AMD and Intel Largely in Harmony on x86-64 Reports In-Stat/MDR's Microprocessor Report.

Business Editors/High-Tech Writers

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 5, 2004

An independent analysis by In-Stat/MDR's (http://www.mdronline.com) Microprocessor Report indicates that the 64-bit x86 architectures from AMD and Intel are almost, but not quite, identical. Near-100 percent software compatibility is possible, but in some cases, programs written for one 64-bit architecture may not run properly on the other 64-bit architecture.

Microprocessor Report compared all the new instructions, modified instructions, deleted instructions, and modifications to the register files -- including control registers, system registers, and registers visible to application programs. Memory-addressing schemes and many other architectural features, such as data-addressing modes, context-switching behavior, interrupt handling, and support for existing 16- and 32-bit x86 execution modes were also compared. In every case, Intel had patterned its 64-bit x86 architecture after AMD64 in almost every detail.

However, Microprocessor Report discovered a few differences that even AMD and Intel were unaware of. Some of these differences may be resolved in future 64-bit x86 processors, or even in future steppings of x86 processors already announced or on the market. In other cases, software can easily adapt to the differences by executing slightly different code, after first probing the CPU to learn which 64-bit extensions it supports.

"We found nothing to contradict Intel's promise that its 64-bit x86 processors will run the 64-bit operating systems developed for AMD64," said Tom R. Halfhill, a senior editor with In-Stat/MDR's Microprocessor Report. "At the same time, Intel's reluctance to make a blanket guarantee about mutual 64-bit software compatibility is justified by the minor differences we discovered. Of course, that's always the case when Intel or AMD introduces new x86 extensions -- such as Intel's SSE3 media extensions, which aren't yet supported by AMD."

Despite the differences, Intel clearly derived its 64-bit architecture by reading AMD's prerelease documentation for AMD64 and by testing AMD64 processors. "Intel's reverse-engineering of AMD64 marks a major turning point in the historical relationship between the companies," said Halfhill. "Although AMD has in the past introduced some innovations to the x86 architecture -- the 3DNow multimedia extensions being a prime example -- this is the first time AMD has truly steered the direction of the world's most important microprocessor architecture, which Intel invented in 1978 and has closely guarded for 26 years."

The article, "AMD and Intel Harmonize on 64" can be found in the March 29 edition of In-Stat/MDR's Microprocessor Report, a subscription newsletter for makers and users of high-performance microprocessors. To find out more about Microprocessor Report, please visit: www.mdronline.com.

In-Stat/MDR (http://www.mdronline.com) offers a broad range of information resources and analytical assets to technology vendors, service providers, technology professionals, and market specialists worldwide. The company stands alone in its ability to integrate both supply-side and demand-side research methodologies into a single comprehensive view of technology markets and products. This capability relies on a unique ability to cover the entire value chain from engineering-level technology, through equipment, infrastructure, services and end users.

In-Stat/MDR is part of the Reed Electronics Group, a division of Reed Elsevier (www.reedelsevier.com), a world-leading publisher and information provider. With over 38,000 employees worldwide, Reed Elsevier operates in the science & medical, legal, education and business-to-business industry sectors, providing high value and flexible information solutions to professional end users, with increasing emphasis on the Internet.