Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,634,916 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

America's "Failing" Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind.


America's "Failing" Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind. W. James Popham. (Routledge.)

Popham has written a volume that indulges in flights of hyperbole yet retains a tone of serious scrutiny about NCLB NCLB No Child Left Behind (US education initiative)  accountability. The author establishes his sincerity early, dismissing complaints that NCLB is underfunded un·der·fund  
tr.v. un·der·fund·ed, un·der·fund·ing, un·der·funds
To provide insufficient funding for.

underfunded adjinfradotado (económicamente) 
 as a "phony" dispute. However, even as he is offering this sensible observation, he is explaining that NCLB, "even with super-abundant funding, will be ruinous for our schools." Popham's criticisms encompass the savvy as well as the silly. He reasonably dings NCLB for the tests the states use, for the crudeness of the adequate yearly progress Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP, is a measurement defined by the United States federal No Child Left Behind Act that allows the U.S. Department of Education to determine how every public school and school district in the country is performing academically.  (AYP AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (National Assessment of Educational Progress)
AYP Anarchist Yellow Pages
AYP American Youth Philharmonic
) determination, and for the gamesmanship games·man·ship  
n.
1. The art or practice of using tactical maneuvers to further one's aims or better one's position:
 allowed in state AYP timelines. But then he also drags out old tropes about excessive test preparation and the ethical issues posed by such practices. Moreover, despite pointing out the difference between accountability systems and particular assessment instruments, the author frequently appears to attribute the problems of mediocre state tests to NCLB itself. While Popham's preferred solutions may cause some chuckles among accountability proponents--he champions the use of "affective inventories," student work samples, and the like--his analysis constitutes a meaningful critique of the NCLB accountability system and raises hard questions that NCLB proponents need to address.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
COPYRIGHT 2005 Hoover Institution Press
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Education Next
Article Type:Book Review
Date:Sep 22, 2005
Words:211
Previous Article:Education Myths: What Special Interest Groups Want You to Believe about Our Schools--And Why It Isn't So.(Brief Article)(Book Review)
Next Article:The Charter School Dust-Up: Examining the Evidence on Enrollment and Achievement.(Book Review)
Topics:



Related Articles
Childhood Bullying and Teasing: What School Personnel, Other Professionals, and Parents Can Do.
Coping for Capable Kids.
Homeschooling: Parents as Educators.
PROFESSIONAL BOOKS.(Review)
Parents and School: The 150 Year Struggle for Control in American Education. (Reviews).
Choosing Excellence.(Book Review)
Education, Inc.: Turning Learning Into a Business (Revised Edition).(Book Review)
Family Matters: How Schools Can Cope with the Crisis in Childrearing.(Brief Article)(Book Review)
Losing our Minds: Gifted Children Left Behind.(Book review)
Childhood Lost: How American Culture Is Failing Our Kids.(Book review)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles