Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,725,466 articles and books

Adaptability and stability of semilate and late maturing soybean genotypes in Minas Gerais state.

Introduction

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is grown in several regions of the world, in a wide range of environments. This significantly affects the grain yield of the different genotypes due to the genotype x environment (GE) interaction. It is believed that this interaction plays a key role in phenotypic expression, and must be estimated and considered when indicating cultivars for breeding programs (PRADO et al., 2001).

Although breeders in general tend to interpret the GE interaction (which in this case represents a barrier to high heritability and gain from selection) as negative, it must be remembered that significant interactions associated with predictable environmental characteristics represent an opportunity for high yields. However, in specific cases, the positive effect of GE interaction can be useful for plant breeders, and the interaction is therefore not only a problem but also an opportunity to be exploited. Adaptation of genotypes to specific environments can make the difference between a good and an excellent variety (GAUCH; ZOBEL, 1996). But, in order to explore these positive interaction effects, statistical methods capable of capturing such information are needed.

To know the GE interaction, many alternatives have been and are being proposed, e.g., the analysis of phenotypic stability and adaptability using linear regression models (EBERHART; RUSSELL, 1966; SILVA; BARRETO, 1986; CRUZ et al., 1989). These analyses have been used to evaluate yield adaptability and stability of different crops in different environments (SILVA; DUARTE, 2006; MAIA et al., 2006, BARROS et al., 2008).

Several analysis methods of the GE interaction and of adaptability and stability do not make use of linear regression, for example: the method of Lin and Binns (1988), Annicchiarico (1992) and the Centroid method for adaptability analysis (ROCHA et al., 2005), among others. These methods are also used for GE interaction analysis in different crops (CARVALHO et al., 2002b; VICENTE et al., 2004). Silva and Duarte (2006) however recommend the use of either the method of Annicchiarico or of Lin and Binns, since the two are strongly associated, which would not justify the use of both.

In the method proposed by Annicchiarico (1992), stability is measured by the superiority of a genotype in relation to the mean of each environment. This method is based on the estimation of an index of recommendation or confidence, which measures the probability that the performance of a given genotype is superior over the others.

The Centroid method of adaptability analysis allows the analysis of genotypes with enhanced exploitation of the GE interaction. This method compares the values of Cartesian distance between the genotypes and reference points (ideotypes), created based on experimental data (ROCHA et al., 2005). The method has been used for adaptability analysis in different crops: eucalyptus (ROCHA et al., 2005), soybean (PELUZIO et al., 2008), alfalfa (VASCONCELOS et al., 2008). A modification of this method was proposed by Nascimento et al. (2009), generating the Integrated method for analysis of adaptability and phenotypic stability.

The purpose of this study was to estimate the adaptability and phenotypic stability of grain yield of soybean genotypes by two analyses methods (Integrated and Annicchiarico) to identify the bestperforming soybean genotypes in different environments.

Material and methods

Semilate and late soybean lines and cultivars were evaluated in the final testing of agronomic evaluation of the performance of the Soybean Improvement Program in the Department of Crop Production, Federal University of Vicosa, conducted in the State of Minas Gerais, in two growing seasons, 2006/2007 and 2007/2008. The experiments were conducted at three locations: Vicosa, Florestal and Sao Gotardo, all in both growing seasons.

In 2006, sowing was performed on December 1, 2, 12 in Vicosa, Florestal and Sao Gotardo, respectively. In 2007, sowing was done on November 9 and 29 and December 12, in Vicosa, Florestal and Sao Gotardo, respectively.

Fertilization was performed in the planting hole with 250 kg [ha.sup.-1] of the compound NPK fertilizer 0020-20 in all experiments of the 2006/2007 growing season. The same dose of a single fertilizer was used in the growing season 2007/2008, except in Florestal, where 360 kg [ha.sup.-1] of NPK fertilizer 00-20-20 was applied in the planting hole. Fertilizer was applied based on soil analysis.

The experimental design of each field experiments was based on randomized blocks with three replications. The plots consisted of four 5-mlong rows spaced 0.5 m apart and plants were thinned to 14 per meter. The genotype yield was determined based on the production of a 4.0 [m.sup.2] area, corresponding to the two central rows, 4 m long, discarding 0.5 m at either end. Cultural treatments were applied whenever necessary and according to the crop development.

The same ten lines and four cultivars were evaluated at all locations and in all growing seasons: Conquista; CS 02449; CS 02736; Monarca; UFV 18; UFV Pop V-15; UFV Pop V-5; UFV Pop V-7; UFV TN 105; UFV01823281B; UFV01878397B; UFV01928443B; UFV998972162 and UFV99CRR768.

The experiments were analyzed in a triple factorial design, with 2 growing seasons, 3 locations and 14 genotypes (2x3x 14). For the GE interaction analysis (G--genotypes and E--environments), the two growing seasons and three locations were designated as agricultural environments, generating six different environments. The experiments conducted in Vicosa, Florestal and Sao Gotardo in the 2006/2007 growing season generated environment one, two and three, respectively and environment four, five and six, in the 2007/2008 growing season.

The errors of the yield data were tested for normality (Lilliefors test), to check the need for a transformation. Individual analysis of variance of data was performed to verify the homogeneity of variance (Cochram test), whether transformation was needed or not, of the number of degrees of freedom of the residue for the combined analysis.

The following methods were used to analyze adaptability and stability of grain yield of the different soybean genotypes under environmental variations: method of Annicchiarico (1992) and the Integrated Method of adaptability and stability analysis. Statistical analyses were run using software "Genes" (CRUZ, 2006).

Results and discussion

The errors showed normal distribution by the Lilliefors test, facilitating the use of parametric analyses and homogeneity of variance by the method of Cochram, allowing the application of variance analysis. The relationship between the largest and the smallest mean square was 3.13 (Table 1). An adjustment of the degrees of freedom of the residue for the combined analysis of the experiments was not required.

The analysis of variance (Table 1) indicated the existence of significant interaction between growing seasons, locations and genotypes, suggesting a differential performance of genotypes within each site in each growing season (environment). Regarding soybean yield, several authors (DI MAURO et al., 2000; CARVALHO et al., 2002a; YOKOMIZO et al., 2000) verified the existence of interaction between genotypes and environments. They classified the causes of this interaction as related to physiological and adaptive factors and to the scale of variable measurement.

Table 1 shows the [R.sup.2] values, which indicate the magnitude of GE interaction (already considering environments as the association of the different growing seasons with the different locations). The GE interaction was decomposed into the effects of genotype x growing season, genotype x location and genotype x location x growing season, which were all quantified. Thereby it is possible to check how much each one contributes to the GE interaction. The results indicated that the genotype x location x growing season (G x L x Y) contributed most to the GE interaction, calling for a more detailed study).

Due to the interaction detected between genotypes and environments (locations and growing seasons), the adaptability and stability of grain yield was analyzed by the method of Annicchiarico (Table 2) and by the Integrated Method of adaptability and stability analysis (Table 3). For these tests, the different locations in each growing season were considered environments; consequently, the two growing seasons at three locations represented six environments.

The results of the GE interaction analysis by the method of Annicchiarico are listed in Table 2. The recommendation index of the cultivars Conquista, Monarca and UFV TN 105 was above 100 for favorable and unfavorable environments and in general. These results indicate that these genotypes have a high mean and lower standard deviation between their means and the environmental means (CRUZ; CARNEIRO, 2006) and were therefore indicated as the genotypes with highest adaptability and stability by the method of Annicchiarico. The reason is that the index generated by the Annicchiarico method is a measure of how adapted the genotype in question is. Since this index deals with the variation of the genotype in relation to the environmental quality, the method of Annicchiarico considers genotypes with minor variations as more stable plant material, when used in environments in general. The analysis of favorable and unfavorable environments gives an idea of the adaptability of these genotypes. Consequently, this method allows inferences about the adaptability and stability of the genotypes.

The recommendation index for unfavorable environments of the lines CS 02449 and CS 02736 was above 100. Theses lines were therefore adapted to unfavorable environmental conditions only, where, generally speaking, less investments are made. The recommendation index of line UFV01 928443B for favorable environments was above 100 and was classified as adapted to favorable environmental conditions by the method of Annicchiarico (1992). This means that this genotype can be recommended for the condition of low investment only, which is not very desirable, in the practice.

Table 3 shows the results of the Integrated Method of adaptability and stability analysis of grain yield of the genotypes evaluated. This method generates a probability value associated with the distance between the genotype and ideotype, referring to the chance of the genotype study to be closer to a given ideotype. The ideotype are determined by the method for integrated analysis of adaptability and phenotypic stability (NASCIMENTO et al., 2009). Thus, the highest value of probability for each genotype indicates to which class of stability and adaptability it belongs.

The specific adaptability to favorable and unfavorable environments of the genotypes CS 02449 and UFV TN 105 was classified as maximum for stability by the Integrated Method. This means that the response of the genotypes CS02449 and UFV TN 105 was positive to the environmental conditions with sufficient input and also to rougher environmental conditions, with a lower technology level.

When the adaptability of a given genotype is classified as general by the Integrated Method, this indicates that the yield was close to the maximum at all experimental locations, which is one of the main objectives of breeders. The adaptability to environments of cultivar Monarca was general, because the probability value of Monarca belonging to class I was highest. The phenotypic stability of the other genotypes was classified as maximum and the probability of being close to the mean yield in each environment was great (ideotype V) (Table 3). In the case of the Integrated Method, which is a method that makes use of multivariate analysis to determine the adaptability, we can infer that the genotypes with a close to average performance in all environments will be classified as genotypes with general stability (class V). The performance expected from this genotype is therefore average in the different cultivation environments.

Barros et al. (2008) investigated soybean genotypes in Rondonopolis, Campo Verde, Nova Brazilandia and in Vera, in the State of Mato Grosso, to find that the methods of Lin and Binns, Annicchiarico and Centroid are mutually consistent and can identify the genotypes with highest yield, stability and adaptability. Silva and Duarte (2006) recommend the use of the method of Annicchiarico to analyze adaptability and phenotypic stability in soybean, since this method is strongly associated with the method of Lin and Binns for the analysis of GE interaction. When processed by the Annicchiarico and Integrated methods, the data obtained in this study also indicated three genotypes (Monarca, CS 02449 and UFV TN 105) as best in terms of adaptability and phenotypic stability in the evaluation environments.

Conclusion

The method of Annicchiarico classified the adaptability to the evaluation environments of the genotypes Conquista, Monarca and UFV TN 105 as general, indicating them for recommendation for planting at different locations, with different technology levels.

Line CS 02449 and cultivar UFV TN 105 were classified as adapted to favorable environmental conditions, while the performance was intermediate, even in unfavorable environments, by the Integrated Method of adaptability and stability analysis.

The adaptability and yield stability of cultivar Monarca was classified as high by the method of Annicchiarico and by the Integrated Method of adaptability and stability analysis.

DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v32i3.8249

Received on September 15, 2009.

Accepted on December 12, 2009.

References

ANNICCHIARICO, P. Cultivar adaptation and recommendation from alfafa trials in Northern Italy. Journal of Genetics and Breeding, v. 46, n. 1, p. 269-278, 1992.

BARROS, H. B.; SEDIYAMA, T.; TEIXEIRA, R. C.; CRUZ, C. D. Analises parametricas e nao-parametricas para determinacao da adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genotipos de soja. Scientia Agraria, v. 9, n. 3, p. 299-309, 2008.

CARVALHO, C. G. P.; ARIAS, C. A. A.; TOLEDO, J. F. F.; ALMEIDA, L. A.; KIIHL, R. A. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. F. Interacao genotipos x ambientes no desempenho produtivo da soja no Parana. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 37, n. 7, p. 989-1000, 2002a.

CARVALHO, H. W. L.; SILVA, M. L.; CARDOSO, M. J.; SANTOS, M. X.; TABOSA, J. N.; CARVALHO, C. L.; LIRA, M. A. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de milho no Nordeste brasileiro no trienio de 1998 a 2000. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 37, n. 11, p. 1581-1588, 2002b.

CRUZ, C. D. Programa GENES: estatistica experimental e matrizes. 1. ed., Vicosa: UFV, 2006.

CRUZ, C. D.; CARNEIRO, P. C. S. Modelos biometricos aplicados ao melhoramento genetico. 2. ed., Vicosa: UFV, 2006.

CRUZ, C. D.; TORRES, R. A.; VENCOVSKY, R. An alternative approach to the stability analysis proposed by Silva and Barreto. Revista Brasileira de Genetica, v. 12, n. 3, p. 567-580, 1989.

DI MAURO, A. O.; CURCIOLI, V. B.; NOBREGA, J. C. M.; BANZATO, D. A.; SEDIYAMA, T. Correlacao entre medidas parametricas e nao-parametricas de estabilidade em soja. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 35, n. 4, p. 687-696, 2000.

EBERHART, S. A.; RUSSELL, W. A. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, v. 6, n. 1, p. 36-40, 1966.

GAUCH, H. G.; ZOBEL, R. W. AMMI analyses of yield trials. In: KANG, M. S.; GAUCH, H. G. (Ed.). Genotype by environment interaction. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996. p. 85-122.

LIN, C. S.; BINNS, M. R. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivars x location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, v. 68, n. 1, p. 193-198, 1988.

MAIA, M. C. C.; VELLO, N. A.; ROCHA, M. M.; PINHEIRO, J. B.; SILVA, N. F. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de linhagens experimentais de soja selecionadas para caracteres agronomicos atraves de metodo uni-multivariado. Bragantia, v. 65, n. 2, p. 215-226, 2006.

NASCIMENTO, M.; CRUZ, C. D.; CAMPANA, A. C. M.; TOMAZ, R. S.; SALGADO, C. C.; FERREIRA, R. P. Alteracao no metodo centroide de avaliacao da adaptabilidade genotipica. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 44, n. 3, p. 263-269, 2009.

PELUZIO, J. M.; FIDELIS, R. R.; GIONGO, P.; SILVA, J. C.; CAPPELLARI, D.; BARROS, H. B. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de soja em quatro epocas de semeadura no sul do Estado do Tocantins. Revista Ceres, v. 55, n. 1, p. 34-40, 2008.

PRADO, E. E. P.; HIRIMOTO, D. M.; GODINHO, V. P. C.; UTUMI, M. M.; RAMALHO, A. R. Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de soja em cinco epocas de plantio no cerrado de Rondonia. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 36, n. 4, p. 625-635, 2001.

ROCHA, R. B., MURO-ABAD, J. I., ARAUJO, E. F., CRUZ, C. D. Avaliacao do metodo do Centroide para estudo de adaptabilidade ao ambiente de clones de Eucalyptus grandis. Ciencia Florestal, v. 15, n. 3, p. 255-266, 2005.

SILVA, J. G. C.; BARRETO, J. N. An application of segmented linear regression to the study of genotype x environment interaction. Biometrics, v. 41, n. 4, p. 1093-1093, 1986.

SILVA, W. C. J.; DUARTE, J. B. Metodos estatisticos para estudo de adaptabilidade e estabilidade fenotipica em soja. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 41, n. 1, p. 23-30, 2006.

VASCONCELOS, E. S.; BARIONI JUNIOR, W.; CRUZ, C. D.; FERREIRA, R. P.; RASSINI, J. B.; VILELA, D. Selecao de genotipos de alfafa pela adaptabilidade e estabilidade da producao de materia seca. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 339-343, 2008.

VICENTE, D.; PINTO, R. J. B.; SCAPIM, C. A. Analise da adaptabilidade e estabilidade de linhagens elite de soja. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, v. 26, n. 3, p. 301-307, 2004.

YOKOMIZO, G. K.; DUARTE, J. B.; VELLO, N. A.; Correlacoes fenotipicas entre tamanho de graos e outros caracteres em topo cruzamento de soja tipo alimento com tipo grao. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v. 35, n. 11, p. 2235-2241, 2000.

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Edmar Soares de Vasconcelos (1) *, Mucio Silva Reis (2), Cosme Damiao Cruz (3), Tuneo Sediyama (2) and Carlos Alberto Scapim (4)

(1) Departamento de Engenharia Agricola, Centro de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Rod. PR 182, km 45, BR 182, 87200-000, Cidade Gaucha, Parana, Brazil. (2) Departamento de Fitotecnia, Centro de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (3) Departamento de Biologia Geral, Centro de Ciencias Biologicas e da Saude, Universidade Federal de Vicosa, Vicosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil. (4) Departamento de Agronomia, Centro de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, Parana, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: vasconceloses@pop.com.br

Table 1. Summary of analysis of variance of the yield data of
semilate/late soybean cultivars and lines established in the final
tests (EFIs) of the UFV soybean breeding program, conducted at
different locations in the State of Minas Gerais in the growing
seasons 2006/2007 and 2007/2008.

Sources of variation   DF        MS        Probabi-        [R.sup.2]
                                           lity of
                                            Error
                                            type I

(Blocks/Locations)/    12     442696.40       --      --      --
Growing season
Genotypes (G)          13    1141675.83      0.02     *       --
Growing seasons (Y)     1    93167488.40     0.19     NS      --
Locations (L)           2    46931420.38     0.35     NS      --
G x Y                  13     400456.20      1.00     NS    11.73
G x L                  26     619305.70      1.00     NS    36.28
Y x L                   2    25023978.74     0.00     **      --
G x L x Y              26     887480.62      0.00     **    51.99
Error                  156    249952.03       --      --      --

Total                  251

Mean                                                    2310.19
CV. (%)                                                  21.64
Difference between the greatest and smallest MS Error    3.13

(NS) NS--not significant by the F test, **, *Significant at 1 and
5% probability level by the F test, respectively; [R.sup.2]- Value
of the contribution of the above variation sources to the
GE interaction.

Table 2. Adaptability and phenotypic stability of grain yield of
semilate/late soybean cultivars and lines established in the final
tests (EFIs) of the UFV soybean breeding program, conducted at
different locations in the State of Minas Gerais in the growing
seasons 2006/2007 and 2007/2008, by the method of Annicchiarico.

Genotypes      Mean         Recommendation Index for
                          Environments [[omega].sub.i]

                         General   Unfavorable   Favorable

Conquista      2508.19   106.38      107.33       103.53
CS 02449       2486.53   100.04      113.29        75.30
CS 02736       2499.44    98.90      102.32        89.50
Monarca        2829.58   116.89      112.50       124.31
UFV 18         2110.56    79.61       74.98        87.39
UFV Pop V-15   2300.42    92.43       89.81        98.10
UFV Pop V-5    2172.50    86.80       82.33        96.74
UFV Pop V-7    2134.44    88.62       85.79        92.76
UFV TN 105     2674.44   111.71      111.77       113.98
UFV01823281B   2057.36    86.68       93.12        77.30
UFV01878397B   2144.72    88.80       86.29        94.03
UFV01928443B   2268.75    90.04       81.74       110.71
UFV998972162   2190.69    91.54       90.38        94.57
UFV99CRR768    1965.08    80.68       78.41        83.88

Table 3. Adaptability and phenotypic stability of grain yield of
semilate/late soybean cultivars and lines established in the
final tests (EFIs) of the UFV soybean breeding program, conducted
at different locations in the State of Minas Gerais in the
2006/2007 and 2007/2008 growing seasons, by the Integrated Method
of adaptability and stability analysis.

Genotypes      Mean      Class   Probability of belonging to a
                                        particular class

                                  I      II    III     IV     V

Conquista      2508.19     V     0.13   0.09   0.12   0.09   0.24
CS 02449       2486.53    VII    0.12   0.09   0.17   0.10   0.19
CS 02736       2499.44     V     0.15   0.12   0.12   0.10   0.19
Monarca        2829.58     I     0.25   0.10   0.09   0.07   0.14
UFV 18         2110.56     V     0.10   0.15   0.10   0.15   0.24
UFV Pop V-15   2300.42     V     0.10   0.12   0.10   0.12   0.29
UFV Pop V-5    2172.50     V     0.10   0.12   0.11   0.15   0.27
UFV Pop V-7    2134.44     V     0.10   0.12   0.12   0.15   0.25
UFV TN 105     2674.44    VII    0.18   0.10   0.10   0.08   0.18
UFV01823281B   2057.36     V     0.09   0.10   0.16   0.20   0.22
UFV01878397B   2144.72     V     0.08   0.10   0.10   0.13   0.34
UFV01928443B   2268.75     V     0.10   0.17   0.08   0.11   0.25
UFV998972162   2190.69     V     0.08   0.09   0.10   0.12   0.38
UFV99CRR768    1965.08     V     0.09   0.11   0.12   0.22   0.22

Genotypes      Probability of belonging
               to a particular class

                VI    VII

Conquista      0.13   0.20
CS 02449       0.12   0.21
CS 02736       0.16   0.17
Monarca        0.19   0.16
UFV 18         0.15   0.12
UFV Pop V-15   0.14   0.13
UFV Pop V-5    0.13   0.12
UFV Pop V-7    0.13   0.14
UFV TN 105     0.16   0.20
UFV01823281B   0.11   0.14
UFV01878397B   0.11   0.12
UFV01928443B   0.18   0.11
UFV998972162   0.11   0.11
UFV99CRR768    0.11   0.12

Class I: General Adaptability; Class II: Specific adaptability to
favorable environments; Class III: Specific adaptability to
unfavorable environments and Class IV: Little adapted; Class V:
Maximum phenotypic stability; Class VI: maximum specific
adaptability to favorable environments and stability in
unfavorable environments and Class VII maximum specific
adaptability to unfavorable environments and stability in
favorable environments.
COPYRIGHT 2010 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:texto en ingles
Author:Soares de Vasconcelos, Edmar; Silva Reis, Mucio; Damiao Cruz, Cosme; Sediyama, Tuneo; Scapim, Carlos
Publication:Acta Scientiarum Agronomy (UEM)
Date:Jul 1, 2010
Words:3815
Previous Article:Analysis of the coffee harvesting process using an electromagnetic shaker.
Topics:

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters