Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,855 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Anti-dividend-stripping rules.


When a corporation receives a dividend from another corporation, the recipient is entitled to a deduction (known as the dividends-received deduction Dividends-received deduction

A corporate tax deduction on income allowed by company A that is in ownership of shares of company B and receives dividends on the shares of company B.
 or DRD DRD Dopa-Responsive Dystonia
DRD Dividends Received Deduction
DRD Drag Rescue Device (firefighter bunker)
DRD Deputy Regional Director
DRD Data Requirements Document
DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter
DRD Department of Redundancy Department
) equal to 70% of the amount of the dividend. The DRD's purpose is to mitigate the double taxation of corporate income--the income is taxed only once until it is finally distributed to the recipient's noncorporate shareholders. The DRD therefore, allows a corporation's dividend income to be taxed at an effective rate of only 10.5% (30% of a dividend is taxed at a 35% rate; .30 x .35 = 10.5%).

The existence of the DRD led to the practice of"dividend stripping Dividend stripping is the purchase of shares just before a dividend is paid, and the sale of those shares after that payment, ie. when they go ex-dividend.

This may be done either by an ordinary investor as an investment strategy, or by a company's owners or associates as a
," whereby a corporation would (1) purchase stock in another corporation, (2) receive a dividend and claim a DRD and (3) promptly sell the stock and sustain a capital loss on the sale, measured by the amount of the dividend (assuming there were no other price fluctuations). This capital loss could be used to offset other capital gains. The corporation also would have "converted" capital gains (taxed at a 35% rate) into 10.5% dividend income.

To combat dividend stripping, Congress made the DRD unavailable unless the stock (on which the dividend was paid) had been held for more than 45 days. Moreover, "credit" toward the 45-day holding period requirement could not be earned for days on which the corporation had diminished its risk of loss (from holding the stock) through the use of options, short sales and other hedging tactics.

Until the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 was passed, a corporation that had satisfied the 45-day standard was entitled to a DRD for all subsequent dividends even if it then held the stock on a fully hedged basis. However, the 1997 act changed this favorable fa·vor·a·ble  
adj.
1. Advantageous; helpful: favorable winds.

2. Encouraging; propitious: a favorable diagnosis.

3.
 rule. The new law requires the 45-day rule to be applied on a dividend-by-dividend basis. It accomplishes this by stating that no DRD will be allowed for dividends on stock not held for more than 45 days during the 90-day period beginning on a date that is 45 days before the "ax-dividend" date (the dine of demarcation for dividend entitlement). Accordingly, to earn a DRD with respect to a dividend, a corporate investor Noun 1. corporate investor - a company that invests in (acquires control of) other companies
company - an institution created to conduct business; "he only invests in large well-established companies"; "he started the company in his garage"
 must be at "the risk of the market" throughout the period the underlying stock is owned.

Observation: This more stringent 45-day rule will make corporate treasurers somewhat less likely to invest surplus cash in the stock of other corporations.

Robert Willens, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , managing director at Lehman Brothers Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LEH), founded in 1850, is a diversified, global financial services firm. It is a participant in investment banking, equity and fixed income sales, research and trading, investment management, private equity, and private banking. , New York City New York City: see New York, city.
New York City

City (pop., 2000: 8,008,278), southeastern New York, at the mouth of the Hudson River. The largest city in the U.S.
.
COPYRIGHT 1997 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Willens, Robert
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Dec 1, 1997
Words:413
Previous Article:New IRS assistant commissioner. (Robert E. Barr)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Year 2000 expenditures.(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Proposed loss disallowance regulations.
Comments on proposed earnings stripping regulations under Section 163(j).
Interest stripping regulations create unexpected affiliated groups.
Implications of charging interest on intercompany advances received from foreign parent companies.
Sale of mortgage loans with retained servicing rights.
The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 attacks the conversion of ordinary income to capital gain; additional changes are aimed at limiting benefits...
TAM 9325001: de facto revocation of Rev. Rul. 72-498?
U.S. shareholders of CFCs: ordering rules for "previously taxed income." (controlled foreign corporations)
ISRAEL VIOLATING PEACE ACCORDS, ARAFAT SAYS.(News)
Sec. 894 final rules for recharacterizing deductible payments.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles