and the carrier particles of the fundamental interactions as described by quantum field theory. , known as the standard model. But researchers have lacked the technology for actual tests. Since 1999, physicists working at giant particle accelerators at SLAC and at the KEK See CEC. High Energy Accelerator Research Organization in Tsukuba, Japan, have raced to test that prediction (SN: 3/3/01, p. 143). While expecting to find CP violation, they were eager to see whether their measurements would disagree with Verb 1. disagree with - not be very easily digestible; "Spicy food disagrees with some people" hurt - give trouble or pain to; "This exercise will hurt your back" the amount of CP violation predicted by the standard model. If so, physicists might find an explanation for the missing antimatter. The SLAC team analyzed the aftermath of 32 million B meson-producing collisions between electrons and their antimatter counterparts, dubbed positrons. From those crashes, the experimenters have calculated a value of 0.59 [+ or -] 0.14 for a parameter known as sin 2 [Beta]. Sin 2 [Beta] would have equaled zero if there were no CP violation among B mesons, and the standard model predicts between 0.50 and 0.85. Since the SLAC figure overlaps the sin 2 [Beta] of the standard model, a major piece of the model has been confirmed, says SLAC team member A.J. Stewart Smith of Princeton University. The new result has only 0.003 percent chance of being a statistical fluke, the team reports. The KEK team plans to release what physicists expect to be comparable results next week. Although the standard model has held up so far, Smith says, physicists intend to investigate other types of B mesons and their behavior for clues to the missing antimatter's fate. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion