Printer Friendly

According to CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution In-House Counsel Can Avoid the Plague of Intellectual Property Litigation: Run-Away Costs and Threat to IP Rights.

NEW YORK -- There is an important resolution strategy to intellectual property litigation, which many in-house Counsel are learning to love: alternative dispute resolution (ADR). There are two basic types of ADR: 1. Non-binding processes, the most common of which is mediation - the voluntary, non-binding, confidential experience in which parties to a conflict attempt, with the help of a neutral person, to find enough common ground to arrive at a settlement; and. 2. Binding processes, the most common of which is arbitration - an out-of-court adjudication of a dispute before a neutral or panel of neutrals, very often with special technical expertise in the underlying subject matter of the dispute.

Every year corporations apply for hundreds of thousands of patents, trademarks, and copyrights for inventions, new products, and names, images, and designs used in commerce. Over time a substantial number are challenged by competitors. Results: expensive litigation, protracted and hostile proceedings, and the black threat of losing the I.P. rights to a prized product or service that may have taken years and millions of dollars to develop.

In fact, an increasing number of in-house Counsel are using ADR in international property disputes, and in so doing are searching for the latest information, research, and successful models. It is to the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution, a nonprofit alliance of nearly 500 of the largest global corporations, law firms, scholars, and public institutions that many turn for guidance, real-life examples, and mediator or arbitrators from CPR's Distinguished Panels of Neutrals.

Those who have successfully resolved I.P. disputes through mediation have found that the benefits are enormous: contained costs, time saved, and the threat of losing a patent or trademark greatly diminished.

Reporters and editors interested in covering this timely subject may have immediate access to the following expert resources:

--An interview with or by-lined article by Robert F. Copple, Chair of CPR's Patent Commission, which is currently spearheading a major initiative to study the use of ADR in patent disputes. Mr. Copple was Senior Litigation Counsel for Motorola, where he handled the majority of the company's patent litigation portfolio. He is also a litigator and an expert on intellectual property, as well as being a trained mediator and arbitrator. Recently, he moved to Lewis and Roca in Phoenix where he is continuing his litigation and ADR practice.

--A by-lined article by Michael Leathes, an active member of The CPR Institute, and very involved with CPR's trademark committee. Mr. Leathes is Head of Intellectual Property for British American Tobacco and has been at the forefront of utilizing mediation in trademark disputes.

--Actual case studies from companies that have successfully turned to mediation to resolve I.P. disputes as well as their stunning results.

About the CPR Institute For Dispute Resolution

The CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution is a pioneer and leader in the area of dispute resolution. In February 2004, CPR received the highest ratings in alternative dispute resolution performance in a survey of General Counsels and their Deputies by Corporate Legal Times. Most recently, CPR in partnership with The China Council for Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT) established the U.S.-China Business Mediation Center in New York and Beijing. Founded in 1979 as the Center for Public Resources, CPR promotes excellence and innovation in public and private dispute resolution, and serves as a primary multinational resource for avoidance, management and resolution of business-related and other disputes. CPR's wealth of intellectual property and published material has educated and motivated America toward an increased reliance on negotiation rather than litigation. CPR's proprietary Panel of esteemed arbitrators and mediators has provided resolutions in thousands of cases, with billions of dollars at issue, worldwide.

For more information, please visit our web site at
COPYRIGHT 2004 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jun 29, 2004
Previous Article:QualCore Logic Validated as `Ready for IBM Technology'.
Next Article:Screenvision Realigns National and Corporate Sales to Create Full-Service Sales Team to Further Expand #1 Market Share Position and Deliver the...

Related Articles
Stay out of court.
Keeping Legal Costs Down. (Litigation).
Five tips to steer clear of the courthouse: how CPAs help companies reduce litigation through risk management.
Legal skills for the industry. (Profile of the Week: Starr Associates LLP).
Law firm to open NY office.
Convergence of IP and tax law distinguish TEI's comments on cross licensing arrangements: institute also follows up on cost sharing.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters