Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,291,097 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Analysis: Dems confront, deal with Bush


In seven tumultuous months in power, congressional Democrats have learned to compromise with President Bush as well as confront him.

The first minimum wage increase in a decade and expanded power to eavesdrop are early fruit of the Congress that convened in January. So are the historic clash over the Iraq war and a veto on stem cell research.

"We've done a lot of heavy lifting," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said last week as Congress lumbered toward its month-long summer vacation. Across the Capitol, House Democrats offered evidence that they had already accomplished more of their early agenda than Republicans ever did with their conservative Contract With America.

With presidential veto threats in place on major bills ranging from farm subsidies and children's health to energy and troop withdrawals, Republicans argue that Democrats have less to show for their efforts than it appears.

"The president has signed virtually nothing because virtually nothing has gotten to his desk," said Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, second-ranking House Republican.

He said a high percentage of bills passed to date were measures to name post offices after prominent people _ 15 by last count.

In the current era of divided government, Bush does the signing or the rejecting, confident so far that despite his poor approval ratings he has enough Republican support to avoid a veto override.

It's far from tidy, and not likely to get any prettier in September, with the president and Congress both pointing toward a spending showdown as well as a resumption of their struggle over Iraq.

Dealings with Bush and Republicans aside, Democrats have also had to adjust to life in the majority. That has meant compromising among themselves.

"What we are here to do is to govern," Democratic Rep. Hank Johnson, a first-term Georgian, said last spring as he decided to vote for a slower-paced Iraq troop withdrawal timetable that he preferred.

For Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who took office in January as the first female speaker of the House, governing has meant trying to satisfy seemingly irreconcilable demands of her Democratic caucus.

Iraq has been an overriding challenge _ forging agreement between liberals who want the war to end quickly and moderates fearful of tying the hands of the commander in chief.

Even in the final hectic pre-vacation rush, Democrats vacillated between permitting a vote on legislation to require the Pentagon to produce a troop redeployment plan. Many liberals opposed the bipartisan measure as toothless, and ultimately it was shelved at least until fall.

The farm bill was another recent challenge. No sooner had Pelosi announced support for reform of crop payment programs than farm state lawmakers, many of them from political swing districts, complained.

She satisfied them by agreeing to increase money for the programs they favor. But that, in turn, drew criticism from urban lawmakers. They demanded _ and got _ more money for nutrition programs, as well as more than $100 million to settle discrimination claims by black farmers against the Agriculture Department.

"More needs to be done, but we have gone in the right direction for change," Pelosi said in a speech on the legislation, a summation she could easily have applied to Iraq, energy and other issues.

The farm bill passed, 231-191, on a near party-line vote _ and drew one of Bush's veto threats.

So, too, the energy bill. Confronted with one group favoring higher auto emission standards, and another opposed, Pelosi punted. The bill is silent on the issue, leaving the matter to be settled in negotiations with the Senate in the fall.

The Democrats' maneuvering room is narrower in the Senate, a nominal 51-49 advantage that leaves Reid far short of the 60 votes needed to advance an agenda past Republicans.

By GOP count, Reid has formally tried 49 times so far to cut off debate on legislation, an extraordinarily high number.

Democrats argue it's necessary to block Republican obstruction. Republicans disagree.

When Democrats "agreed to let Republicans participate and shape legislation, we've achieved good, bipartisan results," said Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader.

"When they've blocked that cooperation, they've failed."

Minimum wage was an early, illustrative example. With Bush signaling he was ready to sign legislation, McConnell and fellow Senate Republicans insisted that businesses receive tax breaks to help offset the cost of higher pay for employees.

Pelosi and Reid were opposed, but Senate Democrats were divided, and Republicans held firm.

After months of stand-off, there was accommodation. Bush signed legislation that gave the lowest paid workers a raise, and included a small tax cut for business, as well.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE _ David Espo is AP's chief congressional correspondent.

Copyright 2007 AP News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:DAVID ESPO
Publication:AP News
Date:Aug 6, 2007
Words:774
Previous Article:Feds fine American Express $65 million
Next Article:Officers' role in Christian video probed



Related Articles
The Terror, Explained.(The Week ...)(Poem)
BIPARTISANSHIP HOT IN SACTO, COLD IN D.C.(Viewpoint)
The Fightin' Dems.(Reporter-at-large)
Internal Romney document airs concerns
IBD's Top 10 - Monday
IBD's Top 10 - Friday
Nation - Friday
IBD's Top 10 - Friday
IBD's Top 10 - Tuesday
Bush warns teens of dangers of alcohol

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles