Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,946 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

All change: now MPs' expenses to be revealed.


Byline: By EXAMINER News Correspondent

MPs face having full details of their expenses laid bare after Gordon Brown staged an embarrassing climbdown.

The Prime Minister said a controversial bid to exempt parliament from key parts of the Freedom of Information (FOI FOI Freedom Of Information
FOI Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut (Swedish Defence Research Agency)
FOI The Swedish Defence Research Agency
FOI Field of Interest
FOI Full of It
FOI Fruit of Islam
) Act was being shelved.

The dramat ic U-turn sparked a blame game between themain parties, with Mr Brown accusing the Tories of reneging on a deal to back the move.

However, that claim was flatly denied by David Cameron Editing of this page by unregistered or newly registered users is currently disabled due to vandalism. , who insisted he had always been clear that exempting MPs from FOI would be wrong.

The row over generous parliamentary expenses was re-ignited last week when Commons leader Harriet Harmanmade the latest bid to sidestep side·step  
v. side·stepped, side·step·ping, side·steps

v.intr.
1. To step aside: sidestepped to make way for the runner.

2.
 disclosure.

The proposals were backdated to 2005, meaning they would have nullified nul·li·fy  
tr.v. nul·li·fied, nul·li·fy·ing, nul·li·fies
1. To make null; invalidate.

2. To counteract the force or effectiveness of.
 rulings from the High Court and Information Tribunal that the public had a right to see receipts showing exactly how MPs were using allowances for second homes.

Instead, expenses would have been published under more categories than before, but still not fully itemised.

The plans came despite the Commons authorities already having spent some pounds 1m since May scanning and redacting 1.2 million receipts ready for publication.

There has been speculation that they were driven by lobbying from some Labour MPs who fear deep embarrassment if disclosure goes ahead.

Ms Harman insisted the Conservatives had backed the measures until "more or less yesterday", but then "pulled the plug" and announced their MPs would be instructed to vote against.

She denied the Government was trying to "cover up" details of expenses.

"What we've said is receipts must be produced and they must be audited but we didn't think it was right that there should be 1.2 million receipts, every single receipt for every ream of paper that is bought should be necessary, and then published."

CAPTION(S):

COMMONS ROW: PM Gordon Brown under fire
COPYRIGHT 2009 MGN Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Huddersfield, England)
Date:Jan 22, 2009
Words:312
Previous Article:Respectable granddad lost temper.
Next Article:The handheld PC; 1,000 frontline police to get Blackberry phones.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles