ANTI-WAR DOC BATTLES TO STAY INTERESTING.Byline: Bob Strauss Film Critic IT MUST BE an election year. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, there they go again. They being liberal documentarians, who flooded movie screens with Bush-bashing films two years ago. This round's first, ``Why We Fight,'' makes an effort to present a more analytical, historically researched and wider-ranging argument than the '04 editions. Director Eugene Jarecki (``The Trials of Henry Kissinger'') disdains the hysterics and grandstanding of the Michael Moore intr.v. muck·raked, muck·rak·ing, muck·rakes To search for and expose misconduct in public life. [From the man with the muckrake, can be pretty entertaining, and at its best Jarecki's approach is educational. Which, as noted, is not a bad thing. Jarecki's provocative and sometimes well-argued premise is that, since World War II, America has been on a war-driven imperial trajectory that all presidents and political parties have more or less enabled. The most credible dissenter, of course, was Dwight Eisenhower, who in his 1961 farewell speech A Farewell speech is a speech given by an individual leaving a position or place. They are often used by public figures such as politicians as a form of conclusion to the preceding career (such as that given by Ronald Reagan); or as statements delivered by persons relating to famously warned of the military-industrial complex's growing influence. Jarecki conveniently avoids mentioning the Eisenhower administration's early responsibility for the Vietnam quagmire, although he does quickly note that it had something to do with that blow-back of blow-backs wrong move, installing the shah's regime in Iran. But you get your wisdom where you can find it. Jarecki interviews a variety of pundits from both ends of the political spectrum, both disgruntled dis·grun·tle tr.v. dis·grun·tled, dis·grun·tling, dis·grun·tles To make discontented. [dis- + gruntle, to grumble (from Middle English gruntelen; see and gung ho gung ho or gung-ho adj. Slang Extremely enthusiastic and dedicated. [Earlier Gung Ho, motto of certain U.S. military types, various civilians and even a couple of Iraqi citizens about the title question (``Why We Fight,'' by the way, was the name of the propaganda series Frank Capra oversaw during World War II, back when the reasons weren't so morally murky). It is generally concluded that the old M.I.C. - along with conservative think-tank weasels, even more corrupt private-public sector job jumpers and that elephant-in-the-room no one dares justify, petropolitics - are the main culprits for our seemingly endless war footing. All of this is intelligently presented and makes good sense. However, ``Why We Fight's'' early efforts at bipartisan criticism gradually give way to the usual shots at all things Bush-ite that these movies like to revel in. Deserved as this may be, it quickly gets tedious to watch. Bob Strauss, (818) 713-3670 bob.strauss(at)dailynews.com WHY WE FIGHT - Three stars (PG-13: violence, language) Director: Eugene Jarecki. Running time: 1 hr. 39 min. Playing: Town Center 5, Encino; Playhouse 7, Pasadena; Sunset 5, West Hollywood West Hollywood A community of southern California northeast of Beverly Hills. It is mainly residential. Population: 36,600. ; Monicas, Santa Monica Santa Monica (săn`tə mŏn`ĭkə), city (1990 pop. 86,905), Los Angeles co., S Calif., on Santa Monica Bay; inc. 1886. Tourism and retailing are important, and the city has motion-picture, biotechnology, and software industries. ; South Coast Village 3, Costa Mesa Costa Mesa (kŏs`tə mā`sə), city (1990 pop. 96,357), Orange co., S Calif., on the Pacific south of Santa Ana; inc. 1953. It is a transportation, residential, and light industrial center. . In a nutshell: Fairly well researched anti-war documentary tries to give an overview of post-World War II America's transformation into a military-industrial state. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion