Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,709,930 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Affirmative action. (You be the Judge!).


THE CASE:

Barbara Barbara

maid exemplifying personal and domestic neatness. [Br. Lit.: Old Curiosity Shop]

See : Orderliness
 Grutter wanted to become a lawyer. So, the 43-year-old mother of two applied to law school at the University of Michigan (body, education) University of Michigan - A large cosmopolitan university in the Midwest USA. Over 50000 students are enrolled at the University of Michigan's three campuses. The students come from 50 states and over 100 foreign countries. .

Grutter thought that her age and experience in business would help get her into law school. But instead of being accepted, she got a rejection letter A rejection letter is a form of communication, print or otherwise, indicating the refusal of assent (viz: rejection) of a recommended course. There are numerous types and subtypes of rejection letters.  from the university.

Grutter later learned that students with lower college grades and lower standardized test A standardized test is a test administered and scored in a standard manner. The tests are designed in such a way that the "questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations are consistent" [1]  scores had been accepted by the law school instead of her. These students were admitted, in part, because they were minorities.

Grutter, who is white, believed that affirmative action affirmative action, in the United States, programs to overcome the effects of past societal discrimination by allocating jobs and resources to members of specific groups, such as minorities and women.  (giving minority students special treatment in the admissions process) was a form of discrimination. So she sued the University of Michigan. The case is now before the Supreme Court.

THE ARGUMENTS:

Grutter and her lawyers claim that affirmative action gives some people special rights, and thus violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which grants all Americans equal opportunities in education. Grutter's lawyers also argue that affirmative action denies many people their 14th Amendment right to "due process of law."

Lawyers representing the university argue that diversity is an important part of education, and that affirmative action helps to achieve this goal. And, in previous cases, other courts have allowed universities to seek out minority students in the admissions process, as long as they do not use quotas (set number or percentages) for admitting these students.

YOU DECIDE:

Should affirmative action be of school's admission process? Or is it a form of discrimination that violates the 14th Amendment?

ANSWERS

Affirmative Action: The case, Grutter v. Bollinger Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. The 5-4 decision was announced on June 23, 2003. , is currently before the Supreme Court. Check the Court's Web site for a decision: www.supremecourtus.gov.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Scholastic, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Junior Scholastic
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 24, 2003
Words:277
Previous Article:Marbury v. Madison: a landmark decision made 200 years ago changed the Supreme Court forever. (American History).
Next Article:Freedom of speech. (You be the Judge!).(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Courting trouble.(Supreme Court affirmative action cases)
California court voids minority set-aside in wake of Adarand.(Brief Article)
Quota U - Ann Arbor shows its colors.
The diversity dilemma.(Gratz versus Bollinger, affirmative action case)(Brief Article)
The affirmative action deathwatch.(Supreme Court will hear a case involving a highway construction company)(Brief Article)
Being Lee Bollinger: The very model of a modern college president.
Bush's affirmative action doublespeak. (Insider Report).(Brief Article)
Race matters: this year, the Supreme Court could dismantle affirmative action. Would it be ending an unfair practice or hurting the cause of racial...
Shouldn't be a federal case: affirmative action, like myriad other topics including anti-sodomy laws, should not be a subject for the federal courts...
Affirmative action.(News for Educational Workers)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles