And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: Closing Arguments That Changed the Way We Live.And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: Closing Arguments That Changed the Way We Live Michael S. Lief H. Mitchell Caldwell Scribner www.simonsays.com 390 pp., $30 A notable flaw in traditional legal education is its single-minded focus on the language of landmark cases, to the exclusion of both the historical context and the personalities involved. In a bold departure from this case-method myopia myopia: see nearsightedness. , Michael S. Lief and H. Mitchell Caldwell's book, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, brings alive past courtroom struggles for individual rights and civil liberties, infused with drama and human interest. There is praiseworthy praise·wor·thy adj. praise·wor·thi·er, praise·wor·thi·est Meriting praise; highly commendable. praise economy and editorial discretion in the presentation of the book's eight landmark cases, which cover the right to die, slavery, the 1950s McCarthy-era blacklists, women's suffrage The term women's suffrage refers to an economic and political reform movement aimed at extending suffrage — the right to vote — to women. The movement's origins are usually traced to the United States in the 1820s. , freedom of the press, free speech, access to health care, and forced sterilization sterilization Any surgical procedure intended to end fertility permanently (see contraception). Such operations remove or interrupt the anatomical pathways through which the cells involved in fertilization travel (see reproductive system). . While some--such as the epic battle between Jerry Falwell This article is about Jerry Falwell, Sr. For the article about his son, see Jerry Falwell, Jr. Jerry Lamon Falwell, Sr. (August 11 1933 – May 15, 2007)[1] was an American fundamentalist Christian pastor and televangelist. and Larry Flynt--have been well covered elsewhere, in print and on screen, most of the others have not. Any one of these momentous cases is worthy of an entire book, but this compilation has the core details that matter most, each story intact and full of intrigue from the conflict of ideas and personalities. This book ought to be required reading in every law school because it shows how lawyers have been critical to the development of our democracy. It does so not through syrupy self-glorification, but rather by promoting the realization that many of the rights in our country today resulted from the tenacity and skill of lawyers in the courtroom. This is a view of American history not well understood by either the legal profession or the public. There are some surprises in this book. John Quincy Adams, whom I have never viewed as more than a stuffed-shirt tintype tin·type n. See ferrotype. tintype ferrotype. See also: Photography , comes alive in his argument to the U.S. Supreme Courtin the Amistad case on February 24, 1841, capturing the moral high ground on behalf of the African prisoners seeking their freedom. The former president eloquently skewers both the federal government and President Martin Van Buren's administration, exposing their "monstrous" alliance with a Spanish government
The title focuses on closing arguments, but the book's scope is more inclusive. The oldest case presented, the trial of John Peter Zenger John Peter Zenger (October 26, 1697 – July 28, 1746) was a German-born American printer, publisher, editor and journalist in New York City. His indictment, trial and acquittal on sedition and libel charges against the Governor William Cosby of the New York Colony in 1735 for seditious libel Written or spoken words, pictures, signs, or other forms of communication that tend to defame, discredit, criticize, impugn, embarrass, challenge, or question the government, its policies, or its officials; speech that advocates the overthrow of the government by force or violence or in 1735, captures the strategic genius of one of America's first great trial lawyers--Andrew Hamilton of Philadelphia, who represented Zenger. The transcript shows how Hamilton's bold moves unfold, throwing the prosecutor and judge into obvious confusion. When the prosecution flounders in the face of Hamilton's superior skill, James DeLancey, chief justice of colonial New York's highest court, tries to rescue the government's case, with no better success. The wily Hamilton is many moves ahead of them both. By the end of the case, DeLancey belatedly realizes that Hamilton has consistently undermined his credibility with the jury: The great pains Mr. Hamilton has taken to show how little regard juries are to pay to the opinion of the judges, and his insisting so much upon the conduct of some judges in trials of this kind, is done no doubt with a design that you should take but very little notice of what I might say upon this occasion. In fact, this is what happened. The jury returned a not-guilty verdict based on the law as they felt it should be, the first recorded instance of jury nullification A sanctioned doctrine of trial proceedings wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact. in America. There is also a memorable strategic contest between lawyers Norman Roy Grutman and Alan Isaacman in Falwell's civil lawsuit against Hustler magazine and Flynt, its publisher. The trial was shaped by Flynt's videotaped deposition, where Grutman got him to admit that he intended the crude humor in an ad parody of Falwell to hurt the reverend's reputation; it was a malicious attempt to settle a grudge. Undeterred, Isaacman told the jury that this admission should not matter because the parody was so extreme that it could not be taken seriously. The jury agreed, finding that the ad did not constitute libel. The jury did award damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please [ improve this article] or discuss the issue on the talk page. , but this verdict was eventually overturned by a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court. The last case in the book, the Supreme Court's 1927 decision on forced sterilization in Buck v. Bell In Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 47 S.Ct. 584, 71 L.Ed. 1000 (1927), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Virginia state law that authorized the forced sterilization of "feeble-minded" persons at certain state institutions. , has a poignant lesson on the importance of the advocacy system. In 1924, Virginia passed a law allowing state officials to sterilize sterilize /ster·i·lize/ (ster´i-liz) 1. to render sterile; to free from microorganisms. 2. to render incapable of reproduction. ster·il·ize v. 1. people who were considered "insane" and "feebleminded." The law was meant to reduce the tax burden associated with caring for the mentally ill. Carrie Buck, a 17-year-old resident of a state insane asylum, was picked as the first candidate for sterilization. Opponents of the law mounted a legal challenge on her behalf. At trial, Buck was represented by an apathetic ap·a·thet·ic adj. Lacking interest or concern; indifferent. ap a·thet court-appointed lawyer, and the judge ruled that she
should be sterilized ster·il·ize tr.v. ster·il·ized, ster·il·iz·ing, ster·il·iz·es 1. To make free from live bacteria or other microorganisms. 2. to prevent the birth of other "defective" children. The Supreme Court upheld this ruling. Buck later was sterilized against her will, along with many other Americans like her. In commenting on this tragic lapse in the American idea of justice, which expects that both sides are well represented, the authors conclude: It underscores the difference a lawyer, armed with his passion and intellect, and fighting for a just cause, can make. Without that courtroom champion, Carrie Buck and thousands of other Americans were deprived of an essential right. That is what this book is all about--the importance of skilled, passionate lawyering in creating and expanding American democracy. All lawyers whose passion for justice called them to the legal profession will have that feeling rekindled by this worthy book. WILLIAM S. BAILEY practices with Fury Bailey in Seattle. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

a·thet
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion