Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,444,670 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Americans Mistaking Package for Portion


At 170 calories per serving, Kathryn Mora figured the spaghetti was harmless. So she slurped away, eating her fill. A closer look at the nutrition label destroyed all those warm comfort food feelings: A serving was just an eighth of the box _ not the whole thing.

"I can eat the entire box, like that," said Mora, snapping her fingers.

A common pitfall when checking nutrition labels is failing to factor in serving size, according to a small study by Vanderbilt University researchers. And even when people do, they often miscalculate how much they're eating. Americans' inability to understand portion control is one reason cited for the country's climbing obesity rates.

Vanderbilt's study was conducted between June 2004 and April 2005 when the low-carb craze was at its height, so many of the questions involving serving size focused on carbohydrate counts. Researchers found only about a third of the volunteers correctly estimated how many carbs were in a 20-ounce bottle of soda.

"Most people don't realize those have 2.5 servings," said Dr. Russell Rothman, lead author of the study.

Though less frequent, the same mistakes could happen when estimating calories, Rothman said. So someone drinking a 20-ounce bottle of soda may think they're getting just 100 calories when they're actually guzzling 250.

In the study, similar mistakes were made on other foods: bagels, a microwave dinner, peanut butter, a pint of ice cream, cookies and candy. That was despite nearly all respondents saying they regularly check nutrition information.

Those with lower education levels were more likely to misinterpret labels, but mistakes were made across the board.

Set by the federal Food and Drug Administration in 1993, serving sizes are often smaller than most Americans eat in a sitting. And bigger packaging over the years may have distorted perceptions.

A serving size for a drink, for example, is 8 ounces. But a can of soda has 12 ounces and most bottled sodas now contain 20 ounces or more.

Just Three Chips Ahoy chocolate chip cookies equal a serving _ and 160 calories. For Lay's Potato Chips, a serving size of about 15 chips will give you 150 calories.

And, with apologies to Madison Avenue, betcha can't eat just 15.

With two-thirds of Americans overweight or obese, the FDA recently solicited suggestions on how to tweak nutrition labels and serving sizes to make them more useful. Consumers suggested labels that reflect the entire package for foods like muffins (two servings), that are typically eaten in a single sitting.

Americans also complained that serving sizes are too small, especially for sodas and cereal. Health officials, however, worry that boosting the serving size might be taken as a cue to eat more.

Such changes could also end up fueling confusion, said Regina Hildwine, spokeswoman for the Food Products Association, which opposes sweeping changes to nutrition labeling.

The food industry has responded to the confusion in recent years with a slew of products that help people size up a serving. Chips, crackers, cookies and pudding now come in handy 100-calorie packs, and single-serving packaging has exploded in popularity.

The Vanderbilt study, which surveyed 200 people, found that overall, people answered more than two-thirds of the questions about nutrition labels correctly.

Many were confused about the meaning of "percent daily values" based on a 2,000 calorie diet. However, by far the most common mistake involved serving size; many people failed to notice the serving size number and others just miscalculated.

A pint of ice cream, for example, has four half-cup servings _ but many of those in the study interpreted that to mean one serving was half the container.

"It might be wishful thinking, but mostly it's just people reading too quickly," Rothman said.

A recent AP-Ipsos poll also found that even when most people check nutrition labels, they still buy products that scream high calories and fat.

"They're not using (the labels) because they don't understand them," Rothman said.

Cathy Nonas, a registered dietitian with the American Dietetic Association, said serving size is one of the first things she teaches her patients to look out for when reading nutrition labels.

Portion control may not be the only thing that matters when it comes to eating a healthy diet but, Nonas said, it's a "big piece" of the obesity puzzle.

___

On the Net:

United States Department of Agriculture, http://www.mypyramid.gov/

American Dietetic Association, http://www.eatright.org

Copyright 2006 AP Features
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright (c) Mochila, Inc.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:CANDICE CHOI
Publication:AP Features
Date:Sep 27, 2006
Words:728
Previous Article:Bristol-Myers Squibb to sell medical imaging unit to private equity firm for $525 million
Next Article:Judge says authorities can keep property seized from suspect cop Peterson's home



Related Articles
Taken for a swim. (how Bill Clinton's failure to compromise cost him passage of his stimulus package in Congress)
SECURITIES DEALERS INVEST IN ADS TO EDUCATE PUBLIC.(BUSINESS)
Outsourcing smarter: five outsourcing mistakes that could have a deadly impact on your company's bottom line.(EMS Insight)
EGYPT - Diplomacy For Arab-Western Parnership.
IRAN - Jun 3 - Tehran Threatens Oil Disruption In Event Of US 'Mistake'.
Spawning terrorism.(Editorials)(Report says the war hasn't made America safer)(Editorial)
Hey Small Business! Whyu You Must Have Payroll Accouting Software
Home Based Business Opportunity - Top 3 Mistakes Made when Starting An Internet Home Business
Walchhofer wins downhill
Bush confident about U.S. economy, urges stimulus

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles