Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,588,385 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

An assault on citizens' rights.


I recently heard a statistic that, although it didn't surprise me, brought home the ferocity of the past year's attack on civil justice in America: As of mid-May, the U.S. Senate had spent 15 days debating and voting on measures related to the war in Iraq--and more than 30 days seeking to restrict the rights of injured people to hold wrong-doers accountable.

It seems that limiting consumer rights has become the centerpiece of the Bush administration's domestic policy agenda, and lawmakers allied with powerful corporate interests are pressing it hard in a Senate where the old rules apparently no longer apply. Traditionally, bills are studied and refined in committee and then passed to the Senate floor. No longer. Bills voted down on the floor are usually considered dead for the session. No longer. The Senate, often called the "greatest deliberative de·lib·er·a·tive  
adj.
1. Assembled or organized for deliberation or debate: a deliberative legislature.

2. Characterized by or for use in deliberation or debate.
 body in the world," typically conducts itself in a statesmanlike manner. No longer.

Consider how senators acted on these anticonsumer measures:

* A bill to create a "supertax supertax
Noun

an extra tax on incomes above a certain level

Noun 1. supertax - an additional tax on certain kinds of income that has already been taxed
surtax
" on contingent fees was defeated last year in committee. A week later, Senate leaders bypassed the committee and brought the same bill directly to the floor, where it was voted down again. Its proponents then made a 2 a.m. attempt to attach it as an amendment to a budget bill. That attempt failed. Finally, in a late-May floor vote, the proposal was rejected a fourth time.

* Proponents of a bill to limit the liability of negligent doctors and makers of defective drugs and medical devices failed to overcome a filibuster filibuster, term used to designate obstructionist tactics in legislative assemblies. It has particular reference to the U.S. Senate, where the tradition of unlimited debate is very strong. It was not until 1917 that the Senate provided for cloture (i.e.  a year ago. Several months ago, the bill's sponsors revised it to apply only to obstetricians and gynecologists and--without bothering to hold committee hearings--brought the measure to the floor, where a filibuster stopped it again. The Senate leadership, unwilling to take no for an answer, repackaged the bill to shield emergency room doctors; they lost on the floor a third time. Apparently, "three strikes, you're out three strikes, you're out n. recent (beginning 1994) legislation enacted in several states (and proposed in many others, as well as possible Federal law) which makes life-terms (or extremely long terms without parole) mandatory for criminals who have been convicted " doesn't apply in the Senate: A fourth medical malpractice Improper, unskilled, or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional.  bill is expected to be brought to the floor soon in the ,guise of a "rural doctors bill."

None of this legislation went through a Senate committee before it reached the floor.

(Not to be outdone out·do  
tr.v. out·did , out·done , out·do·ing, out·does
To do more or better than in performance or action. See Synonyms at excel.
, the House of Representatives recently--and completely unnecessarily--passed a medical bill identical to the one it passed last year, to "send a message." This was highly unusual, perhaps unprecedented, for Congress.)

* A bill to federalize virtually all class actions failed to overcome a filibuster several months ago; a substantially similar bill is expected on the Senate floor a second time as this issue of TRIAL goes to press.

* An asbestos bill went to the floor in May and, like the med-mal and class action bills, was blocked by a filibuster. But the measure will probably reach the floor again.

Many other bills that would eviscerate e·vis·cer·ate  
v. e·vis·cer·at·ed, e·vis·cer·at·ing, e·vis·cer·ates

v.tr.
1. To remove the entrails of; disembowel.

2.
 consumer rights were introduced this session. Major legislation that would have established a national energy policy failed to pass the Senate because it included a controversial measure to immunize im·mu·nize
v.
1. To render immune.

2. To produce immunity in, as by inoculation.



im
 oil companies from lawsuits over MTBE MTBE Methyl-tert-butyl-ether Surgery An aliphatic ether that rapidly dissolves cholesterol stones in vivo, introduced under local anesthesia via a percutaneous transhepatic cholecystectomy catheter, as a non-invasive method for treating gallstones; after injection,  contamination. Industry lobbyists keep looking for Looking for

In the context of general equities, this describing a buy interest in which a dealer is asked to offer stock, often involving a capital commitment. Antithesis of in touch with.
 an opportunity to bring back the energy bill or to attach the MTBE provision to other legislation. A bill that would have granted immunity to the gun industry died on the Senate floor. And the so-called fast-food immunity bill passed the House and awaits action in the Senate.

Because trial lawyers stand for what is right--for protecting ordinary Americans against powerful corporate interests--we have prevailed so far. As I write this, none of these measures has made it to President Bush's desk for his certain signature--an extraordinary accomplishment. Despite that success, as I conclude my ATLA ATLA Association of Trial Lawyers of America
ATLA American Theological Library Association
ATLA American Trial Lawyers Association
ATLA Air Transport Licensing Authority (Hong Kong)
ATLA Avatar: The Last Airbender
 presidency I must issue a warning.

The civil justice system faces a clear and present danger Never before have special-interest bills been taken to the Senate floor so repeatedly. Never before have the Senate's time-honored deliberative processes been so thoroughly ignored. And never before has a president of the United States The head of the Executive Branch, one of the three branches of the federal government.

The U.S. Constitution sets relatively strict requirements about who may serve as president and for how long.
 so relentlessly used his bully pulpit to attack citizens' rights for political gain.

If you care about the people you represent--and I know you do--you must act. With the fall elections only a few months away, dedicate yourself to helping elect U.S. senators who care about those they represent and the civil justice system. This is not a land of special privileges for the few: Everyone stands equal before the courts, and it is our job to keep it that way.

As you read this issue of TRIAL, you'll appreciate the breadth and depth of recent attacks on the civil justice system, and you'll get angry--angry enough, I hope, to act.
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Association for Justice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Casey, David S., Jr.
Publication:Trial
Article Type:President's Page
Date:Jul 1, 2004
Words:774
Previous Article:Hearsay.
Next Article:What's in a name?
Topics:



Related Articles
The Politics of Gun Control.
Gun Control: Threat to Liberty or Defense Against Anarchy?
Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment.
Guns and the Constitution: The Myth of Second Amendment Protection of Firearms in America.
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right.
Overcoming the Oligarchy.
Liberty and security -- in defense of both.
PUBLIC FORUM.
Feeling lucky, punk?

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles