Accounting for something: voluntary organisations, accountability and the implications for government funders.Abstract The accountability mechanisms of government contracts are considered less than effective by both the government officials that monitor them and the voluntary organisations that deliver on them. This paper reports on doctoral research that explored what accountability relationships voluntary organisations perceive themselves to be involved in and which relationships they prioritise Verb 1. prioritise - assign a priority to; "we have too many things to do and must prioritize" prioritize grade, rate, rank, place, range, order - assign a rank or rating to; "how would you rank these students?"; "The restaurant is rated highly in the food . The implications of these perceptions of accountability for current mechanisms of contracting are considered. Current mechanisms are modelled on agency theory, which assumes that voluntary organisations have different goals to government agencies. Accountability mechanisms aim to control voluntary organisations' activities to ensure they deliver what government requires. The research findings suggest that the assumed misalignment mis·a·ligned adj. Incorrectly aligned. mis  a·lign ment n. of
goals does not exist, and that both government official and voluntary
organisations aim to provide high-quality services and outcomes for
clients. This provides an opportunity for exploring a new approach to
accountability for contracts.
INTRODUCTION Ministers, officials, voluntary sector managers and board members are generally in agreement that the relationship between the government and the voluntary sector is less effective than it could be. The previous and current administrations have sought to improve this relationship (Maharey 2003). Initiatives have included the establishment in 2000 of the Community and Voluntary Sector Working Party (a group of government and voluntary sector representatives tasked with making recommendations on improving the relationship), the government's 2001 Statement of Intentions for an Improved Community-Government Relationship (2) (which outlines how government will approach the relationship), the establishment of the Office for the Community and Voluntary Sector (which has the aim of improving government's performance in interacting with the voluntary sector), and guidelines issued by Treasury for departments contracting with voluntary organisations. Contracting and funding practices are a focus of the initiatives. These practices are a major source of disquiet from the voluntary sector perspective (Community and Voluntary Sector Working Party 2001). A recent high-profile "contract failure" also highlighted the risks to government of contracting with voluntary organisations (Office of the Auditor General Auditor general may refer to,
Accountability for government contracts and funds is often at the core of disquiet and risk. From a voluntary sector perspective, for example, small organisations find the compliance costs of reporting (such as purchasing a computer See how to select a computer. for the required word-processed reports) particularly onerous. As a result, newly established voluntary organisations that provide services addressing emerging needs (such as refugee communities) can be excluded from funding and contracting processes (Ashton et al. 2004, Majumdar 2004). Changes in department structures and personnel often result in changes in reporting and information requirements The information needed to support a business or other activity. Systems analysts turn information requirements (the what and when) into functional specifications (the how) of an information system. , which, again, can be costly for organisations (Ashton et al. 2004). From a government perspective, social services social services Noun, pl welfare services provided by local authorities or a state agency for people with particular social needs social services npl → servicios mpl sociales and the outcomes to be achieved by them are difficult to specify in a contract and even more difficult to hold an organisation to account for (Klijn and Teisman 2000). Contract outputs risk becoming checklists for delivery and, as such, are not linked to the effectiveness of the service or the outcome desired (Schick 2003) and create opportunities for "creaming" the "easiest" clients and tasks (Klingner et al. 2001, Hill and Lynn 2003). Voluntary organisation employees and volunteers are not state servants. That those delivering the service cannot be controlled by officials through an employment relationship is thought by many commentators to reduce accountability (Behn and Kant 1999). Commentators have also debated how accountable Ministers are to Parliament for vote-funded services that are delivered by organisations that are not part of government. Such debate challenges the notions and boundaries of Ministerial responsibility Ministerial responsibility or Individual ministerial responsibility is a constitutional convention in governments using the Westminster System that a cabinet minister bears the ultimate responsibility for the actions of their ministry or department. (Martin 1995, Mulgan 1997). Arguably ar·gu·a·ble adj. 1. Open to argument: an arguable question, still unresolved. 2. That can be argued plausibly; defensible in argument: three arguable points of law. , if any revision of current contracting practices is to be sustainable, it will have to be appropriate for both parties. The Public Accountability System requirements To be used efficiently, all computer software needs certain hardware components or other software resources to be present on a computer system. These pre-requisites are known as (computer) system requirements and are often used as a guideline as opposed to an absolute rule. of contracting processes are relatively well documented. The System has been modelled by the State Services Commission The State Services Commission (Te Komihana O Nga Tari Kawanatanga in Māori) is a central government agency within the New Zealand government. Its responsibility is essentially to guarantee a high level of civil servants for New Zealand through performance management. (2002) and reviewed (Advisory Group on the Review of the Centre 2001), and its reform in the early 1990s was subject to academic scrutiny (Gregory and Hicks Hicks , Edward 1780-1849. American painter of primitive works, notably The Peaceable Kingdom, of which nearly 100 versions exist. 1999). In contrast, voluntary organisations' accountability systems are less well acknowledged. To whom, for what and why the staff and board members of voluntary organisations are accountable has been given minimal attention, either in New Zealand New Zealand (zē`lənd), island country (2005 est. pop. 4,035,000), 104,454 sq mi (270,534 sq km), in the S Pacific Ocean, over 1,000 mi (1,600 km) SE of Australia. The capital is Wellington; the largest city and leading port is Auckland. or internationally, by researchers or policy makers. Indeed, several prominent voluntary sector researchers have identified this omission (Leat n. 1. An artificial water trench, esp. one to or from a mill. 1996, Ospina et al. 2002). To ensure that any reform of the practices of contract and funding accountability are appropriate for voluntary sector parties, as well as meeting the demands of the Public Accountability System, attention must be given to the-pressures and tensions arising from voluntary organisations' accountability relationships. ACCOUNTABILITY AND VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS Given this context, the author's doctoral research aimed to explore accountability from a voluntary-sector perspective and the implications for government funders. Four voluntary-organisation case studies were undertaken in late 2003. All organisations provided social services. They had a variety of funding arrangements, but all, to some degree, received government funding. Thirty-four staff, management and board members of the organisations were interviewed about their perceptions of to whom, for what and why they thought they were accountable. The qualitative data gained from the in-depth interviews was triangulated with observations of respondents and analysis of key organisational documents (Flick 1992, Yin 1994). ACCOUNTABLE TO WHOM, FOR WHAT AND WHY Clients were the stakeholders Stakeholders All parties that have an interest, financial or otherwise, in a firm-stockholders, creditors, bondholders, employees, customers, management, the community, and the government. to which respondents thought themselves most accountable. Twenty-seven out of 34 respondents considered themselves accountable to their organisations' clients. Staff were the second most important stakeholder stakeholder n. a person having in his/her possession (holding) money or property in which he/she has no interest, right or title, awaiting the outcome of a dispute between two or more claimants to the money or property. to whom accountability was perceived (18 out of 34 respondents), followed by the government (16 respondents), the organisation's governing body Noun 1. governing body - the persons (or committees or departments etc.) who make up a body for the purpose of administering something; "he claims that the present administration is corrupt"; "the governance of an association is responsible to its members"; "he (14 respondents), and the organisations' members (seven respondents). What respondents overwhelmingly thought they were accountable for was the quality of care of their clients (25 out of 34 respondents). They also thought that they were accountable for ensuring clients remained safe while in their care (seven respondents). Attracting enough resources to run the organisation was also mentioned (seven respondents) as was financial prudence (five respondents) and being a good employer (four respondents). The reasons why respondents thought themselves accountable to the organisation's clients was because clients were the reason the organisation existed. Clients were the purpose for the organisation and for their jobs. Respondents also thought themselves accountable to the organisation's staff, to ensure that they were happy and thus provided good care for clients. Retaining good staff was the driver behind this accountability relationship. Accountability to government was based on delivering on the outputs specified in their government contracts for service provision and for complying with regulations. In summary, respondents perceived that they were most accountable to their clients. Providing a high-quality service to clients was the reason for their organisation's existence. Accountability relationships within the organisation were of secondary importance. There was a strong chain of internal command and control, as well as a degree of collegial col·le·gi·al adj. 1. a. Characterized by or having power and authority vested equally among colleagues: "He . . . obligation. These internal relationships were based on ensuring high-quality services were delivered. Accountability to government agencies for funds and compliance was perceived as third most important. Regulatory compliance was seen as a necessary evil and government funding as an input needed to provide services to clients. These findings were somewhat unexpected. Key theories--resource dependency and stakeholder analyses--predict that respondents would perceive themselves most accountable to their key funder, which in most cases was a government agency. Resource dependency theory Dependency theory is a body of social science theories, both from developed and developing nations, that are predicated on the notion that there is a center of wealthy states and a periphery of poor, underdeveloped states. predicts that organisations will feel beholden be·hold·en adj. Owing something, such as gratitude, to another; indebted. [Middle English biholden, past participle of biholden, to observe; see behold. to a key funder. In order to avoid control by a key funder, organisations seek multiple sources (Pfeffer and Salancik 1978). Stakeholder analyses predict that the stakeholders to whom an organisation will feel most obliged o·blige v. o·bliged, o·blig·ing, o·blig·es v.tr. 1. To constrain by physical, legal, social, or moral means. 2. are those that are perceived as powerful, with legitimate and urgent demands on the organisation. Key funders fit this description (Mitchell et al. 1997, Agle et al. 1999). Indeed, previous research in the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. and among non-government organisations had shown the importance placed on the main funder (van der Heijden 1987, Gronbjerg 1993, Hardina 1993). The literature suggests clients were dismissed as an important stakeholder as they officially had no power over the organisation (Bruce 1995) and were difficult to account to anyway because they were perceived unable to judge the quality of services they received (Hoyes et al. 1993, Rochester 1995, Taylor 1996, Robson et al. 1997). In this research, however, clients and the quality of care provided to them was the top priority for respondents. Accountability to government and other funders was a "means to an end". ACCOUNTING TO CLIENTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT FUNDERS That nearly all 34 respondents in all four case studies felt themselves most accountable to their clients raises an important challenge to the current mechanisms of government and voluntary sector contracting. Current mechanisms are based on the assumptions of agency theory (Anderson and Dovey 2003). A principal (government agency) contracts with an agent (voluntary organisation) to deliver services on their behalf. The agent is assumed to have different interests from the principal and as such will act self-interestedly when the opportunity arises. To ensure the agent does what the principal expects them to do, external monitoring, reporting, sanctions and incentives are put in place (Jenkins and Meckling 1976). The research findings, however, suggest that at some level voluntary organisations and government agencies have similar interests--achieving positive outcomes for clients--and that voluntary organisations are not predestined pre·des·tine tr.v. pre·des·tined, pre·des·tin·ing, pre·des·tines 1. To fix upon, decide, or decree in advance; foreordain. 2. Theology To foreordain or elect by divine will or decree. to shirk shirk In Islam, idolatry and polytheism, both of which are regarded as heretical. The Qu'ran stresses that God does not share his powers with any partner (sharik) and warns that those who believe in idols will be harshly dealt with on the Day of Judgment. from providing high-quality services. Indeed, most interviewees took personal responsibility for providing high-quality services to their clients. While there may be differences in approaches to service provision, and even differences in defining what constitutes "quality", the agency theory assumptions of a fundamental conflict between principal and agent are challenged by these research findings. In terms of reform of the accountability mechanisms of contracting, these results suggest that a "do the same but better" approach may not be fruitful. In light of these findings, implementing higher levels of external monitoring, additional reporting requirements and incentive-based regimes that aim to control the assumed divergent tendencies of the agent are unlikely to be successful for either party. From the government perspective, investing additional resources into attempting to control agents who actually have similar goals is unlikely to increase accountability or their performance. From the voluntary sector perspective, additional monitoring and reporting detracts from their ability to deliver services. Instead, revised contracting practices could acknowledge the potential for commonality com·mon·al·i·ty n. pl. com·mon·al·i·ties 1. a. The possession, along with another or others, of a certain attribute or set of attributes: a political movement's commonality of purpose. and take as a starting point Noun 1. starting point - earliest limiting point terminus a quo commencement, get-go, offset, outset, showtime, starting time, beginning, start, kickoff, first - the time at which something is supposed to begin; "they got an early start"; "she knew from the the assumption that both parties are attempting to achieve the best results for clients. In practice, this would mean that government agencies would take the time to understand what the voluntary organisations are trying to achieve, how they are doing it and where there is congruence con·gru·ence n. 1. a. Agreement, harmony, conformity, or correspondence. b. An instance of this: "What an extraordinary congruence of genius and era" of goals. When it is identified that goals are shared, the contracting process can begin. Thus there would be a large investment of time at the beginning of any relationship. Once a relationship was established, however, voluntary organisations could be accorded a degree of discretion to get on with the job. Accountability mechanisms, monitoring, reporting and performance measures, could focus on measuring outcomes for clients. Dialogue between parties could focus on delivery problems and likely improvements or innovations. This approach has the potential to improve accountability for taxpayer funds. Informal types of accountability (such as personal commitment and promises) develop when parties have close relationships and can serve to reinforce formal accountability processes, which can also be strengthened through the collaborative approach to developing meaningful indicators of service performance and client outcomes. The advantages of such an approach are that this degree of discretion can be built into the relationship because officials can be better assured that what they are trying to achieve with the contract is also what the organisation is trying to achieve and accountability mechanisms are based on relevant measures. Time currently invested in monitoring and reporting-type accountability processes could be better used in developing appropriate performance measures and improving service delivery. The information asymmetries Information asymmetry Condition that information is known to some, but not all, participants. that are problematic in principal-agent relationships Principal-agent relationship Occurs when one person, an agent, acts on the behalf of another person, the principal. would still exist--the staff of voluntary organisations would have more information about service delivery than officials--but such asymmetries would not be seen as a potential source of risk for principals (such as an avenue for inflating contract prices), but rather expertise that should be incorporated into policy processes. NO SILVER BULLETS No Silver Bullet - essence and accidents of software engineering is a well-known paper on software engineering written by Fred Brooks in 1986. Brooks argues that there will be no more technologies or practices that will serve as "silver bullets" and create a twofold OR WHITE KNIGHTS White Knight falls off his horse every time it stops. [Br. Lit.: Lewis Carroll Through the Looking-Glass] See : Awkwardness White Knight invents clever objects that never work. [Br. Lit. The suggestion of a "relational" approach to contracting is not new and a number of current initiatives are adopting such approaches. Nor is it without limitations. For example, if, after discussions with a voluntary organisation, it is clear the organisation has different goals to what officials are trying to achieve, officials will seek another provider. In practice, this may mean that organisations currently contracting with government would not be offered future contracts--a potentially difficult and politically volatile stance. Further, questions must be raised about the depth and sustainability of goal alignment as a basis of a relationship. While the managers of voluntary organisations and officials may agree on high-level outcomes, differences about service delivery may override consensus. Meaningful outcome measures are also notoriously difficult to develop. A relational approach also risks generating a "cosy in-crowd", to the exclusion of emerging organisations. A WAY FORWARD Any debate about how much discretion voluntary organisations should be accorded and what the nature of the relationship should be touches on inherent tensions in the public accountability system--the trade-offs required by the competing demands for specification, standardisation, low risk and control on the one hand, and calls for innovation, performance and devolution devolution n. the transfer of rights, powers, or an office (public or private) from one person or government to another. (See: devolve) DEVOLUTION, eccl. law. on the other. Discretion and centralised Adj. 1. centralised - drawn toward a center or brought under the control of a central authority; "centralized control of emergency relief efforts"; "centralized government" centralized control each have costs and risks. Wise scholars since the middle of last century have been debating what seems like an intractable intractable /in·trac·ta·ble/ (in-trak´tah-b'l) resistant to cure, relief, or control. in·trac·ta·ble adj. 1. Difficult to manage or govern; stubborn. 2. issue. What is considered an appropriate balance between the two poles is contested and contextual. Perhaps the way forward starts by reviewing the current untenable context: the accountability mechanisms used to contract and fund voluntary organisations are considered by both parties to be less than satisfactory. The current regime assumes voluntary organisations will behave according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. the predictions of agency theory. This research has found, however, that this assumption needs to be challenged. Instead, accountability mechanisms could take as a starting point the assumption that both parties are trying to achieve similar goals. This would lead to a more relational approach. While it is acknowledged that such an approach generates political and operational difficulties, assumptions of goal alignment could be built into processes as much as possible. This could help maximise the service outcomes desired by both government officials and the voluntary organisations they help to fund. REFERENCES Advisory Group on the Review of the Centre (2001) Report of the Advisory Group on the Review of the Centre, Treasury, Wellington. Agle, B., R. Mitchell and J. Sonnenfeld (1999) "Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience sa·li·ence also sa·li·en·cy n. pl. sa·li·en·ces also sa·li·en·cies 1. The quality or condition of being salient. 2. A pronounced feature or part; a highlight. Noun 1. , corporate performance and CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. values" Academy of Management Journal, 42:507-525. Anderson, B. and L. Dovey (2003) Whither whith·er adv. To what place, result, or condition: Whither are we wandering? conj. 1. To which specified place or position: Accountability?, Working Paper 18, State Services Commission, Wellington. Ashton, T., J. Cumming and J. McLean (2004) "Contracting for health services health services Managed care The benefits covered under a health contract in a public health system: The New Zealand experience" Health Policy, 69:21-31. Behn, R. and P. Kant (1999) "Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting" Public Productivity and Management Review, 22:470-489. Bruce, I. (1995) "Do not-for-profits value their customers and their needs?" International Marketing Review, 12:77-84. Community and Voluntary Sector Working Party (2001) Communities and Government: Potential for Partnership: Whakatopu Whakaaro, Ministry of Social Policy, Wellington. Cribb, J. (2005) The Accountability of Voluntary Organisations: Implications for Government Funders, PhD dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington
Victoria University of Wellington, also known in Māori as , Wellington. Flick, U. (1992) "Triangulation triangulation: see geodesy. The use of two known coordinates to determine the location of a third. Used by ship captains for centuries to navigate on the high seas, triangulation is employed in GPS receivers to pinpoint their current location on earth. revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative?" Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22:175-197. Gregory, R. and C. Hicks (1999) "Promoting public service integrity: A case for responsible accountability" Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58:3-15. Gronbjerg, K. (1993) Understanding Nonprofit Funding: Managing Revenues in Social Services and Community Development, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden . Hardina, D. (1993) "The impact of funding sources and board representation on consumer control of service delivery in organisations serving low income communities" Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 4:69-84. Hill, C. and L. Lynn (2003) "Producing human services: Why do agencies collaborate?" Public Management Review, 5:63-81. Hoyes, L., S. Jeffers, R. Lart, R. Means and M. Taylor (1993) User Empowerment and Reform of Community Care: A Study of Early Implementation in Four Localities, University of Bristol, Bristol. Jenkins, M. and W. Meckling (1976) "Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs Agency Costs The costs resulting from an agent performing services for a principal. Notes: Agency costs are generally the commissions earned by agents. See also: Agency Problem, Agent, Principal Agency costs and ownership structure" Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305-360. Klijn, E.-H. and G. Teisman (2000) "Governing public-private partnerships Public-private partnership (PPP) describes a government service or private business venture which is funded and operated through a partnership of government and one or more private sector companies. These schemes are sometimes referred to as PPP or P3. : Analysing and managing the processes and institutional characteristics of public-private partnerships" in S. Osborne (ed.) Public-Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective, Routledge, London. Klingner, D., J. Nalbandian and B. Romzek (2001) "Politics, administration and markets" American Review of Public Administration, 32:117-144. Leat, D. (1996) "Are voluntary organisations accountable?" in D. Billis and M. Harris (eds.) Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organisation and Management, MacMillian, London. Maharey, S. (2003) "Social capital and social development: Enabling New Zealanders This is a list of well-known people associated with New Zealand. Art A
Majumdar, D. (2004) "The Community Funding Agency and the voluntary sector: Purchase of service contracting in Otago/Southland" Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63:88-98. Martin, J. (1995) "Contracting and accountability" in J. Boston (ed.) The State Under Contract, Bridget Williams Books, Wellington. Mitchell, R., B. Agle and D. Wood (1997) "Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts" Academy of Management Review, 22:853-886. Mulgan, R. (1997) "Contracting out and accountability" Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56:106-117. Office of the Auditor General (2003) Inquiry Into Public Funding Public funding is money given from tax revenue or other governmental sources to an individual, organization, or entity. See also
Ospina, S., W. Diaz and J. O'Sullivan (2002) "Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based nonprofit organisations" Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31:5-31. Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependency Perspective, Harper and Row, New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of . Robson, P., M. Locke and J. Dawson (1997) Consumerism consumerism Movement or policies aimed at regulating the products, services, methods, and standards of manufacturers, sellers, and advertisers in the interests of the buyer. or Democracy? User Involvement in the Control of Voluntary Organisations, The Policy Press, Bristol. Rochester, C. (1995) "Voluntary agencies and accountability" in D. Smith, C. Rochester and R. Hedley (eds.) An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector, Routledge, London. Schick, A. (2003) Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has Come but Whose Implementation Has Not, OECD OECD: see Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. , Paris. State Services Commission (2002) Improving Accountability: Setting the Scene, Occasional Paper 10, State Services Commission, Wellington. Taylor, M. (1996) "The future of user involvement in the voluntary sector: A contribution to the debate" in NCVO NCVO National Council for Voluntary Organisations (UK voluntary and community sector national representative body) (ed.) Meeting the Challenge of Change: Voluntary Action in the 21st Century: Summary of Evidence and Selected Papers for the Report of the Commission on the Future of the Voluntary Sector, NCVO, London. van der Heijden, H. (1987) "The reconciliation of NGO NGO abbr. nongovernmental organization Noun 1. NGO - an organization that is not part of the local or state or federal government nongovernmental organization autonomy, program integrity and operational effectiveness with accountability to donors" World Development, 15:103-112. Yin, R. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, London. Jo Cribb (1) School of Government Victoria University of Wellington (1) The author has recently completed her doctoral thesis and is contactable at jo@cribbwaterman.net (2) This is available to read on www.rnsd.govt.nz/work-areas/ communities-hapu-iwi/community-and-government/statementofintent.html. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion