ADVISORY/Pacific Legal Foundation To Argue Major Proposition 209 Case in Third District Court of Appeal on Friday, August 24.News Desks/Legal Writers ADVISORY for...Aug. 24 (Fri.) --(BUSINESS WIRE) Media Availability with Ward Connerly Wardell Connerly (born June 15, 1939) is a political activist, businessman, and former University of California Regent. He is also the founder and the chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute, a national non-profit organization in opposition to racial and gender preferences. and PLF Noun 1. PLF - a terrorist group formed in 1977 as the result of a split with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine; became a satellite of al-Fatah; made terrorist attacks on Israel across the Lebanese border Attorney Anthony Caso Changed from Noon to After Oral Argument Who: The Sacramento-based Pacific Legal Foundation representing Ward Connerly in a challenge to state government's alleged violations of California's Proposition 209: Connerly v. State Personnel Board. What: Media availability following oral argument. Ward Connerly and PLF's Anthony Caso will provide comments and perspective on the case and its implications as California nears the fifth anniversary of Prop. 209's passage. The case involves a long-running legal challenge to alleged violations of Proposition 209 contained in four state statutes that violate 209's mandate for race neutrality. Where: Steps of the Library and Courts Building (the Third District Court of Appeal) 914 Capitol Capitol, seat of the U.S. Congress Capitol, seat of the U.S. government at Washington, D.C. It is the city's dominating monument, built on an elevated site that was chosen by George Washington in consultation with Major Pierre L'Enfant. Mall (across from the fountain). When: At the conclusion of oral argument in Connerly v. State Personnel Board that begins at or after 2:00 p.m. (depending on the order in which the court hears the three cases on its afternoon calendar). In the Connerly case, PLF represents Ward Connerly in a lawsuit lawsuit: see procedure; tort. challenging four state statutes that PLF says clearly flout flout v. flout·ed, flout·ing, flouts v.tr. To show contempt for; scorn: flout a law; behavior that flouted convention. See Usage Note at flaunt. v.intr. California's Proposition 209. They include race preference mandates for community college hiring; general race preference mandates in state hiring policies; race preferences in contracting for the Lottery lottery, scheme for distributing prizes by lot or other method of chance selection to persons who have paid for the opportunity to win. The term is not applicable when lots are drawn without payment by the interested parties to determine some matter, e.g. and the state treasurer's bond-related contracts. Last year, PLF won a major victory before the California Supreme Court in a PLF enforcement action against the City of San Jose San Jose, city, United States San Jose (sănəzā`, săn hōzā`), city (1990 pop. 782,248), seat of Santa Clara co., W central Calif.; founded 1777, inc. 1850. . In that case, PLF challenged San Jose's race-based preference programs as violating Proposition 209, which were defended by, among others, California's Attorney General. |
|
||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion