Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,585,946 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Administrative Expenditures and Federal Matching Rates of Selected Support Programs.


GAO-05-839R June 30, 2005

The federal government spends billions of dollars annually for programs that help low-income families and other individuals. A significant portion of these funds cover administrative costs administrative costs,
n.pl the overhead expenses incurred in the operation of a dental benefits program, excluding costs of dental services provided.
 rather than direct benefits and services. To provide information on how these administrative costs compare across programs and the federal government's role in funding these programs' administrative costs, we examined (1) total funding and the amounts and types of administrative expenditures for selected programs and (2) the federal matching rates for these administrative expenditures.

Total expenditures, including administrative and all other expenditures, for the seven programs in our review ranged from $2.9 billion for Adoption Assistance to $295 billion for Medicaid, including both federal and state expenditures. Total expenditures generally include the costs of direct benefits, such as the costs of food stamps and medical services, as well as all other costs of administering the programs and providing benefits. For each of the programs in our review, both the federal and state governments provide program funding. The federal share of total program expenditures ranged from 53 percent for Foster Care to 91 percent for the Food Stamp Program The US Food Stamp Program is a federal assistance program that provides food to low income people living in the United States. Benefits are distributed by the individual states, but the program is administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture. . The specific types of expenditures that are considered administrative differ considerably across the programs. For example, administrative costs for Foster Care include case planning, recruitment and licensing of foster care homes, and eligibility determination activities, as well as other activities. In contrast, administrative costs for CCDF CCDF Child Care and Development Fund
CCDF Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function
CCDF Central Clothing Distribution Facility
 do not include the costs of providing direct services, such as determining eligibility and placing children in child care. Both federal and state funds are used for administrative expenditures. The federal share of administrative expenditures ranged from 49 percent for the Food Stamp Program to 70 percent for SCHIP SCHIP State Children's Health Insurance Program . The sharing of administrative costs between the federal and state governments is based largely on federal matching rates, in accordance with federal laws and regulations. The federal matching rate is 50 percent for most administrative expenditures for Medicaid, the Food Stamp Program, Foster Care, and Adoption Assistance, although higher federal matching rates may apply to certain expenses. For CSE (Certified Systems Engineer) See Microsoft certification. , the federal matching rate is 66 percent for most administrative expenditures. For a portion of CCDF administrative expenditures, the federal matching rate varies by state and ranges from 50 percent to 77 percent. For SCHIP, the federal matching rate also varies by state and ranges from 65 percent to about 84 percent. In addition, administrative expenditures in SCHIP and CCDF are capped at 10 percent and 5 percent, respectively, of total expenditures.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:415
Previous Article:Hazardous Waste Programs: Information on Appropriations and Expenditures for Superfund, Brownfields, and Related Programs.
Next Article:Human Capital: Selected Agencies Have Opportunities to Enhance Existing Succession Planning and Management Efforts.
Topics:



Related Articles
More adoptions out of foster care. (Statestats).
Klamath River Basin Conservation Area Restoration Program: Limited Assurance Regarding the Federal Funding Requirements.
Child Support Enforcement: More Focus on Labor Costs and Administrative Cost Audits Could Help Reduce Federal Expenditures.
Financial Audit: Special Counsel Expenditures for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2007.
Federal User Fees: Substantive Reviews Needed to Align Port-Related Fees with the Programs They Support.
Medicaid: CMS Needs More Information on the Billions of Dollars Spent on Supplemental Payments.
Audit of Special Counsel Expenditures for the 6 Months Ended March 31, 2008.
Executive summary.
Federal-state relationships.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles