AICPA comments on FAB 2006-03.The AICPA AICPA See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). has submitted comments to the Department of Labor (DOL DOL - Display Oriented Language. Subsystem of DOCUS. Sammet 1969, p.678. ) regarding Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) 2006-03. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA PPA 1. Palpation, Percussion & Ausculation 2. Pittsburgh pneumonia agent 3. Postpartum amenorrhea 4. Price per accession 5. Pure pulmonary atresia '06) Section 508(a) revised ERISA's periodic pension benefit statement requirements. Under prior law, ERISA See Employee Retirement Income Security Act. ERISA See Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Sections 105(a) and 502(c)(1) required a qualified retirement plan administrator to furnish fur·nish tr.v. fur·nished, fur·nish·ing, fur·nish·es 1. To equip with what is needed, especially to provide furniture for. 2. a benefit statement to any participant or beneficiary who requests such statement in writing. The benefit statement must indicate, on the basis of the latest available information, the participant's or beneficiary's total accrued benefit and the participant's or beneficiary's vested accrued benefit, or indicate the earliest date on which the accrued benefit will become vested. A participant or beneficiary is not to receive more than one benefit statement during any 12-month period. If the required statement is not timely provided, the participant or the beneficiary may bring a civil action to recover from the administrator $100 a day or other relief that a court deems appropriate. Section 508(a) changes the benefit statement requirements to make them dependent--in part--on the plan type and the individual to whom the statement is provided. Section 508(a) requires that the benefit statement (1) be based on the latest available information; (2) include the total benefits accrued or the vested accrued benefit, or indicate the earliest date on which the accrued benefit will become vested; and (3) include an explanation of any permitted disparity dis·par·i·ty n. pl. dis·par·i·ties 1. The condition or fact of being unequal, as in age, rank, or degree; difference: "narrow the economic disparities among regions and industries" or floor-offset arrangement that may be applied in determining accrued benefits Accrued benefits The pension benefits earned by an employee according to the years of the employee's service. under the plan. With respect to vested benefits vested benefits Pension benefits that belong to an employee independent of his or her future employment. An employee usually becomes vested after five years of employment with the same firm, although there are numerous exceptions requiring longer employment. , the Secretary of Labor is required to provide that the requirements are met if, at least annually, the plan updates the information on vested benefits in the benefit statement or provides in a separate statement the information necessary to enable participants and beneficiaries to determine their vested benefits. On December 20, 2006, the DOL issued FAB 2006-03 to provide guidance concerning "good faith compliance" with these new rules pending the issuance of regulations. In FAB 2006-03, the DOL states that furnishing pension benefit statement information not later than 45 days following the end of the period (calendar quarter or calendar year) will constitute good-faith compliance with the requirement to furnish a pension benefit statement in accordance with ERISA Sections 105(a)(1)(A)(i) and (ii). The Section 508(a)requirements are different for defied-contribution plans and defined-benefit plans Defined-Benefit Plan An employer-sponsored retirement plan for which retirement benefits are based on a formula indicating the exact benefit that one can expect upon retiring. Investment risk and portfolio management are entirely under the control of the company. . The AICPA's comments were limited to the reporting requirements for defined-contribution plans Defined-Contribution Plan A retirement plan wherein a certain amount or percentage of money is set aside each year for the benefit of the employee. There are restrictions as to when and how you can withdraw these funds without penalties. . In its comments, the AICPA strongly recommended the removal of the 45-day requirement, given the time constraints In law, time constraints are placed on certain actions and filings in the interest of speedy justice, and additionally to prevent the evasion of the ends of justice by waiting until a matter is moot. and procedures required for administrators and plan sponsors to properly gather the data necessary to prepare participant statements for plans that do not receive the plan sponsor's contribution until the tax return's extended due date. In its place, the AICPA recommended that the extended due date of the Form 5500 be used as the benchmark in any future guidance issued by the DOE for participant reporting for plans utilizing accrued contributions and the accrual accrual, n continually recurring short-term liabilities. Examples are accrued wages, taxes, and interest. or modified accrual method of financial statement accounting. For cash-basis participant-directed accounts, the AICPA recommended that participant statements be provided quarterly. It also suggested that the quarterly statement be deemed to satisfy the statutory requirement as long as it is accompanied by a statement that explains the restrictions and limitations on investments, the importance of diversification, how to contact the Social Security Administration, and the DOL's website. The AICPA also urged the DOL to treat participants in the pooled portion of a hybrid plan in the same manner as plans that offer only trustee-directed investments--one annual statement or periodic statements. The AICPA further recommended that the date for providing participant statements be the extended due date of the Form 5500. The AICPA requested that the DOL allow plan sponsors at least a one-year period after the model statements have been published to implement these changes in their reporting systems. Further, it encouraged the DOL to allow a longer grace period for the 2007 plan year without penalty for plan sponsors who made a good-faith attempt to disclose but delivered participant disclosures or statements late during the 2007 plan year. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion