Ameritech Indiana's 20% rate increase called "anti-competitive" and "not cost justified".INDIANAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 14, 1996--AT&T today filed a petition with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC IURC Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission ) charging that the 20 percent increase Ameritech Indiana is seeking for its intrastate in·tra·state adj. Relating to or existing within the boundaries of a state. Adj. 1. intrastate - relating to or existing within the boundaries of a state; "intrastate as well as interstate commerce" Carrier Common Line (CCL 1. CCL - Coral Common LISP. 2. CCL - Computer Control Language. English-like query language based on COLINGO, for IBM 1401 and IBM 1410. ) charges is "anti- competitive" and "not cost justified." These charges are fees paid by long-distance companies to local telephone companies such as Ameritech Indiana for connecting long-distance calls to the local telephone network. As part of Ameritech's "Opportunity Indiana" plan approved by the IURC in June 1994, Ameritech Indiana agreed to reduce the End User Common Line Charge (EUCLC) by $2.21 by June 1, 1996, which eliminates the subsidy subsidy, financial assistance granted by a government or philanthropic foundation to a person or association for the purpose of promoting an enterprise considered beneficial to the public welfare. consumers pay and reduces the subsidy business customers pay to Ameritech Indiana. However, Ameritech Indiana, with its recent filing, is increasing by 20 percent the subsidy long-distance companies in Indiana must pay the monopoly. This increase in the CCL charge will ultimately affect all long-distance customers in Indiana, since about 46 cents of every long-distance dollar goes for the use of the local telephone network. Ameritech stated in its filing that the increase in Indiana was necessary to allow Ameritech to respond to competitive pressure in Illinois. "Just because we are captive captive said of naturally wild or feral animals kept in captivity for educational and scientific investigation with no attempt being made to domesticate them. customers of Ameritech Indiana for Switched Access Service, AT&T and other long- distance companies and ultimately our customers in Indiana should not be required to pay significantly higher charges so that Ameritech can address emerging competition in Illinois," said Bob Veneck, AT&T's assistant vice president for Government Affairs in Indiana. "This is not fair to consumers and business customers in Indiana. Long-distance companies in Indiana should not be required to pay higher intrastate charges to maintain or increase the profits of Ameritech Indiana, which already is one of the most profitable Bell operating companies operating company A business that engages in transactions with outsiders. in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. . We feel that this is totally inconsistent with the concept of creating a competitive telecommunications Communicating information, including data, text, pictures, voice and video over long distance. See communications. environment in Indiana and is a clear example of Ameritech's monopoly power." In its petition AT&T is requesting that the IURC immediately reject Ameritech Indiana's proposed 20 percent CCL charge increase or set the matter for formal hearing and require Ameritech Indiana to prove that the proposed increase is justified. CONTACT: Mike Pruyn, AT&T 312-230-4894 (office) 1-800-965-9429 (pager) mpruyn@attmail.com |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion