Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,546,674 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

ACLJ: Judiciary Committee Vote for John Roberts Shows Conservative Judicial Philosophy Represents ''Mainstream'' America; Stage Set for President's Next Nominee to Supreme Court.


WASHINGTON -- The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), specializing in constitutional law, today applauded the Senate Judiciary Committee for voting to recommend confirmation to the full Senate for John Roberts as Chief Justice chief justice n. the presiding judge of any State Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the U. S. Supreme Court is appointed by the President and then confirmed (or not) by the U. S. Senate. The Chief Justice sets the tone for the Court, assigns the writing of majority opinions to fellow justices or to himself/herself, and oversees the management of the court and its staff. Since U. S. and says the vote clearly shows that a conservative judicial philosophy represents "mainstream" America.

"The vote by the Judiciary Committee reflects the fact that John Roberts is an exceptional nominee with a conservative judicial philosophy - a philosophy that represents mainstream America," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ, who supports the nomination. "It's encouraging that several Democrats recognized his talents and capabilities by voting for his confirmation. At the same time, though, it's unfortunate that others chose to politicize a confirmation process by trying to turn it into some sort of election. It's now up to the full Senate to move swiftly to confirm John Roberts so he can assume his duties and responsibilities as Chief Justice when the Supreme Court begins its new term in a matter of weeks. We call on the Senate to confirm John Roberts without delay.

"The focus will soon shift to President Bush's next appointee to the high court. We have no doubt that President Bush will select a nominee who embraces his judicial philosophy of interpreting the Constitution - not legislating from the bench. The political dynamics suggest that the confirmation process for the next nominee will be much more contentious. We hope that isn't the case, but are certainly prepared to move quickly and aggressively to ensure that the next nominee gets a fair hearing and a prompt vote in the Senate."

The American Center for Law and Justice is based in Washington, D.C. and is online at www.aclj.org.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Sep 22, 2005
Words:284
Previous Article:Chicago Police Department Launches TranTech's Innovative Video Interrogation System - CLEARView(TM).
Next Article:Corgenix Reports Record Sales for Fiscal 2005; Performance of Core Diagnostic Business Combined with Lucrative Strategic Partnerships Provide Boost...



Related Articles
Trading up.(THE LAW)(chief justice selection)
Ask not: our crazy rules for judicial nominees.(senators views on John Roberts' selection)
Ted Kennedy eyes the court.(John Roberts' selection to Supreme Court)
Confirm Roberts.(Editorials)(Nominee deserves bipartisan support)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL CONFIRMATION TIME.(Editorial)(Editorial)
Winning confirmation.(Editorials)(President Bush should heed Wyden's words)(Editorial)
White House hypocrisy.(Editorials)(Bush pushes Miers' faith as a qualification)(Editorial)
Umpires.(John G. Roberts Jr. appointment)(Editorial)
Hearing lessons: a how-to guide for judicial confirmations.(THE SUPREME COURT)
Changes in the Supreme Court.(NATIONAL)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles