AIDS nomad: author Susan Hunter has studied AIDS in 29 countries. She says the epidemic in the United States is not all that different from that in the developing world.Author and AIDS expert Susan Hunter spends much of her time in the developing world studying the AIDS epidemic. Her many works on the subject--which are as comprehensive as their titles are straightforward--include AIDS in Asia: A Continent in Peril; Black Death: AIDS in Africa; and AIDS in America, which was published this year. At press time Hunter spoke to The Advocate via e-mail from Ethiopia, where she has been working on AIDS prevention and treatment. What have you learned about AIDS from studying it on a global scale? I've confirmed my belief that most, if not all, human epidemics are 5% pathogens and 95% social factors, economics, and politics. In other words Adv. 1. in other words - otherwise stated; "in other words, we are broke" put differently , humans decide through their political and social systems how epidemics are distributed in countries--that is, who gets sick--and who has access to treatment, care, and support. Marginalized groups--be they the poor, people of color Noun 1. people of color - a race with skin pigmentation different from the white race (especially Blacks) people of colour, colour, color race - people who are believed to belong to the same genetic stock; "some biologists doubt that there are important , people with alternative sexual identities, or drug users--are the most impacted by HIV/AIDS HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome . The powerful want to stay in power and sacrifice the interests and lives of the less powerful to do so. Why have you focused so much attention on other parts of the world? I've worked on AIDS in the U.S., but my background as a medical anthropologist drew me to my work in developing countries, where AIDS epidemics are generally worse. I've worked on the epidemic in 29 different countries for most of my career, but after writing books on Africa and Asia, I realized that most of the same factors driving the epidemic are found in the U.S.--and are perhaps worse. That's why I decided to write AIDS in America, to confront these issues at home and in my own mind and heart. It was a truly difficult book to write because I was talking to Noun 1. talking to - a lengthy rebuke; "a good lecture was my father's idea of discipline"; "the teacher gave him a talking to" lecture, speech rebuke, reprehension, reprimand, reproof, reproval - an act or expression of criticism and censure; "he had to people in my own country who suffered the same problems as poor Africans and Asians. What are we failing to recognize about the epidemic in the U.S.? The media and even public-health experts have been lulled into complacency about the U.S. epidemic because they assume a rich country will never have a large-scale epidemic. But we now have the largest epidemic of any developed country, and it's about time It's About Time may refer to:
tr.v. mis·per·ceived, mis·per·ceiv·ing, mis·per·ceives To perceive incorrectly; misunderstand. mis that somehow we are invulnerable in·vul·ner·a·ble adj. 1. Immune to attack; impregnable. 2. Impossible to damage, injure, or wound. [French invulnérable, from Old French, from Latin , but it's catching up to us now. It's time It's Time was a successful political campaign run by the Australian Labor Party (ALP) under Gough Whitlam at the 1972 election in Australia. Campaigning on the perceived need for change after 23 years of conservative (Liberal Party of Australia) government, Labor put forward a for hard stories about our own epidemic and the inequities that drive it. What's the most threatening issue we face now? Probably issues arising from our failure to address social injustice Social Injustice is a concept relating to the perceived unfairness or injustice of a society in its divisions of rewards and burdens. The concept is distinct from those of justice in law, which may or may not be considered moral in practice. in the past. We have to confront the damage we've caused by failing to demand that those who have resources respond to the needs of those who don't. We've put the foxes in charge of the henhouse, and lots of feathers and fur must fly before we get back on track. So what should Americans do? Most Americans are very caring, and they have to return to the sense of community and social responsibility that's been a hallmark of our culture in the past. We've become a very harsh state, the land of the unhelping hand. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion