Printer Friendly

AIDS blood test: qualified success.

The AIDS blood-screening test got its first-semester grades at a meeting of AIDS researchers and industry representatives last week in Bethesda, Md. The consensus: The test earns an A for cleaning up the blood supply. But it gets lower marks for its specificity, because it falsely identifies some people as "positive" for antibodies to the virus. The meeting was sponsored by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

Meeting participants compared notes on data collected since the first AIDS blood screen was approved on March 2, nine months after the virus was made available to manufacturers (SN:3/9/85, p. 148). While there were minor discrepancies within the overwhelming amount of data presented, the test testers say the blood screen is nearly 100 percent accurate in identifying all blood samples that contain antibodies to the virus associated with AIDS.

As of Aug. 5, according to the CDC, 207 transfusion recipients and 83 hemophiliacs have gotten AIDS from blood or blood products. But while removing AIDS-tainted blood will stop new blood-related transmission, the incidence of blood-associated AIDS is expected to tail off slowly, since AIDS can appear more than five years after receipt of contaminated blood(SN:5/25/85, p. 328).

In general, conference participants were optimistic about the test and pessimistic about the syndrome. "the infection has a big jump on us," says James W. Curran, head of CDC's AIDS task force. Only 2 percent of the 12,107 documented adult AIDS cases (about half of whom have died so far) were the result or receiving blood or blood products. "I think we have solved the problem of transfusion; we have much to do with the other 98 percent of cases," says Curran.

Three representatives of test manufacturers reported at the meeting that the test's sensitivity rate -- its ability to identify people with the viral antibodies -- is in the 99 percent-plus range. But the test falters in the area of specificity. Of more than 1 million blood unit reports tabulated by the FDA, 0.85 percent were initially positive but only 0.25 percent were positive on repeat testing. And in an American Red Cross/CDC analysis of 2,552 repeatedly reactive specimens, only 23 percent of those were positive by a more exact but more difficult confirmatory test.

In the current test, called ELISA for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, blood serum is placed in wells containing pieces of the AIDS virus. If antibodies to the virus are present in the blood, they will stick to viral fragments and can be detected by an added chemical that causes a color change. The confirmatory "Western blot" test is more exact -- it detects not only antibody presence but also antibody size. Proteins from the virus are spread on a special paper. Blood serum is added, and if antibodies are present they can be detected and sized; only those that are the same size as known antibodies to AIDS are accepted as a positive result.

The ELISA, many of the researchers pointed out at the meeting, was designed as a quick, inexpensive and accurate way to safeguard the blood supply, not as a screen for people with AIDS. The specificity weakness is relatively minor as long as the test is used for its intended purpose, they note.

The high false positive rate means some antibody-free blood will be discarded, but not to the point where it will critically affect blood bank supplies, say the researchers. But it does present the dilemma of what to tell a person with positive results, since not all positive ELISA tests represent antibodies to the AIDS virus, and since the prognosis for people with antibodies -- even if confirmed by Western blot -- remains to be determined.

The false positive rate is disproportionately high in women, who represent only about 7 percent of AIDS cases but nearly half the repeatedly positive ELISA tests. One possible reason discussed at the meeting was initially suggested in the May 25 LANCET by University of frankfurt researchers. At the time of delivery, some mothers develop antibodies against proteins on the surface of forein (i.e., the baby's) white blood cells. In the ELISA test, these antibodies could, in turn, recognize and react with protein that the AIDS virus has picked up from the host white blood cell in which it was grown. The result would be a positive test, though no antibodies specific to the AIDS virus would be present.

Several companies are working on a second-generation test that uses recombinant-DNA-produced proteins instead of viral fragments as an antibody target in the ELISA assay. A researcher from one such company, Centocor in Malvern, Pa., noted that the recombinant DNA system promises a constant and plentiful supply of virus-related protein without the hazards of working with the virus. In addition, using recombinant DNA eliminates false positives that arise from cross reactions with extraneous cell debris included in the virus portion. Farther down the line are viral testing kits.

In summing up the performance of a test that entered the market incredibly quickly -- only nine months after manufacturers had the virus to work with -- Joseph Bove of the Arlington, Va.-based American Association of Blood Banks says, "We have a lot to learn, but if in any way the past is prologue, I'm encouraged that we will learn it quickly."
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Silberner, Joanne
Publication:Science News
Date:Aug 10, 1985
Words:897
Previous Article:Living on borrowed legs.
Next Article:Supernova encounter of a third kind.
Topics:


Related Articles
The great AIDS race: testing the test.
On the AIDS trail: work continues on test, cure, vaccine.
AIDS blood screen approved.
AIDS blood screens: chapters 2 and 3.
Notes from the expanding AIDS front.
Blood donation under the AIDS regime.
Improving the AIDS test: genetic engineers offer a new approach to AIDS-antibody testing.
Mail-order AIDS tests: FDA confronts the implications.
Renewed flap over AIDS test patent.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters