Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,756 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Air force tanker: a competition, but not really.


Politics is a huge piece of an upcoming competition between Boeing and the European conglomerate conglomerate, in business
conglomerate, corporation whose asset growth, often very rapid, comes largely through the acquisition of, or merger with, other firms whose products are largely unrelated to each other or to that of the parent company.
 Airbus to build possibly hundreds of aerial refueling Aerial refueling, also called Air refueling or in-flight refueling (IFR) or air-to-air refueling (AAR) or (in the UK) tanking. Note that AAR also stands for "After Action Review" (de-briefing) and in aviation, IFR also stands for  tankers for the U.S. Air Force. Many industry insiders agree that it is unlikely that Airbus will win the contract, and that the tanker competition is only a facade facade (fəsäd`), exterior face or wall of a building. The term implies ordered placement of its openings and other features and thus seems inapplicable to a wall without design. .

The Defense Department in fact does not care if there is competition as long as it gets the product it wants, said Pentagon Pentagon

Huge five-sided building (1941–43) in Arlington, Va., that is the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense. Designed by George Edwin Bergstrom, it was, on its completion, the world's largest office building, covering 34 acres (14 hectares) and offering
 acquisition chief Kenneth Krieg. In the tanker program, he said, the goal was to "create an interesting model for more than one competitor to participate in ... But we especially wanted to make sure that the request for a proposal we put out there was for a product that we wanted, not for a product that ensured a competition ... More competition is better than less competition, but to have to go to a competition for something you don't want then sends you off into an environment you don't want to be in."
COPYRIGHT 2007 National Defense Industrial Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Washington PULSE
Comment:Air force tanker: a competition, but not really.(Washington PULSE)
Publication:National Defense
Date:May 1, 2007
Words:167
Previous Article:Lawmakers wonder why services can't cooperate.(Washington PULSE)
Next Article:$160b army effort so far an 'interesting experiment'.(Washington PULSE)
Topics:



Related Articles
Management: Boeing's next Airbus dilemma?(CEO Watch)(European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company enters tanker market)
Atlantic crossing: Northrop's proposed partnership poses risks.(Northrop Grumman Corp., EADS N.V.)
NORTHROP, AIRBUS MAY TEAM PARTNERSHIP WITH EUROPEAN FIRM WOULD BUILD AIR FORCE TANKERS.(Business)
Company Watch - BoeingISSN 1544-3760.
Company Watch - Boeing.
Aircraft News - North America.
Aging aircraft, war costs weigh heavily in future budgets.(AIR FORCE)
Tanker takers.(News of the Week)
Northrop stays in running for refueling planes--but barely.(Northrop Grumman Corp.)
Going for it.(News of the Week)(Northrop Grumman Corp. and EADS N.V. bid for Air Force's aerial refueling tanker contract)(Brief article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles