Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,571 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Allegheny County Prison Emp. v. County of Allegh.


U.S. District Court

EMPLOYEE

VISITOR

Allegheny County Prison Emp. v. County of Allegh., 315 F.Supp.2d 728 (W.D.Pa. 2004). Employees at a county jail brought a suit challenging its employee search policy, which involved random pat-down searches by same sex employees of all areas of the searched employee's body. including the abdomen abdomen, in humans and other vertebrates, portion of the trunk between the diaphragm and lower pelvis. In humans the wall of the abdomen is a muscular structure covered by fascia, fat, and skin.  and groin groin, in oceanography: see coast protection. , as well as the removal of outer clothing, shoes and belts. The employees moved for a preliminary injunction A temporary order made by a court at the request of one party that prevents the other party from pursuing a particular course of conduct until the conclusion of a trial on the merits.

A preliminary injunction is regarded as extraordinary relief.
. The district court denied the motion, finding that the employees failed to demonstrate the likelihood of success on their Fourth Amendment or equal protection claims. The court noted that the county had a strong government interest in controlling the flow of contraband contraband, in international law, goods necessary or useful in the prosecution of war that a belligerent may lawfully seize from a neutral who is attempting to deliver them to the enemy.  into prisons, and that employees had a diminished di·min·ish  
v. di·min·ished, di·min·ish·ing, di·min·ish·es

v.tr.
1.
a. To make smaller or less or to cause to appear so.

b.
 expectation of privacy because they worked in a correctional facility. The search policy was uniformly applied to all employees and visitors who had contact with inmates. (Allegheny County Prison, Pennsylvania)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SEARCHES
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2PA
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:156
Previous Article:Watson v. Riggle.
Next Article:Moore v. Vega.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: SEARCH CORRESPONDENCE.
U.S. District Court: SEIZURE.
U.S. District Court: PRIVACY SEARCHES.
U.S. District Court: RIGHT TO PRIVACY MAIL.
U.S. District Court: CELL SEARCH SEARCH WARRANT.
U.S. District Court: MAIL PRETRIAL DETAINEES.
Roland v. Murphy.
Wood v. Hancock County.
Allegheny County Prison Emp. v. County of Allegh.
Searches.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles