Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,677,581 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Administrative appeal rights in innocent spouse cases.


Under Sec. 6013 (d) (3), married taxpayers filing jointly are jointly and severally Jointly and Severally

1. A legal term describing a partnership in which individual decisions are bound to all parties involved and thus undivided.

2. A term used in underwriting syndicates to refer to the distinct responsibility of individual companies to sell a certain
 liable for tax. In certain circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact.
     2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or
, Sec. 6015 provides innocent spouse spouse  A legal marriage partner as defined by state law  relief from liability on request, as well as various administrative appeal rights to the requesting spouse. In Rev. Proc. 2003-19, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  has now granted some of these rights to nonrequesting spouses whose spouses of former spouses sought innocent spouse relief from joint and several liability under Sec. 6015.

Prior to Rev. Proc. 2003-19, the Service had given only the spouse requesting relief the right to file a written protest and receive an administrative conference with the IRS's Office of Appeals (Appeals) for a determination. The new procedure allows the nonrequesting spouse the right to file a written protest and have an Appeals conference on a decision that granted partial or full innocent spouse relief to the requesting spouse. In most cases, the nonrequesting spouse will protest a decision granting relief to the requesting spouse, but cannot appeal the decision to the Tax Court, under Rev. Proc. 2003-19. Sec. 6015(e) (1) (A) gives that right only to the requesting spouse. Thus, the nonrequesting spouse generally has no recourse The right of an individual who is holding a Commercial Paper, such as a check or promissory note, to receive payment on it from anyone who has signed it if the individual who originally made it is unable, or refuses, to tender payment.  once the Service makes a final innocent spouse determination.

General Procedures

To apply for relief, a requesting spouse has to file Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, or submit a written statement to the IRS containing the same information required by Form 8857.When a taxpayer files such a request under Sec. 6015, the IRS will issue a preliminary determination letter based on the claims merits. If the determination grants full or partial relief to the requesting spouse, the Service will suspend processing of the claim for 45 days, pending an appeal by the nonrequesting spouse, and notify the requesting spouse that the nonrequesting spouse has the right to protest the preliminary determination. The IRS will notify both spouses simultaneously of a preliminary determination to grant full or partial relief.

The nonrequesting spouse can file a written protest and seek an Appeals conference, by requesting it in writing within 30 calendar days of the mailing date Mailing Date

A specific date set for the mailing of certain material to security holders such as interim reports, proxy material and dividend checks.
 of the preliminary determination notice. Such a request suspends further processing of the requesting spouse's claim for relief pending the outcome.

If only the nonrequesting spouse files a written protest asking for an Appeals conference, the Service will notify the requesting spouse of the nonrequesting spouse's action. If the IRS proposes to change the preliminary determination after the Appeals conference with the nonrequesting spouse, the requesting spouse will be able to ask for an Appeals conference before a final determination.

On the other hand, if only the requesting spouse files a written protest asking for an Appeals conference, the Service will notify the nonrequesting spouse of the requesting spouse's protest and hold an Appeals conference with the requesting spouse. If Appeals proposes to increase the relief recommended, the nonrequesting spouse can request an Appeals conference.

If both spouses file written protests asking for Appeals conferences, the 112.S will notify each of the other's request, and hold a separate Appeals conference with each spouse and permit both to submit information. At its discretion, the Service may decide to hold a joint Appeals conference to expedite ex·pe·dite  
tr.v. ex·pe·dit·ed, ex·pe·dit·ing, ex·pe·dites
1. To speed up the progress of; accelerate.

2.
 a resolution and reach a final determination.

Under these general procedures, both spouses can claim innocent spouse relief for the same return. Thus, each could be a requesting spouse and nonrequesting spouse under this process.

Conclusion

Under Rev. Proc. 2003-19, the nonrequesting spouse not only has the right to be notified of" the requesting spouse's claim for relief and to submit information for consideration in an IRS administrative determination, but he or she can also file a protest and receive an Appeals conference on an IRS determination.

Rev. Proc. 2003-19 is effective for innocent spouse relief claims filed after March 31, 2003, and to earlier-filed claims for which the Service has not issued a preliminary determination as of April 1,2003.

FROM FRANK TAYLOR Taylor, city (1990 pop. 70,811), Wayne co., SE Mich., a suburb of Detroit adjacent to Dearborn; founded 1847 as a township, inc. as a city 1968. A small rural village until World War II, it developed significantly in the second half of the 20th cent. , CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , HOWARD, WERSHBALE & CO., CLEVELAND, OH

Mark H. Ely, J.D., CPA

Partner

Washington National Tax

KPMG KPMG Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (accounting firm)
KPMG Kaiser Permanente Medical Group
KPMG Keiner Prüft Mehr Genau (German)
KPMG Kommen Prüfen Meckern Gehen
 LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  

Washington, DC
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Ely, Mark H.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Oct 1, 2003
Words:679
Previous Article:The "new" IRS audits.
Next Article:Common pitfalls in information reporting.
Topics:



Related Articles
Protecting innocent spouses. (joint tax liabilities)
Taxpayer Bill of Rights 3.
The Tax Court's enhanced power to help innocent spouses.
Innocent spouse/domestic violence.
Executor may not elect innocent spouse relief on behalf of deceased spouse.
Is the Tax Court becoming a divorce court? The answer could change how the innocent spouse rules are interpreted.
Nonrequesting spouse may seek administrative appeal of innocent spouse relief.
Nonelecting innocent spouse rules.(US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit decision in Maier v. Commissioner)
Appealing innocent spouse relief.
IRS changes procedures for equitable innocent spouse cases.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles