Printer Friendly

Adjustment to spinal cord injury: a review of coping styles contributing to the process.

The coping process following spinal cord injury is not well understood despite nearly fifty years of study. Today's climate of increasing costs and decreasing length of hospital stay, lends an urgency to understanding the process so early identification of patients at risk for disturbed adjustment can occur.

Malec and Neimeyer (1983) have suggested that difficulties adjusting to spinal cord injury may lead to decreased quality of life, poor self care and costly multiple medical problems. Even more distressing is the estimate that persons with spinal cord injury commit suicide two to six times more frequently than the general population (Frisbie & Kache, 1983; Geisler, Jousse, Wynne-Jones, & Breithaupt, 1983; Judd & Brown, 1992).

The scientific literature has yet to explain why some people effectively adjust and others do not (Krause & Crewe, 1990). Early investigators sought to explain individual differences in response to spinal cord injury by examining personality constructs (Guttmann, 1976; Harris, Patel, Greer, & Naughton, 1973; Mueller & Thompson, 1950; Roberts, 1972; Siller, 1969; Wittkower, Gingras, Mergler, Wigdor, & Lepine, 1954).

The role of depression also received a good deal of attention for many years (Trieschmann, 1980). Proponents of "stage" theories of adjustment insisted that patients must experience depression as one of a sequence of emotional reactions leading to improved adjustment (Bracken & Shepard, 1980; Cook, 1979; Hohman, 1975; Kerr & Thompson, 1972). Others have shown however, that despite treatment efforts aimed at fostering depressed affect many patients do not become depressed and still cope effectively with their injury (Bodenhamer, Achterberg-Lawlis, Kevorkian, Belanus, & Cofer, 1983; Ernst, 1987).

Depression is typically assumed by treatment staff even in the absence of behavioral manifestations. If patients do not appear depressed, they are "in denial" and concern about them is expressed. Investigators using objective criteria over the course of treatment indicate that patients may experience sadness or depressed mood, but not meet the DSM-IIIR definition of major depression (Judd, Brown, & Burrows, 1991). The frequency of major depression in acute injury, regardless of level, reaches about 20% measured by objective psychological testing (Howell, Fullerton, Harvey, & Klein, 1981; Judd, Burrows, & Brown, 1986; Nestoros, Demers-Desrosiers, & Dalicandro, 1982; Richards, 1986). These findings caution treatment specialists that to assume most suffer depression may place an unnecessary and excessive burden on patients as well as treatment resources (Frank, Van Valin, & Elliot, 1987; Hammell, 1992; Judd, Stone, Webber, Brown, & Burrows, 1989).

An effective method of early diagnosis and treatment of clinically depressed patients must be inherent to any rehabilitation effort since acutely injured patients who experience major depression do poorly in rehabilitation (Bracken & Bernstein, 1980; Trieschmann, 1980). It is essential that objective measures be used since staff, no matter what their discipline (psychology included), overestimate levels of depression in their patients when relying on clinical impressions (Cushman & Dijkers, 1990).

Although depression may lead to difficulties in rehabilitation and adjustment, the absence of depression may not necessarily bode that all is well. Hence, finding out what's wrong with the patient is one goal. Finding out what's right is another. The charge to treatment specialists is to identify variables relevant to the adjustment process, and develop valid and reliable measures. The study of cognitive mediating factors such as coping style may make this task easier.

Feifel, Strack, and Nagy (1987) used a three-factor model of coping (confrontation, avoidance, and acceptance-resignation) and found patients with life threatening illness who used "avoidance" or "acceptance-resignation" did not cope well. Those with non-life-threatening illness using the same coping styles were more effective.

Elliott, Witty, Herrick, and Hoffman (1991), relying on a two-factor coping model proposed by Snyder (1989), reported that patients in the acute phase of traumatic spinal cord injury, with a strong desire to achieve goals (factor 1), had lower scores on measures of depression and distress. Those injured longer, who had well developed strategies for goal attainment (factor 2), also scored lower on measures of depression and distress.

In a review of coping models, Frank et al. (1987) and Frank and Elliott (1987) suggested that style used to cope with spinal cord injury, regardless of time since onset, may dramatically affect the adjustment process. Certain coping styles may lead to depression, others to non-compliance or to anxiety, and yet others may lead to successful adjustment (Ray & West, 1984).

Lazarus and his colleagues (Coyne, Aldwin, & Lazarus, 1981; DeLongis, Folkman, & Lazarus, 1988; Folkman & Lazarus, 1980), developed the Ways of Coping scale (WOC), one of numerous published coping scales in the past several years (Aldwin & Revension, 1987).

Felton, Revension, and Hinrichsen (1984) reported a modest relationship between (WOC) scores and adjustment to chronic illness. Choice of coping strategy was not related to medical diagnosis, but was related to adjustment. Frank et al. (1987) and Folkman, Lazarus, Gruen, and DeLongis (1986) found patients who attempted fewer coping strategies reflected by low scores on the WOC were not as distressed or depressed as those attempting more coping. Perhaps even more thought provoking was the finding reported by Silver and Wortman (1980) that unrealistic beliefs among spinal injury patients regarding their potentials for improvement lead to better emotional functioning and adjustment.

Regarding specific coping strategies, Buckelew, Frank, Elliot, Chaney, and Hewett (1991) defined three groups of spinal injury patients (high, medium and low distress) by scores on the SCL-90-R. Using the WOC, they found the "high distress" group scored higher on Wish-Fulfilling Fantasy, Emotional Expression, Self Blame, and Threat Minimization subscales. The authors concluded that these strategies may not be effective in managing the psychological distress associated with spinal cord injury. There were no specific coping styles related to the "low distress" group.

Coca (1991) found support for choice of one strategy over another. She related scores on the revised WOC (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) to scores on the Acceptance of Disability Scale. High scores on the Planful Problem-Solving subscale of the WOC were associated with successful adjustment, and high Escape-Avoidance subscale scores were predictive of poor adjustment. Implications for treatment suggest promoting specific coping strategies and discouraging others. Before such efforts are attempted, research into coping scales as well as the adjustment processes must continue if meaningful data are to be distilled.

Further studies are needed which employ sequential objective measures of coping, distress and depression, to include the full range of patients in acute phases of injury as well as the growing numbers of aging spinal cord injury patients (Eisenberg & Saltz, 1991; Trieschmann, 1987). It would not be surprising to find that the adjustment process and variables related to success in the acute phase may be quite different from those in the long term. Also, young acutely injured patients may employ coping strategies that are quite different from those used by an older acutely injured patient (Krause & Crewe, 1991; Shulz & Decker, 1985).

Prerequisite to progress in these areas, staff must first accept the patient's emotional expressions as genuine and relevant instead of interpreting them as denial, depression, anger, or some other transient emotion representing pre-ordained stages of adjustment. Research has demonstrated that people may show optimism, and not necessarily be "in denial". They may be sad and express grief, yet not suffer major depression. Behaviors such as substance abuse and acting-out may not be excused as reactions to the injury, but may reflect faulty coping with life in general. Behaviors associated with independence, often cited as examples of non-compliance, may be exacerbated by the confrontive and often restrictive rehabilitation environment.

Patients bring into the rehabilitation setting all of their collective persona and coping history. Some are successful at coping with the changes, while others rely on coping styles that have been marginally successful in the past. One definition of mental health is "the ability to adapt to change." When patients with poor coping skills are faced with rapid change associated with an injury, they may exhibit poor adjustment.

Once individual behaviors are accepted and objectively measured, instead of interpreted by clinical intuition, the focus on coping style may be sharpened for study. If research identifies a relationship between scores on certain coping measures and successful adjustment, treatment may be planned to increase behaviors associated with these coping styles (Nieves, Charter, & Aspinall, 1991). For example, Elliott, Herrick, et al. (1991) reported a relationship between assertion skills and depression in spinal cord injury patients. As a result, they recommend assertion training for people with disabilities. Trieschmann (1992) outlines several areas for research such as teaching alternate coping skills to patients with substance abuse, examining the coping style of women with spinal cord injury and older adults who have lived many decades with spinal cord injury.

Costs for rehabilitation alone (i.e., not including acute care) at the authors' facility is $96,000 for paraplegics and $144,000 for quadriplegic patients. Failure to maximize this investment adds inestimable burdens to the patient and

family as well as the health care system.

References

Aldwin, C.M., & Revension, T.A. (1987). Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 337-348.

Bodenhamer, E., Achterberg-Lawlis, J., Kevorkian, G., Belanus, A., & Cofer, J. (1983). Staff and patient perceptions of the psychosocial concerns of spinal cord injured persons. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 62, 182-193.

Bracken, M.B., & Bernstein, M. (1980). Adaptation to and coping with disability one year after spinal cord injury: An epidemiological study. Social Psychiatry, 15, 33-41.

Bracken, M.B., & Shepard, M.J. (1980). Coping and adaptation following acute spinal cord injury: A theoretical analysis. Paraplegia, 18, 74-85.

Buckelew, S.S., Frank, R.G., Elliot, T.R., Chaney, J., & Hewett, J. (1991). Adjustment to spinal cord injury: Stage theory revisited. Paraplegia, 29, 125-130.

Coca, B. (1991). Coping, social support and acceptance of disability among persons with SCI. Poster presentation, 99th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, Calif.

Cook, D. (1979). Psychological adjustment to spinal cord injury; incidence of denial, depression and anxiety. Rehabilitation Psychology, 26, 97-104.

Coyne, J.C., Aldwin, C., & Lazarus, R.S. (1981). Depression and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 439-447.

Cushman, L.A., & Dijkers, M.P. (1990). Depressed mood in spinal cord injured patients: Staff perception and patient realities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 191-196.

DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as moderators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 486-495.

Eisenberg, M.G., & Saltz, C.C. (1991). Quality of life among aging spinal cord injured persons: Long term rehabilitation outcomes. Paraplegia, 29, 514-520.

Elliott, T.R., Herrick, S.M., Patti, A.M., Witty, T.E., Godshall, F.J., & Spruell, M. (1991). Assertiveness, social support, and psychological adjustment following spinal cord injury. Behavior Research and Therapy, 29(5), 485-493.

Elliott, T.R., Witty, T.E., Herrick, S., & Hoffman, J.T. (1991). Negotiating reality after physical loss: Hope, depression and disability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 608-613.

Ernst, F.A. (1987). Contrasting perception of distress by research personnel and their spinal cord injured subjects. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 66, 12-15.

Feifel, H., Strack, S., & Nagy, V.T. (1987). Coping strategies and associated features of medically ill patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 616-625.

Felton, B.J., Revension, T.A., & Hinrichsen, G.A. (1984). Stress and coping in the explanation of the psychological adjustment among chronically ill adults. Social Science and Medicine, 18, 889-898.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R.S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, Ca.: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S., Green, R.J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 571-579.

Frank, R.G., & Elliott, T.R. (1987). Life stress and psychologic adjustment following spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 344-347.

Frank, R.G., Van Valin, P.H., & Elliot, T.R. (1987). Adjustment to spinal cord injury: A review of empirical and nonempirical studies. Journal of Rehabilitation, 52, 43-48.

Frisbie, J.H., & Kache, A. (1983). Increasing survival and changing causes of death in myelopathy patients. Journal of the American Paraplegia Society, 6(3), 51-56.

Geisler, W.O., Jousse, A.T., Wynne-Jones, M., & Breithaupt, D. (1983). Survival in traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 21, 364-373.

Guttmann, L. (1976). Spinal Cord Injuries: Comprehensive Management and Research. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Hammell, K.R. (1992). Psychological and sociological theories concerning adjustment to traumatic spinal cord injury: the implications for rehabilitation. Paraplegia, 30, 317-326.

Harris, P., Patel, S., Greer, W., & Naughton, J. (1973). Psychological and social reactions to acute spinal paralysis. Paraplegia, 11, 132-136.

Hohman, G.W. (1975). Psychological aspects of treatment and rehabilitation of the spinal cord injured person. Clinical Orthopedics, 112, 81-88.

Howell, T., Fullerton, D.T., Harvey, R.F., & Klein, M. (1981). Depression in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia, 19, 284-288.

Judd, F.K., & Brown, D.J. (1992). Suicide following acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 30, 173-177.

Judd, F.K., Brown, D.J., & Burrows, G.D. (1991). Depression, Disease and Disability: Application to patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 29, 91-96.

Judd, F.K., Burrows, G.D., & Brown, D.J. (1986). Depression following acute spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 24, 358-363.

Judd, F.K., Stone, J., Webber, J.E., Brown, D.J., & Burrows, G.D. (1989). Depression following spinal cord injury: A prospective in-patient study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 668-671.

Kerr, W., & Thompson, M. (1972). Acceptance of disability of sudden onset in paraplegia. International Journal of Paraplegia, 10, 94-102.

Krause, J.S., & Crewe, N.M. (1990). Long term prediction of self-reported problems following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 28, 186-202.

Krause, J.S., & Crewe, N.M. (1991). Chronologic age, time since injury, and time of measurement: Effect on adjustment after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 91-100.

Malec, J., & Neimeyer, R. (1983). Psychologic prediction of duration of inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation and performance of self care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 64, 359-363.

Mueller, A.D., & Thompson, C.E. (1950). Psychological aspects of problems in spinal cord injury. Occupational Therapy Rehabilitation, 29, 86-95.

Nestoros, J.N., Demers-Desrosiers, L.A., & Dalicandro, L.A. (1982). Levels of anxiety and depression in spinal cord-injured patients. Psychosomatics, 23(8), 823-827.

Nieves, C.C., Chatter, R.A., & Aspinall, M.J. (1991). Relationship between effective coping and perceived quality of life in spinal cord injured patients. Rehabilitation Nursing, 16(3), 129-132.

Ray, C., & West, J. (1984). Coping with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia, 22, 249-259.

Richards, J.S. (1986). Psychologic adjustment to spinal cord injury during the first postdischarge year. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 362-367.

Roberts, A.H. (1972). Spinal cord injury - some psychological considerations. Minnesota Medicine, 55, 1115-1117.

Shulz, R., & Decker, S. (1985). Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1162-1172.

Siller, J. (1969). Psychological situation of disabled with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Literature, 30, 290-296.

Silver, R.L., & Wortman, C.B. (1980). Coping with undesirable life events. In J. Garber & M. Seligemen (Eds.), Human helplessness: Theory and application (pp. 279-375). NY: Academic Press.

Snyder, C.R. (1989). Reality negotiation: from excuses to hope and beyond. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 130-157.

Trieschmann, R.B. (1980). Spinal Cord Injuries: Psychological, Social, and Vocational Adjustment. New York: Pergammon Press.

Trieschmann, R.B. (1987). Aging With a Disability. NY: Demos Publications.

Trieschmann, R.B. (1992). Psychosocial research in spinal cord injury: the state of the art. Paraplegia, 30, 58-60.

Wittkower, E.D., Gingras, G., Mergler, L., Wigdor, B., & Lepine, A. (1954). Combined psychosocial study of spinal cord lesions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 71, 109-111.

Douglas Cairns, Ph.D., Head Clinical Psychologist, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, 7601 E. Imperial Hwy., Downey, Ca. 90242
COPYRIGHT 1993 National Rehabilitation Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Baker, John
Publication:The Journal of Rehabilitation
Date:Oct 1, 1993
Words:2625
Previous Article:A model for the interpretation of personality assessments of individuals with visual impairments.
Next Article:Social adjustment scale assessments in traumatic brain injury.
Topics:


Related Articles
Depressed mood during rehabilitation of persons with spinal injury.
Traumatic brain injury occurring with spinal cord injury: significance for rehabilitation.
X rays speed healing of rat spinal cords.
Quality of life after spinal cord injury.
Psychosocial Adaptation to Heart Diseases: The Role of Coping Strategies.
Life Satisfaction Among Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters