APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS DECISION IN LITTON CASE.Byline: Steven J. Gorman Daily News Staff Writer A Washington federal appeals court has refused to reconsider its July decision reinstating a jury finding that Honeywell Inc. infringed on a patent held by Woodland Hills-based Litton Industries Named after inventor Charles Litton Sr., Litton Industries was a large defense contractor in the United States, bought by the Northrop Grumman Corporation in 2001. Inc., Litton announced. The decision clears the way for the case to return to U.S. District Court in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. this week, to set a date for a new trial that will determine monetary damages Monetary damages, in civil law, refers to compensation given to an injured party by a liable party. Monetary damages may be restitution, a penalty, or both. , Litton officials said. A Los Angeles federal court jury ruled in 1993 that Honeywell had infringed on Litton's patent for a process to make laser gyroscope gyroscope (jī`rəskōp'), symmetrical mass, usually a wheel, mounted so that it can spin about an axis in any direction. When spinning, the gyroscope has special properties. navigation and guidance systems. The jury awarded the Woodland Hills company $1.2 billion. But trial Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer overturned the jury verdict in 1995. She found the patent was unenforceable because Litton obtained it by ``inequitable conduct,'' meaning it was based on mistakes, omissions or misrepresentations. In July, a special panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., reversed Pfaelzer's decision but upheld her grant of a new trial on damages. On Friday, the appeals court denied a petition by Honeywell for a rehearing rehearing n. conducting a hearing again based on the motion of one of the parties to a lawsuit, petition or criminal prosecution, usually by the court or agency which originally heard the matter. by the full court. The legal squabble squab·ble intr.v. squab·bled, squab·bling, squab·bles To engage in a disagreeable argument, usually over a trivial matter; wrangle. See Synonyms at argue. n. A noisy quarrel, usually about a trivial matter. is over a process that Litton developed to coat the mirrors used in ring-laser gyroscopes. Litton sued Honeywell in 1990, claiming that the company appropriated the protected process. In a related case, a different federal court jury in Los Angeles awarded Litton $234 million in damages this year after finding that Honeywell illegally had monopolized the commercial aircraft navigation market for inertial reference systems. Pfaelzer affirmed the jury's verdict in that case, but ordered a new trial to re-establish the amount of damages. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion