AU Commandments protest sparks debate in big sky country.The governor of Montana has vowed to defend Ten Commandments Ten Commandments or Decalogue [Gr.,=ten words], in the Bible, the summary of divine law given by God to Moses on Mt. Sinai. They have a paramount place in the ethical system in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Listed in the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy, the commandments are divided into duties toward God, one's neighbors, and society. Their normative status is indicated by their prescriptive and unconditional language. displays on government property, asserting that those who oppose them "need a little help." Gov. Judy Martz, a Republican, made the comments in late February during a press conference when asked about an ongoing dispute over a Commandments display in Kalispell Kalispell (kăl`ĭspĕl', –pĕl`), city (1990 pop. 11,917), seat of Flathead co., NW Mont., at the head of Flathead Lake near Glacier National Park; inc. 1892. It is the tourist and trade center of a rich agricultural and timber region., reported the Associated Press. "People who are offended by the Ten Commandments have a deeper problem than the stone that it's written on, I think," said Martz. "Anybody that has trouble with the Ten Commandments, I think they have something going inside of them that would need a little help anyway." Responding to complaints from local residents, Americans United's Legal Department wrote to officials in Kalispell Feb. 17 and requested that a Ten Commandments monument in front of the courthouse in Flathead Flathead, indigenous people of North AmericaFlathead: see Salish.Flathead, river, Canada and the United StatesFlathead (flăt`hĕd), river, c. County be removed. In the letter, AU Legal Director Ayesha Ayesha: see Aishah. Khan noted that government sponsorship of religious displays is unconstitutional."The courts have overwhelmingly held that the Ten Commandments cannot be displayed on government property in isolation or when the Ten Commandments are more prominently displayed than other documents," Khan wrote. "Because this monument is displayed by itself, it is clearly unconstitutional." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion