Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,946 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Allergan Announces Closing of FTC Investigation of ACULAR Patent Infringement Case.


Business Editors

IRVINE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 12, 2004

Allergan, Inc. (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
:AGN AGN Again (Amateur Radio)
AGN Active Galactic Nucleus
AGN Acute Glomerulonephritis
AGN Accountants Global Network
AGN Air Gabon (ICAO code) 
) announced today that the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC FTC

See Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
) Bureau of Competition has notified Allergan that it has officially closed its investigation to determine whether Allergan, Syntex International, Ltd. (now Roche Palo Alto), or any other person is engaging in unfair competition by monopolizing or attempting to monopolize mo·nop·o·lize  
tr.v. mo·nop·o·lized, mo·nop·o·liz·ing, mo·nop·o·liz·es
1. To acquire or maintain a monopoly of.

2. To dominate by excluding others: monopolized the conversation.
 the market for ketorolac tromethamine ketorolac tromethamine

Acular, Acular LS

Pharmacologic class: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)

Therapeutic class: Analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory

Pregnancy risk category C
 ophthalmic solution by preventing or slowing generic competition to ACULAR(R) (ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5%).

"We are pleased with the closing of this investigation by the FTC," said Douglas Ingram, Allergan's Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. "With the closing of this investigation, all open issues involving our ultimately successful decision to protect our ACULAR(R) intellectual property position have been entirely resolved."

The FTC's decision to close the investigation follows a December 29, 2003 ruling by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California The United States District Court for the Northern District of California is the Federal district court whose jurisdiction comprises following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa  in favor of Allergan, Inc., and Syntex International, Ltd., and concluding that the patent covering ACULAR(R) is valid, enforceable and infringed by a generic drug proposed to be manufactured by Apotex, Inc., Apotex Corp., and Novex Pharma Inc. (the "Apotex Defendants"). The FTC decision also follows the dismissal of a separate action brought by the Apotex Defendants against Allergan and Roche Palo Alto LLC (Logical Link Control) See "LANs" under data link protocol.

LLC - Logical Link Control
. The antitrust action was based on allegations concerning the patent infringement lawsuit.

ACULAR(R) is currently the number one prescribed ophthalmic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory in both the United States and the rest of the world. ACULAR(R) is indicated for the temporary relief of ocular itching due to seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and the treatment of post-operative inflammation in patients who have undergone cataract surgery.

About Allergan, Inc.

Allergan, Inc., with headquarters in Irvine, California, is a technology-driven, global health care company providing eye care and specialty pharmaceutical products worldwide. Allergan develops and commercializes products in the eye care, neuromodulator, skin care and other specialty markets that deliver value to our customers, satisfy unmet medical needs, and improve patients' lives.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Feb 12, 2004
Words:339
Previous Article:Revlon to Hold an Analyst Meeting on February 18, 2004.
Next Article:DDi Corp. To Announce Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2003 Financial Results.
Topics:



Related Articles
Supreme Court focuses on associations.
Consumer class actions follow suits by generic drug makers against brand-name companies.
INTERNET PRIVACY CASE SETTLED; FTC, GEOCITIES REACH AGREEMENT.
RECORDING COMPANIES QUESTIONED : JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, FTC HOLDING PROBES.
30,000 BILLED BY FTC : LONG-DISTANCE FEE MAY BE IMPROPER.
Feed The Children beats Nashville solicitation ordinance. (News Line).
States join fight against drug companies for keeping generics off the market.
BRIEFCASE PHILIP MORRIS CUTS SOME DISCOUNTING.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles