America's "Failing" Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind.America's "Failing" Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind. W. James Popham. (Routledge.) Popham has written a volume that indulges in flights of hyperbole yet retains a tone of serious scrutiny about NCLB NCLB No Child Left Behind (US education initiative) accountability. The author establishes his sincerity early, dismissing complaints that NCLB is underfunded un·der·fund tr.v. un·der·fund·ed, un·der·fund·ing, un·der·funds To provide insufficient funding for. underfunded adj → infradotado (económicamente) as a "phony" dispute. However, even as he is offering this sensible observation, he is explaining that NCLB, "even with super-abundant funding, will be ruinous for our schools." Popham's criticisms encompass the savvy as well as the silly. He reasonably dings NCLB for the tests the states use, for the crudeness of the adequate yearly progress Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP, is a measurement defined by the United States federal No Child Left Behind Act that allows the U.S. Department of Education to determine how every public school and school district in the country is performing academically. (AYP AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (National Assessment of Educational Progress) AYP Anarchist Yellow Pages AYP American Youth Philharmonic ) determination, and for the gamesmanship games·man·ship n. 1. The art or practice of using tactical maneuvers to further one's aims or better one's position: allowed in state AYP timelines. But then he also drags out old tropes about excessive test preparation and the ethical issues posed by such practices. Moreover, despite pointing out the difference between accountability systems and particular assessment instruments, the author frequently appears to attribute the problems of mediocre state tests to NCLB itself. While Popham's preferred solutions may cause some chuckles among accountability proponents--he champions the use of "affective inventories," student work samples, and the like--his analysis constitutes a meaningful critique of the NCLB accountability system and raises hard questions that NCLB proponents need to address. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion