AMT credits allocated in a consolidated group.The IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. has issued proposed regulations that provide rules for determining a consolidated group's alternative minimum tax (AMT See vPro. ) liability (its consolidated AMT) and for allocating various consolidated AMT attributes to members of the group. As is the case for a single corporation, the consolidated group computes the regular tax liability and compares this to the AMT liability, paying the higher of the two. One might think that the group's consolidated AMT is merely a summation summation n. the final argument of an attorney at the close of a trial in which he/she attempts to convince the judge and/or jury of the virtues of the client's case. (See: closing argument) of each member's AMT on a separate-company basis; however, this is not necessarily the result. The charts on pages 472-473 present a calculation for corporations A, B and C. The corporate exemption of $40,000 is ignored and the regular tax rate (RT) is assumed to be 34% in all illustrations. Separate-company basis On a separate-company basis, in chart 1, A owes a total of $600 in tax. This includes $408 in regular tax and $192 in AMT. B has both a net operating loss operating loss The excess of operating expenses over revenue. As with operating income, operating losses exclude revenues and expenses from operations that are not considered a regular part of the business. Also called deficit. Compare operating income. for RT and AMT purposes. Therefore, B does not have any tax liability for the year. Since C's tentative tentative, adj not final or definite, such as an experimental or clinical finding that has not been validated. minimum tax (TMT TMT 1 Tarsometatarsal 2 Thermomechanical treatment 3 Treatment, see there ) is less than its RT, C does not have any AMT. Consolidated basis What would happen if A, B and C were all members of an affiliated group that files a consolidated return? if the consolidated AMT for the group were computed as the total of the separate-company AMTs, the liability would total $192. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.1502-55, this is not the proper computation Computation is a general term for any type of information processing that can be represented mathematically. This includes phenomena ranging from simple calculations to human thinking. . Instead, the consolidated AMT is determined based on consolidated alternative minimum taxable income Under the federal tax law, gross income reduced by adjustments and allowable deductions. It is the income against which tax rates are applied to compute an individual or entity's tax liability. The essence of taxable income is the accrual of some gain, profit, or benefit to a taxpayer. (AMTI AMTI Applied Marine Technology Inc AMTI Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc (Watertown, MA) AMTI Applied Marine Technology, Inc. AMTI Advanced Medical Technology Institute AMTI Automatic Moving Target Indicator ) (Prop. Regs. See. 1.1502-55(a)(2)1. Each member must compute To perform mathematical operations or general computer processing. For an explanation of "The 3 C's," or how the computer processes data, see computer. its separate AMTI (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.1502-55(b)(2)(ii)). The total of each member's separate AMTIs is the consolidated AMTI. The AMT is then computed based on the consolidated AMTI (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1502-55(a)(2)). With A, B and C, see chart 2 for the AMT calculation. On a separate-company basis, the three corporations have a total AMT liability of $192. Yet, when the companies are combined, the total AMT liability is $220. The increase in the AMT liability is due to A's and C's large amount of AMT adjustments and preferences. On a stand-alone (jargon) stand-alone - Capable of operating without other programs, libraries, computers, hardware, networks, etc. Exactly what is absent is presumed to be obvious from context. "We only run Windows on stand-alone PCs because it's too dangerous to run it on networked ones." basis, C has enough regular taxable income to avoid the AMT. However, when it is combined with the other members of the group, the total taxable income is not large enough to outweigh out·weigh tr.v. out·weighed, out·weigh·ing, out·weighs 1. To weigh more than. 2. To be more significant than; exceed in value or importance: The benefits outweigh the risks. the AMT adjustments and preferences. Therefore, a greater consolidated AMT results. The extent to which a company's AMT exceeds the regular tax generates a minimum tax credit (MTC mtc - A Modula-2 to C translator. ftp://rusmv1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/soft/Unixtools/compilerbau/mtc.tar.Z. ) that may be carried forward and used to offset regular tax in the future (See. 53). On a separate-company basis, A has a total tax liability of $600. The MTC is equal to the amount of AMT included in this figure. Thus, the MTC is $192, which may only be carried forward to a subsequent year. B and C do not have an MTC (as they did not pay any AMT). Looking at the example of A, B and C, what happens to the calculation of the MTC in a consolidated group? On a separate-company basis, the sum of the group's total MTC is $192. However, the consolidated AMT calculated based on proposed regulations is $220; this is the MTC for the consolidated group (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.1502-55(h)(3, The next question is how the consolidated MTC is allocated to individual members of the group. The allocation The apportionment or designation of an item for a specific purpose or to a particular place. In the law of trusts, the allocation of cash dividends earned by a stock that makes up the principal of a trust for a beneficiary usually means that the dividends will be treated as of the credit becomes very important if a member departs from the group (a common event in corporate America America [for Amerigo Vespucci], the lands of the Western Hemisphere—North America, Central (or Middle) America, and South America. The world map published in 1507 by Martin Waldseemüller is the first known cartographic use of the name. ). The MTC allocated to the departing de·part v. de·part·ed, de·part·ing, de·parts v.intr. 1. To go away; leave. 2. To die. 3. member can be an asset to the acquiring shareholders, as it represents a potential dollar-for-dollar reduction in future regular taxes. In simplest terms, the computation of the member's contribution involves determining the TMT without the member's income and adjustments and comparing this to the total group TMT that includes the member's income and adjustments (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1.1502-55(h)(6)). This calculation is presented for A, B, and C in charts 3 through 5. In chart 3, consolidated AMT computed without A's items is $28. Therefore, the difference of $192 represents A's contribution to the group's TMT. This is referred to in the proposed regulations as A's separate adjusted AMT/MTC. It should also be noted that this equals the amount of A's AMT/MTC computed on a separate-company basis. In chart 4, consolidated AMT computed without B's items is $172. Therefore, the $48 difference represents B's contribution to the group's TMT or separate adjusted AMT/MTC. It is surprising that B contributes anything at all to the group's TMT. On a separate-company basis, B has a zero regular tax liability and a zero AMT liability. Additionally, B's AMT adjustments and preferences total only $100. Yet, under the proposed regulations, almost half of that amount becomes B's allocated MTC. In chart 5, consolidated AMT computed without C's items is $240. This exceeds the consolidated AMT of $220. Based on the proposed regulations, because the consolidated AMT without C's items is more than the amount computed with C's items, C has no separate adjusted AMT. Therefore, even though C has $2,000 in AMT adjustments and preferences, it has no separate AMT. This is consistent with the calculation of AMT computed on a separate basis in the previous section. The actual allocation of the MTC to the members of the group is computed by multiplying mul·ti·ply 1 v. mul·ti·plied, mul·ti·ply·ing, mul·ti·plies v.tr. 1. To increase the amount, number, or degree of. 2. Mathematics To perform multiplication on. the consolidated AMT for the year by a fraction (Prop. Regs. Sec. 1. 1502-55 (h)(6)(iii)(a)). The numerator numerator the upper part of a fraction. numerator relationship see additive genetic relationship. numerator Epidemiology The upper part of a fraction of the fraction is the separate adjusted AMT of the member for the year, and the denominator denominator the bottom line of a fraction; the base population on which population rates such as birth and death rates are calculated. denominator of the fraction is the sum of the separate adjusted AMTs of each member for the year. Based on these calculations the sum of the separate adjusted AMTs is $240. The actual allocation using the three companies is computed in chart 6. Following the proposed regulations, A and B are allocated a portion of the AMT credit, while C is allocated none of it. The equity of these results is questionable. The amount allocated to A of $176 seems reasonable. When A's AMT liability was computed on a stand-alone basis, it had an AMT liability of $192. The allocation appears to be justifiable jus·ti·fi·a·ble adj. Having sufficient grounds for justification; possible to justify: justifiable resentment. jus on the grounds that even if A were not a part of the consolidated group, a legitimate AMT liability would have been incurred and an MTC created. The allocation of a portion of the credit to B is difficult to understand. On a stand-alone basis, B does not generate a AMT or regular tax liability. In addition, B's AMT adjustment and preference items totaled only $100. To allocate To reserve a resource such as memory or disk. See memory allocation. $44 of the credit to B results in a 44% return rate on adjustment and preference items that resulted in no tax liability. Alternatively, A is receiving only a 9.8% tax credit rate on similar items which did cause additional liability. C is the loser (jargon) loser - An unexpectedly bad situation, program, programmer, or person. Someone who habitually loses. (Even winners can lose occasionally). Someone who knows not and knows not that he knows not. . While, unlike A and B, its regular tax liability is greater than the AMT liability on a stand-alone basis, C had the largest amount of AMT adjustment and preference items. Yet, C is not allocated any of the credit. The AMT was enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Proposed regulations on the MTC did not appear until 1992, six years later. Hopefully, extensive review and consideration of the proposed regulations will take place before they are finalized See finalization. .
AMT Credits: Separate-Company Basis
Chart 1:
A B C
Taxable
income $1,200 $(200) $3,000
Add:
AMT adjustments
and preferences 1,800 100 2,000
Alternative
minimum taxable
income (AMTI) $3,000 (100) $5,000
Comparison between tentative minimum
tax (TMT) and regular tax (RT):
TMT
(AMTI x 20%) $ 600 $ 0(*) 1,000
RT
(taxable income
x 34%) 408 0(*) 1,020
AMT
(TMT - RT) $ 192 $ 0 0(**)
(*) The TMT and RT may not be reduced below zero.
(**) The AMT may not be reduced below zero.
AMT Credits: Consolidated Basis
Chart 2:
A B C Cons.
Taxable
income $1,200 $ (200) $3,000 $4,000
Add:
AMT adjustments
and preferences 1,800 100 2,000 3,900
Consolidated AMTI $3,000 $ (100) $5,000 $7,900
Comparison between TMT and RT:
TMT (consolidated AMTI x 20%) $1,580
RT (consolidated taxable income x 34%) 1,360
Consolidated AMT (TMT - RT) $ 220
Chart 3:
Cons.
A Cons. co. A w/o A
Taxable income $4,000 $1,200 $2,800
Add:
AMT adjustments
and preferences 3,900 1,800 2,100
Consolidated AMTI $7,900 $3,000 $4,900
Comparison between TMT and RT:
TMT (AMTI x 20%) $1,580 $ 980
RT (taxable income
x 34%) 1,360 952
MTC $ 220 $ 28 $192
Difference
Chart 4:
Cons.
B Cons co. B w/o B
Taxable income $4,000 $(200) 4,200
Add:
AMT adjustments
and preferences 3,900 100 3,800
Consolidated AMTI $7,900 $(100) $8,000
Comparison between TMT and RT:
TMT (AMTI x 20%) $1,580 $1,600
RT (taxable income
x 34%) 1,360 1,428
MTC $ 220 $ 172 $48
Difference
Chart 5:
Cons,
C Cons co. C w/o C
Taxable income $4,000 $3,000 $1,000
Add:
AMT adjustments
and preferences 3,900 2,000 1,900
Consolidated AMTI $7,900 $5,000 $2,900
Comparison between TMT and RT:
TMT (AMTI x 20%) $1,580 $ 580
RT (taxable income
x 34%) 1,360 340
MTC $ 220 $ 240 $(20)
Difference
Chart 6:
Allocated
Cons. AMT Fraction amount
A $220 x 192/240 = 176
B 220 x 48/240 = 44
c 220 x 0/240 = 0
Total allocated $220
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion