Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,946 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Age-discrimination proponents win big in Sacramento. (California Law).


California's Supreme Court has ruled that the law barring age bias against employees doesn't apply to awarding job benefits.

According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, the state protects workers over age 40--half of the state's workforce--from age discrimination only in hiring, termination, demotion de·mote  
tr.v. de·mot·ed, de·mot·ing, de·motes
To reduce in grade, rank, or status.



[de- + (pro)mote.
 and suspension, but not in awarding benefits.

While the Fair Employment and Housing Act, on which this case was based, generally governs in California, the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Pub. L. No. 90-202, 81 Stat. 602 (Dec. 15, 1967), codified as Chapter 14 of Title 29 of the United States Code, through (ADEA), prohibits employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or older in the United States (see ).  prohibits discrimination against workers between the ages of 40 and 65, including discrimination in terms and conditions of employment conditions of employment

that part of an employment that sets out the duties, responsibilities, hours of work, salary, leave and other privileges to be enjoyed by persons employed, for example a veterinary nurse, in private practice.
.

For more information go to: www.hrcalifornia.com/cid.cfm?web=11018&cid=lle_june2702-2.
COPYRIGHT 2002 California Society of Certified Public Accountants
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:California CPA
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2002
Words:106
Previous Article:Poll reveals public wants government to regulate big biz. (Survey Says).
Next Article:Achievements. (Member Milestones).
Topics:



Related Articles
Discrimination provision expanded to cover former workers.
State of discrimination.
Worker `too old' to receive benefits cannot claim discrimination.
Pre-hire pregnancy screening in Mexico's maquiladoras: is it discrimination?
Litigation packets guide bad-faith, pharmaceutical, and discrimination cases.
The ugly truth about appearance discrimination and the beauty of our employment discrimination law.
An essay for Keisha (and a response to Professor Ford).

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles