Advice and consent: confirming Supreme Court Justices.The Supreme Court is the highest court in the nation. It decides whether federal laws, state laws, and decisions made by lower courts are constitutional. Once confirmed, a Justice serves for life. That makes appointing and confirming Supreme Court Justices one of the most important duties of the President and the Senate. Read about this process below, then answer the following questions. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Article II, Section Two, of the U.S. Constitution, the President of the United States The head of the Executive Branch, one of the three branches of the federal government. The U.S. Constitution sets relatively strict requirements about who may serve as president and for how long. has the power to appoint "Justices of the Supreme Court." The Constitution also requires "the Advice and Consent [approval] of the Senate." In practice, this means that the President nominates a candidate, who must be voted on by the Senate, which confirms (accepts) or rejects the nomination. This basic process has been followed since the beginning of the country. Also since the beginning, it has involved fierce political battles. Even George Washington, as the nation's first President, faced controversy. In 1795, the Senate rejected his choice of John Rutledge Noun 1. John Rutledge - United States jurist and second chief justice of the United States Supreme Court; he was appointed by George Washington and briefly served as chief justice but was ultimately rejected by the United States Senate (1739-1800) Rutledge for Chief Justice by a vote of 14-10. Over the years, Senate rules and tradition have shaped the specifics of the Senate's voting process. Today, a President's nomination first goes to the 18-member Senate Judiciary Committee The U.S. Senate established the Committee on the Judiciary on December 10, 1816, as one of the original 11 standing committees. It is also one of the most powerful committees in Congress; among its wide range of jurisdictions is investigation of federal judicial nominees and oversight of . This committee holds hearings, during which members question the nominee nominee n. 1) a person or entity who is requested or named to act for another, such as an agent or trustee. 2) a potential successor to another's rights under a contract. about his or her judicial philosophy. Then the committee votes whether or not to recommend approval by the full Senate. Next, the full Senate votes on the nomination--the vote that counts. Nominees must be approved by a majority of Senators. A majority of votes does not guarantee a nominee's approval. Senators in the minority party sometimes use a delaying tactic called the filibuster filibuster, term used to designate obstructionist tactics in legislative assemblies. It has particular reference to the U.S. Senate, where the tradition of unlimited debate is very strong. It was not until 1917 that the Senate provided for cloture (i.e. . If a filibuster is successful, Senators can delay a vote until the President withdraws the nomination or the nominee gives up. In 1968, Senate Republicans used the filibuster to block President Lyndon B. Johnson's nomination of Justice Abe Fortas Abraham Fortas (June 19, 1910–April 5, 1982) was a U.S. Supreme Court associate justice. He served in that role from October 4, 1965 until May 14, 1969, when he resigned under pressure. Early years Fortas was born in Memphis, Tennessee. as Chief Justice. The choice of Chief Justice fell to the following President, Richard Nixon. His nominee, Warren Burger Noun 1. Warren Burger - United States jurist appointed chief justice of the United States Supreme Court by Richard Nixon (1907-1995) Burger, Warren E. Burger, Warren Earl Burger , was confirmed in 1969. Words to Know constitutional: legal according to the Constitution of the United States Constitution of the United States, document embodying the fundamental principles upon which the American republic is conducted. Drawn up at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787, the Constitution was signed on Sept. * filibuster: a tactic used to delay votes in the Senate * nominate nom·i·nate tr.v. nom·i·nat·ed, nom·i·nat·ing, nom·i·nates 1. To propose by name as a candidate, especially for election. 2. To designate or appoint to an office, responsibility, or honor. : name (choose) as a candidate. QUESTIONS Write your answers on a separate sheet of paper. 1. What is the Supreme Court's function? 2. What is the President's role in the selection process for Supreme Court Justices? 3. What is the Senate's role in this process? 4. What group is first to vote on the nomination? 5. Does this vote decide if the nominee is approved? 6. If the President's party has a majority in the Senate, can the President still lose the nomination battle? 7. Where can you find the process for the confirmation of Justices written down? 8. Why would a President want to appoint as many Supreme Court Justices as possible? 9. Who was the first President to face a difficult nomination process? 10. Why do you think the Constitution makes Supreme Court Justice a lifetime term? 1. It rules on whether laws or lower-court rulings are constitutional. 2. The President nominates candidates to the Court. 3. The Senate votes whether or not to confirm the President's choice President's Choice (or "PC") is the private label brand of Loblaw Companies Limited, the largest food retailer in Canada. The PC brand includes a wide variety of food, drinks and consumer products, and services, such as President's Choice Financial services. . 4. the Senate Judiciary Committee 5. No. The committee simply votes whether to recommend approval by the full Senate. 6. Yes. The filibuster is sometimes used by minority-party Senators to block nominations. 7. The process isn't written down in one place. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution says what powers the President and the Congress have. But the specifics of the process are a result of years of Senate rules and tradition. 8. Presidents naturally want as many Justices as possible to agree with their interpretation on whether laws or rulings are constitutional. 9. George Washington 10. Answers will vary; the key point is that it protects Justices against being fired by a President who doesn't like their decisions. |
|
||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion