American Juries: The Verdict.American Juries: The Verdict Neil Vidmar & Valerie P. Hans Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive, Amherst, NY 14228-2119 9781591025887, $32.95 www.prometheusbooks.com While the right to a trail by jury of peers is a basic American freedom, in reality civil juries have been found to be biased, irresponsible ir·re·spon·si·ble adj. 1. Marked by a lack of responsibility: irresponsible accusations. 2. Lacking a sense of responsibility; unreliable or untrustworthy. 3. and incompetent incompetent adj. 1) referring to a person who is not able to manage his/her affairs due to mental deficiency (lack of I.Q., deterioration, illness or psychosis) or sometimes physical disability. . This volume reviews some fifty years of civil and criminal juries and considers arguments pro and con PRO AND CON. For and against. For example, affidavits are taken pro and con. about the civil jury system. The verdict is a surprising support for the jury system process, comes from scholars of the jury system, and provides both background history and modern perspective, analyzing the key facts central to the jury's decision-making decision-making, n the process of coming to a conclusion or making a judgment. decision-making, evidence-based, n a type of informal decision-making that combines clinical expertise, patient concerns, and evidence gathered from process. This is a key title for any high school to college-level collection strong in American social and political history and civil rights, or basic law. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion