A tale of two cities: effects of air pollution on hospital admissions in Hong Kong and London compared. (Articles).

The causal interpretation of reported associations between daily air pollution and daily admissions requires consideration of residual confounding, correlation between pollutants, and effect modification. If results obtained in Hong Kong and London--which differ in climate, lifestyle, and many other respects--were similar, a causal association would be supported. We used identical statistical methods for the analysis in each city. Associations between daily admissions and pollutant levels were estimated using Poisson regression. Nonparametric smoothing methods were used to model seasonality and the nonlinear dependence of admissions on temperature, humidity, and influenza admissions. For respiratory admissions ([greater than equal to] 65 years of age), significant positive associations were observed with particulate matter < 10 [micro]m in aerodynamic diameter (P[M.sub.10]), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone in both cities. These associations tended to be stronger at shorter lags in Hong Kong and at longer lags in London. Associations were stronger in the cool season in Hong Kong and in the warm season in London, periods during which levels of humidity are at their lowest in each city. For cardiac admissions (all ages) in both cities, significant positive associations were observed for P[M.sub.10], N[O.sub.2], and S[O.sub.2] with similar lag patterns. Associations tended to be stronger in the cool season. The associations with N[O.sub.2] and S[O.sub.2] were the most robust in two-pollutant models. Patterns of association for pollutants with ischemic heart disease were similar in the two cities. The associations between [O.sub.3] and cardiac admissions were negative in London but positive in Hong Kong. We conclude that air pollution has remarkably similar associations with daily cardiorespiratory admissions in both cities, in spite of considerable differences between cities in social, lifestyle, and environmental factors. The results strengthen the argument that air pollution causes detrimental short-term health effects. Key words: air pollution, cardiac and respiratory hospital admissions, daily time-series, Hong Kong, London. Environ Health Perspect 110:67-77 (2002). [Online 18 December 2001]

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2002/110p67-77wong/abstract.html

**********

There is now considerable evidence that daily hospital admissions for cardiorespiratory diseases are linked to levels of particulate and gaseous ambient air pollution on the same or previous days (1-3). This is consistent with even more substantial evidence concerning daily mortality. In the formulation of public health policy it has been assumed that these associations have a causal basis, but at the scientific level there remain important questions concerning residual confounding, the effects of individual pollutants or mixtures, and other factors that may modify health effects. Further evidence on these issues will have an important bearing on conclusions about the cause and mechanisms of the health effects of air pollution.

Because populations are exposed to mixtures rather than to individual pollutants, multicity studies have the potential to create added insights into some of these issues. Those that have been established so far, using the approaches of APHEA (Air Pollution and Health: a European Approach) Phase I (4) and Phase II (5) and NMMAPS (National Mortality and Morbidity Air Pollution Study) (6,7), are confined to the temperate climatic zones. Hong Kong is a large city in a subtropical region where there is evidence of adverse effects of air pollution (8,9). London, United Kingdom, is a city of similar size for which adverse health effects of air pollution have also been reported (10,11). On one hand, there are similarities between the two cities in terms of their main sources and levels of pollutants and patterns of the respiratory and cardiac diseases. On the other hand, there are differences between the two cities in terms of a number of factors that might influence confounding or effect modification; these include demography, climate, housing, lifestyle, patterns of disease, the health care system, and seasonal cycles of both weather and pollution variables.

We have conducted parallel analyses of the short-term associations between air pollution and daily hospital admissions in Hong Kong and London to compare and contrast the health effects of air pollution in the two cities. This comparison has relevance to the understanding of the short-term health effects of air pollution, their consistency, and the factors that may modify their effects.

Methods

Daily emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiac diseases were obtained from routine hospital information systems for Hong Kong (1995-1997) and London (1992-1994). The data included in this study are from patients admitted to hospitals immediately either through the accident and emergency departments, general outpatient departments, or directly to the inpatient wards on the grounds of urgency. The series that we chose for comparison were those selected by the APHEA-2 collaboration; these included asthma [International Classification of Diseases, Revision 9 (ICD-9) code 493] (12) for ages 15-64 years, respiratory disease (ICD-9 460-519) for ages 65 and over, cardiac diseases (ICD-9 396-429) for all ages, and ischemic heart disease (IHD; ICD-9 410-414) for all ages.

Daily average 24-hr concentrations of P[M.sub.10] (particles with median aerodynamic diameter < 10 [micro]m), nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide and average 8-hr concentrations of ozone were collected from background monitoring stations in each city. Only stations able to provide data for 75% or more days during the study periods were used. A daily concentration was accepted as valid if more than 17/24 or 5/8 (in the case of [O.sub.3]) hourly measurements were made. When data were available from more than one monitoring station, we used a simple filling-in procedure to improve data completeness. Missing values were replaced with the mean of values from those stations with available data. The pollutant measures from all stations providing data were then averaged to provide city-wide daily estimates.

We used a statistical approach that closely followed the one adopted by the APHEA-2 study. Poisson regression was used to model the associations between the dependent variable, daily admission counts, and independent variables including nonparametric smooth functions of time, temperature, humidity, and influenza. We used loess functions (13) of time with a minimum span of 60 days to model seasonal fluctuations in admission counts. Temperature and humidity recorded on the day of admission and up to 3 days before admission were investigated and modeled using nonparametric smooth functions, with the degree of smoothing determined by the exposure--response curves and the Akaike's Information Criteria (14). In addition, dummy variables for days of the week, holidays, and unusual events such as thunderstorms and influenza epidemics were included as other independent variables. Daily admission counts for influenza at the 4th quartile (for each week) were used as indicators of influenza epidemics. Models were fitted using a quasi-likelihood method assuming constant over-dispersion over time. This modeling procedure was carried out for each series studied, and the core models were assessed using plots of model residuals and fitted values and plots of the estimated partial autocorrelation functions. Pollution measures were then added in turn, and if necessary, both overdispersion and autocorrelation were further adjusted for using statistical procedures implemented in S-PLUS (Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) (15). We examined concentrations on the day of admission and on the previous 3 days, and the means of the current day and the previous day (lag 0-1).

Any linear effect of the pollutant could be assessed by adding a pollutant measure into the model described above. A possible nonlinear effect of the pollutant was further assessed by an exposure--response relationship generated by generalized additive modeling (16). The procedure involved symmetrical application of a loess smoothing function on a number of pollutant measures around a specific point and estimation of the risk at that specific point. A plot of risk against all the specific points along the x-axis produced an exposure--response curve.

To investigate seasonal differences in the pollution effects, dummy variables were added to the models to indicate season and pollutant-season interaction terms. The warm season was defined as April-September and the cool season was October-March. We derived estimates of the pollutant effects in each season from the models together with p-values for the interaction terms, which indicated whether or not the observed seasonal differences were statistically significant.

We used two-pollutant models to estimate the effects of one pollutant at mean cumulative lag 0-1 days after controlling for another pollutant also at mean cumulative lag 0-1 days.

Results

Background demographic, health, and environmental data. The background characteristics of the two cities have been summarized (Table 1). Hong Kong has a population of over 6 million and occupies an area of approximately 1,000 [km.sup.2], comprising two major islands, some smaller outer islands, a peninsula, the lands adjacent to the mainland, and some reclaimed areas. It is situated at 22.5 [degrees] N latitude at the mouth of the Pearl River, which opens into the South China sea. Hong Kong has a subtropical climate that tends toward the temperate for nearly half the year. The average annual rainfall is 224 cm, most of which falls in the summer months.

Greater London has a population of about 7 million people and occupies a roughly circular basin of 1,600 [km.sup.2], which is bisected east to west by the River Thames and bounded to the north and south by low hills. It lies at a latitude of 45 [degrees] N and has a temperate maritime climate. The average annual rainfall is 58 cm, which falls throughout the year.

Table 2 shows a comparison of relevant demographic, health, and environmental characteristics for Hong Kong and London. The age distributions of the two cities are similar, but age-standardized annual mortality rates are lower in Hong Kong than in London for deaths from all causes and from cardiovascular diseases. Standardized annual rates for admission to public hospitals are higher in Hong Kong than in London for respiratory disease (12.9 vs. 8.0 per 1,000) and for cardiovascular disease (5.8 vs. 5.5 per 1,000). Among respiratory hospital admissions, the proportions due to respiratory infections are similar, but admissions due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are greater in Hong Kong and those due to asthma are higher in London. The relative distributions of subcategories of cardiac diseases were similar except that arrhythmias were more common in Hong Kong.

P[M.sub.10] and N[O.sub.2] emissions in London were both predominantly from traffic (83% and 83%, respectively); in Hong Kong they were from both traffic (61% and 41%, respectively) and power generation (33% and 45%, respectively). S[O.sub.2] in London was almost equally derived from traffic, industry, and power generation (28%, 34%, and 38%, respectively), but in Hong Kong they were mainly from power generation (65%) and industry (21%).

Daily time-series data. Summary statistics for daily counts of admissions, by cause and age, pollutant concentrations, and meteorologic variables are shown in Table 3. Correlations between these variables are shown in Table 4. London had almost twice the median daily count of admissions for asthma as Hong Kong but only two-thirds the median number of admissions for respiratory disease. The numbers of cardiac admissions were more comparable, but London had almost 50% more emergency admissions for IHD than Hong Kong.

The concentrations of N[O.sub.2], S[O.sub.2], and [O.sub.3] were higher in London, whereas P[M.sub.10] levels in Hong Kong were almost double those in London (46.8 vs. 24.8 [micro]g/[m.sup.3]) (Table 3). In Hong Kong, there was a marked seasonal variation in ambient concentrations of N[O.sub.2], [O.sub.3], and P[M.sub.10], all of which were lowest in the warm season and highest in the cool season. In contrast, S[O.sub.2] tended to show less seasonal variation and was highest in the warm season. In London, there was little seasonal variation in N[O.sub.2], S[O.sub.2], or P[M.sub.10], but there was marked seasonal variation in [O.sub.3], which was highest in the warm season. Thus, the only pollutant with a similar seasonal pattern in both cities was S[O.sub.2]. Mean daily temperature was twice as high in Hong Kong as in London (23 [degrees] C vs. 12 [degrees] C), and the mean relative humidity was also higher in Hong Kong. The two cities have similar cycles of temperature, but their seasonal patterns for humidity differ markedly; humidity in Hong Kong is highest in the warm season, but in London it is highest in the cool season (Table 3).

Single-pollutant models. The associations between pollutants (a priori mean lag 0-1 days) and the four admission outcomes are shown in Table 5. We found no statistically significant associations between asthma admissions and any of the four pollutants in either of the cities. For respiratory admissions, we found small, positive, and statistically significant associations with all four pollutants in Hong Kong. By contrast, only [O.sub.3] was significantly associated with respiratory admissions in London. For cardiac diseases, both cities showed significant positive associations of comparable size with N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2]. There were no significant positive associations with [O.sub.3] in Hong Kong, whereas in London it was significantly negative. The direction of effects for IHD was the same as for all cardiac diseases in both cities, but the estimates were lower in Hong Kong than in London (except [O.sub.3]) and none were significant. In London, the relative risks for IHD were similar to those for all cardiac diseases and all were significant; the association with [O.sub.3] was negative.

Results for the most significant single day lag from lags 0 to 3 are shown in Table 6 and illustrated along with the other single day lags in Figure 1. Generally, these results are similar in terms of direction and magnitude to the a priori choice of mean lags 0 and 1. One difference was that in London, the associations between admissions for asthmatic attacks in the 15-64 age group, as well as respiratory disease in the [greater than or equal to] 65 age group and N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2] in the best single lag days, were larger than the a priori (lag 0-1) choice and are statistically significant. These stronger associations all occur with longer lag 3 except once with lag 2. Another clear difference between the two cities was for admissions for IHD. In Hong Kong the most significant associations occurred at lag 2 or 3 days for the four pollutants, whereas in London they were at lag 0 days for N[O.sub.2], [O.sub.3], and S[O.sub.2]. P[M.sub.10] was the exception in London, with the most significant lag occurring at lag 3 days. In both cities however the magnitude of the effects were similar whether at mean lag 0-1 days or the most significant day.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Estimates of pollution effects by season (Table 7) showed contrasting patterns between the two cities for respiratory disease and similar patterns for cardiac disease (Figure 2). In Hong Kong, pollution effects on respiratory disease tended to be greater in the cool season and significantly so for N[O.sub.2] and S[O.sub.2] (Table 7). In London, the pattern was reversed with greater effects in the warm season, significantly so for N[O.sub.2] and P[M.sub.10] (Table 7). The two cities were similar in having larger estimates of cardiac admissions in the cool season (with the exception of [O.sub.3] for London); all of these seasonal interactions were significant for Hong Kong, but only one (P[M.sub.10]) was significant for London (Table 7).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Two-pollutant models. In Hong Kong, associations between respiratory admissions and each of the four pollutants studied tended to be robust to inclusion of a second pollutant into the models (Table 8). There were two exceptions: the P[M.sub.10] and S[O.sub.2] associations were substantially reduced after N[O.sub.2] was added to the models. In London, associations between respiratory admissions and N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2] were nonsignificant and remained unchanged after the addition of a second pollutant. The significant [O.sub.3] associations found in London were robust to the inclusion of an additional pollutant.

For cardiac admissions in Hong Kong, the addition of N[O.sub.2] or S[O.sub.2] reduced the magnitude and statistical significance of N[O.sub.2], S[O.sub.2], and P[M.sub.10] associations ([O.sub.3] was not found to be significant in single-pollutant models). These results were largely replicated in the London analyses, although in a model containing N[O.sub.2] and S[O.sub.2], S[O.sub.2] was clearly the "most robust" pollutant, retaining both the magnitude and statistical significance of its association after the inclusion of N[O.sub.2].

Exposure--response relationships. For respiratory admissions in Hong Kong, a negative exposure--response relationship was observed for concentrations of [O.sub.3] < 20 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] (mainly in the warm season); in London (mainly in the cool season), a neutral relationship was found. For levels of [O.sub.3] > 20 [micro]g/[m.sup.3], there were similar positive linear relationships in both cities (Figure 3).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

For cardiac admissions and P[M.sub.10] between the 10th and 90th percentiles (i.e., 25-87 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] in Hong Kong and 16-46 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] in London), both cities showed positive exposure--response relationships (Figure 3). We observed a negative linear association for [O.sub.3] across the range of the pollutant in London, whereas in Hong Kong we observed a "J"-shaped exposure--response relationship, indicating a positive association between cardiac admissions and the higher levels of [O.sub.3] (data not shown).

For the other exposure--response relationship, there were similarities as well as dissimilarities between the two cities (Figures 4-7), which was quite in agreement with those results presented in Table 5 for the same lag 0-1 day effects.

[FIGURES 4-7 OMITTED]

Discussion

Validity of results. The analytic method was the same in each city and followed the approach adopted by the APHEA collaboration. One of the present authors (R.W.A.) was responsible for analyzing the APHEA 2 respiratory admissions data and worked closely with researchers in Hong Kong to ensure that the application of methods was the same in each city. One feature of this method of Poisson regression is that seasonal, long-term trends and weather factors were modeled using nonparametric methods. This method is widely accepted and has been found to yield comparable results to the earlier method, which uses sinusoidal models for seasonal control (29). It also gives similar results to methods that use a synoptic approach to control for weather factors (30). In a sensitivity analysis, the method of parametric seasonal control was applied to selected series in both London (11) and Hong Kong; results were similar to those observed using the current method, which used generalized additive models (data not shown). The data on air pollution, weather, and outcomes were defined in an identical manner. We did not validate the consistency of hospital diagnosis, but since medical practice and the death certification procedure in Hong Kong has been strongly influenced by British and Commonwealth medical education, it is unlikely that there were major differences. In any case, the adoption of some broad categories (lower respiratory disease and cardiac disease) should have absorbed diagnostic transfer within those groups. The lower level of asthma admissions corresponds to the known lower prevalence of asthma in Hong Kong (31,32). The lack of statistically significant association in asthmatic admissions may be due to the small numbers, relative to the other categories, and low statistical power to detect a significant association.

Respiratory admissions. The results for respiratory admissions were similar when the best single day lag was chosen, with all pollutants showing significant effects in both cities. These results are in line with many other studies (33). However, when the 0-1 day lag was compared, the cities were similar only for [O.sub.3], with only Hong Kong showing significant effects of the other pollutants. This may be explained by the fact that in Hong Kong the effects of P[M.sub.10], N[O.sub.2], and S[O.sub.2] were greatest at early lags, whereas in London the effects were greater with later lags. We have considered whether this difference in lags could be explained by the different primary health care systems. In Hong Kong this is a combination of private practitioners (the great majority) and public out-patient clinics, and heavy use of hospital accident and emergency departments. Perhaps this results in more rapid referral to hospital of persons with severe lower respiratory disease than in London, where the state-provided primary care system takes more responsibility for treating moderately severe disease at home and for controlling access to hospital facilities. We observed that the lag patterns for respiratory mortality associated with N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2] (Figure 8) (34,35) also followed the respective patterns for respiratory admissions (Figure 1). The other difference in the effects of N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2] was that in Hong Kong, the effects were stronger in the cool season, whereas they were stronger in the warm season in London. One common factor here is that the humidity is lower in the season showing the largest effects. It may also be relevant that the average levels of all pollutants apart from S[O.sub.2] are highest during the cool season in Hong Kong.

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

The strong associations between respiratory admissions and N[O.sub.2] and P[M.sub.10] suggest that traffic may be an important source of toxic pollution. In both cities, it has been estimated that only a minority (about 20-40%) of P[M.sub.10] particles in the ambient air (not just for emissions from various sources) is derived from local traffic (36,37). This is consistent with the finding that N[O.sub.2] retains its strong association in two pollutant models while P[M.sub.10] does not.

[O.sub.3] showed consistent significant effects on respiratory admissions, irrespective of whether the mean lag 0-1 days or best single day lag was chosen. The exposure--response relationships with [O.sub.3] were linear in both cities when concentrations were > 20 [micro]g/[m.sup.3], but in Hong Kong, a negative relationship was observed below this level. It could be postulated that the Hong Kong population would be more resistant to [O.sub.3] because the diet is higher in antioxidants and because air conditioning is used in most closed spaces, but our data suggest that both populations are equally susceptible. It is relevant to note that [O.sub.3] also shows associations with respiratory admissions in a range of European cities, with little heterogeneity (33,38). In both London and Hong Kong, the association with [O.sub.3] was very robust to the inclusion of other pollutants in the model.

Cardiac admissions. The results for cardiac admissions were similar for both cities in respect to N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2]. This was irrespective of whether the mean lag 0-1 or the best lag was chosen, because in contrast to respiratory admissions, both cities displayed the same lag patterns, with lower risks at longer lags. These results add to the accumulating evidence worldwide that air pollution has short-term effects on cardiac admissions. Our evidence indicates that within the cardiac group of diagnoses, there are also effects on ischemic heart disease, but we do not know from this study if the same applies to other diagnoses such as cardiac failure or cardiac arrhythmias. However, we previously demonstrated an effect of [O.sub.3] in the cool season on admissions for these cardiac events in the elderly in Hong Kong (8). The exposure--response relationships with N[O.sub.2], P[M.sub.10], and S[O.sub.2] were linear in both cities, and there were similar seasonal associations, with both cities having larger effects in the cool season. The two-pollutant models also showed considerable similarities, with N[O.sub.2] being robust to the inclusion of P[M.sub.10] in the models but affected to some extent by S[O.sub.2]. In both cities, the effect of S[O.sub.2] retained its statistical significance in the presence of all the other pollutants.

Relevance of results. The principal aim of this study was to determine if the effects of air pollution on daily hospital admissions are consistent between Hong Kong and London. An important component of causal thinking in observational studies is whether the associations are consistent in widely varying environments. This is one way in which concerns about unknown or inadequately controlled confounding can be addressed. In air pollution time-series studies, this is especially important because other components of causal reasoning such as size of effect, biological plausibility, and coherence are less convincing than many would wish. Hong Kong and London differ markedly in many respects that could affect confounding or effect modification, especially in climate and lifestyle. We have based our comparison on the size, significance, and direction of estimates of effect, lag pattern, exposure--response relationship, and seasonal effects. We conclude overall that there are considerable similarities in the effects of each pollutant, although the explanations for some differences, including a lack of association with asthma admissions in adults in Hong Kong, differences in the lag pattern for all respiratory admissions, and opposite directions of effect for [O.sub.3] and cardiac admissions, remain uncertain. Overall, we consider the similarities to outweigh the differences; thus, we conclude that our study strengthens the argument for the causality of air pollution associations with hospital admissions.

The comparison has done less to clarify which component of the pollution mixture is important. The [O.sub.3] associations with respiratory disease are at least independent of other pollutants and in line with studies elsewhere. There is also evidence that [O.sub.3] is potentially toxic at near ambient levels (2). For cardiac admissions, the P[M.sub.10] associations were less independent of N[O.sub.2] (and in some cases S[O.sub.2]) than the reverse. Toxicologic evidence suggests that N[O.sub.2] and S[O.sub.2] are unlikely to have effects at this level, which points toward them being surrogates for some other toxic component. P[M.sub.10] is widely regarded as important in spite of meagre human toxicologic corroboration. The cities were similar in the proportion of fine particles comprising P[M.sub.10] and in other components such as sulfate (as an indicator of secondary particles) and carbon (as an indicator of primary particles) (36,39-41). Our study, like many others, suggests that traffic sources are important but cannot be more specific. Analysis using many, rather than only two, cities may be one way of learning more about the effects of different pollution mixtures (42).

Table 1. Comparison of environmental factors of Hong Kong and London.

Environmental factor     Hong Kong              London

Population (millions)    6.2 (1995) (a)         6.9 (1992) (b)
Area ([km.sup.2])        1,092                  1,580
Climate                  Subtropical, with      Maritime, with mild
                           rain and tropical      winters and
                           cyclones in the        temperate summers
                           summer months
Mean January/July
  temperatures
  ([degree] C)           16/29                  3/23
Rainfall                 224 cm, most falling   58 cm, evenly
                           in the summer          distributed
                           months                 through the year
Topography               Peninsula with         Estuarine river
                           offshore islands       basin
Lifestyle
  Smoking rates
    ([greater than or
    equal to] 15 years
    of age)              Male 26.7%;            Male 28%;
                           female 3.1% (c)        female 27% (d)
  Regular alcohol
    consumers            Male 20.0%;            Male 27%;
                           female 2.0% (e)        female 11% (d)
Health care system       Primary care           National Health
                           services provided      Service
                           mainly by private
                           sector (85%)
                         Hospital services
                           provided mainly by
                           public sector
                           (86%)
Median size of private
  dwellings              40.0-69.9              85 [m.sup.2] (f)
                           [m.sup.2] (a)
GDP per capita (with
  adjustment for
  purchasing power
  parity)                U.S. $20,458 (g)       U.S. $20,890 (g)
Leading causes of
  death                  (1996 data) (h)        (1996 data) (i)
                         1. Malignant           1. Circulatory
                            neoplasms, 31.3%       diseases, 42.6%
                         2. Heart diseases,     2. Malignant
                            15.8%                  neoplasms, 25.0%
                         3. Cerebrovascular     3. Respiratory
                            disease, 10.7%         diseases, 15.9%
                         4. Pneumonia (all      4. Digestive
                            forms), 10.6%          diseases, 3.6%
                         5. Injury and          5. Injury and
                            poisoning, 5.1%        poisoning, 2.9%

GDP, gross domestic product.

(a) Data from the Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics (17). (b) Data
from the Office of Population and Censuses Surveys (18). (c) Data from
the Census and Statistics Department (19). (d) Data from Statistics on
Smoking: England, 1976 to 1996 (20). (e) Data from Janus et al. (21);
alcohol consumption at least once per week (25-74 years of age).
(f) Data from the Office of National Statistics (22). (g) Data from
Asia Week (23). (h) Department of Health. Department of Health Annual
Report (24). (i) Data from the Office of National Statistics (25).
Table 2. Comparison of selected health and air pollution statistics
between Hong Kong and London.

Health variable                          Hong Kong          London

Population < 15/> 65 years of            18.9/10.0         18.8/13.9
  age (%)                               (1996) (a)        (1992) (b)
Infant mortality rate (per 1,000
  live births)                              4.0               7.2
Age-standardized mortality (c)
    (per 1,000 population)
  From all causes                           3.7               4.5
  From respiratory diseases                 0.7               0.5
  From cardiovascular diseases              0.9               1.9
Emergency admissions for
    respiratory disease
  Respiratory (% of all causes)         10.0 (1996)     5.1 (1992/1993)
  Age standardized rate (c)
    (per 1,000 population)                 12.9         8.0 (1992-1994)
  Age distribution (%)
    0-14 years                              33                35
    15-64 years                             22                26
    [greater than or equal to]
      65 years                              45                39
  Subcategories (%)
    Lower respiratory infections
      (ICD-9 466, 480-487)                  23                22
    Asthma (ICD-9 493)                      13                25
    COPD (ICD-9 490-496,
      excluding 493)                        24                15
Emergency admissions for
    cardiovascular disease
  Cardiovascular (% of all causes)      7.6 (1996)      5.9 (1992/1993)
  Age standardized rate (per 1,000
      population)                           5.8         5.5 (1992-1994)
    Age distribution (%)
      0-14 years                             2                 0
      15-64 years                           37                32
      [greater than or equal to] 65
        years                               61                68
    Subcategories (%)
      Stroke (ICD-9 430-438)                22                19
      Cardiac (ICD-9 390-429)               63                70
      [Ischemic heart disease
        (ICD-9 410-414)]                    37                30
      [Arrhythmias (ICD-9 427)]             20                 9
      [Cardiac failure (ICD-9 428)]         22                18
  Sources of pollutant emissions      (1997) (d) (TSP     (1997) (e)
                                         including
                                       P[M.sub.10])
    P[M.sub.10] (%)
      Traffic (vehicle, marine
        vessel, aircraft)                   61                83
      Industry                               6                11
      Power generation (and heating
        for London)                         33                 6
    N[O.sub.x] (%)
      Traffic (vehicle, marine
        vessel, aircraft)                   41                83
      Industry                               8                 5
      Power generation (and heating
        for London)                         45                13
    S[O.sub.2] (%)
      Traffic (vehicle, marine
        vessel, aircraft)                   14                28
      Industry                              21                34
      Power generation (and heating
        for London)                         65                38

TSP, total suspended particulate.

(a) Data from the Hong Kong Department of Health (24). (b) Data from
the Office of Population and Censuses Surveys (18). (c) The standard
population was adopted from Segi (26). (d) Data from the Planning,
Environment and Lands Bureau (27). (e) Data from the London Research
Centre (26).
Table 3. Summary statistics for daily hospital admissions, pollutant
concentrations, and meteorologic measurements in Hong Kong
(1995-1997) and London (1992-1994); n = 1,096 days.

Variable, city                   Mean     (Warm/cool)     SD

Emergency hospital admission
      (no./day)
  Asthma (ICD-9 493),
      15-64 years
    Hong Kong                      7.8     (7.0/8.6)      3.4
    London                        14.1    (13.0/15.1)     5.8
  Respiratory (ICD-9 460-519),
      [greater than or equal
      to] 65 years
    Hong Kong                     91.3    (86.7/96.1)    22.5
    London                        58.3    (49.5/67.4)    19.4
  Cardiac (ICD-9 390-429),
      all ages
    Hong Kong                     98.7    (94.0/103.4)   23.3
    London                       121.1   (118.3/124.0)   23.4
  IHD (ICD-9 410-414),
      all ages
    Hong Kong                     36.0    (35.3/36.7)    10.3
    London                        51.3    (50.5/52.0)    10.0
Pollutant concentration (daily
    [micro]g/[m.sup.3])
  N[O.sub.2] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (a)                 55.9    (48.1/63.8)    19.4
    London (b)                    64.3    (62.6/66.1)    20.4
  [O.sub.3] (8 hr)
    Hong Kong (c)                 33.5    (32.0/35.1)    23.0
    London (d)                    34.9    (45.3/24.0)    23.1
  P[M.sub.10] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (e)                 51.8    (42.2/61.6)    25.0
    London (f)                    28.5    (28.2/28.8)    13.7
  S[O.sub.2] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (g)                 17.7    (18.3/17.2)    12.3
    London (h)                    23.7    (22.2/25.3)    12.3
Meteorologic measurements
    (daily)
  Temperature ([degrees] C)
    Hong Kong                     23.2    (27.2/19.0)     5.0
    London                        11.9    (15.5/8.3)      5.0
  Humidity (%)
    Hong Kong                     77.7    (80.7/74.7)    10.6
    London                        70.6    (67.5/73.7)    10.9

                                            Percentile

Variable, city                   Min    10th   50th    90th     Max

Emergency hospital admission
      (no./day)
  Asthma (ICD-9 493),
      15-64 years
    Hong Kong                     0.0    4.0     7.0    12.0    24.0
    London                        2.0    8.0    13.0    21.0    85.0
  Respiratory (ICD-9 460-519),
      [greater than or equal
      to] 65 years
    Hong Kong                    45.0   64.0    88.0   122.0   174.0
    London                       13.0   37.0    55.0    82.0   150.0
  Cardiac (ICD-9 390-429),
      all ages
    Hong Kong                    40.0   67.0   101.0   127.5   176.0
    London                       50.0   89.0   121.0   152.0   196.0
  IHD (ICD-9 410-414),
      all ages
    Hong Kong                     8.0   23.0    35.0    49.0    76.0
    London                       22.0   39.0    51.0    64.0    86.0
Pollutant concentration (daily
    [micro]g/[m.sup.3])
  N[O.sub.2] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (a)                15.3   31.8    53.5    81.8   151.5
    London (b)                   23.7   42.3    61.2    88.8   255.8
  [O.sub.3] (8 hr)
    Hong Kong (c)                 0      7.9    28.3    64.0   168.9
    London (d)                    2.4    8.6    32.0    60.1   159.8
  P[M.sub.10] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (e)                14.1   24.7    46.8    87.2   163.8
    London (f)                    6.8   15.8    24.8    46.4    99.8
  S[O.sub.2] (24 hr)
    Hong Kong (g)                 1.1    6.2    14.5    32.8    90.0
    London (h)                    6.2   13.2    20.6    38.1   113.6
Meteorologic measurements
    (daily)
  Temperature ([degrees] C)
    Hong Kong                     6.9   16.0    24.3    29.1    30.9
    London                       -0.8    5.6    11.8    18.6    25.5
  Humidity (%)
    Hong Kong                    31.0   64.0    79.0    90.0    97.0
    London                       41.0   56.0    70.0    85.0    97.0

Abbreviations: Max, maximum; Min, minimum.

(a) r = 0.65-0.90 between seven stations. (b) r = around 0.8 between
three stations. (c) r = 0.79 between two stations. (d) r = 0.95 between
two stations. (e) r = 0.92-0.97 between five stations. (f) Only one
station involved. (g) r = 0.44-0.81 between five stations. (h) r = -0.1
to 0.8 (median 0.5) in six stations.
Table 4. Matrix of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r)
between mean daily concentration of pollutants and meteorologic
data (1995-1997).

                   S[O.     P[M.      [O.     Tempe-
                  sub.2]   sub.10]   sub.3]   rature   Humidity

Hong Kong
  Whole year
    N[O.sub.2]     0.37     0.82       0.43    -0.45    -0.35
    S[O.sub.2]              0.30      -0.18     0.17    -0.16
    P[M.sub.10]                        0.54    -0.42    -0.53
    [O.sub.3]                                  -0.14    -0.59
    Temperature                                          0.19
  Warm season
    N[O.sub.2]     0.28     0.80       0.54    -0.43    -0.18
    S[O.sub.2]              0.22      -0.14     0.37    -0.16
    P[M.sub.10]                        0.65    -0.25    -0.40
    [O.sub.3]                                  -0.17    -0.57
    Temperature                                         -0.26
  Cool season
    N[O.sub.2]     0.61     0.72       0.23     0.10    -0.36
    S[O.sub.2]              0.53      -0.21     0.13    -0.20
    P[M.sub.10]                        0.36     0.01     0.55
    [O.sub.3]                                   0.05    -0.60
    Temperature                                          0.21

                   S[O.     P[M.      [O.     Tempe-
                  sub.2]   sub.10]   sub.3]   rature   Humidity

London
  Whole year
    N[O.sub.2]     0.71     0.68      -0.29    -0.16     0.01
    S[O.sub.2]              0.64      -0.25    -0.13    -0.15
    P[M.sub.10]                        0.17     0.02    -0.05
    [O.sub.3]                                   0.47    -0.52
    Temperature                                         -0.27
  Warm season
    N[O.sub.2]     0.66     0.68       0.05     0.08    -0.09
    S[O.sub.2]              0.56       0.14     0.26    -0.33
    P[M.sub.10]                        0.27     0.32    -0.14
    [O.sub.3]                                   0.26    -0.53
    Temperature                                          0.26
  Cool season
    N[O.sub.2]     0.76     0.68      -0.61    -0.36     0.01
    S[O.sub.2]              0.70      -0.58    -0.46    -0.05
    P[M.sub.10]                       -0.56     0.23     0.01
    [O.sub.3]                                   0.29    -0.37
    Temperature                                          0.05
Table 5. Summary of single-pollutant excess risk
(ER) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for a 10 [micro]g/[m.sup.3]
change in pollutant concentration for mean lag 0-1
day: comparison between Hong Kong and London.

Emergency
admission                  Hong Kong           London
complaints, age           ER (95% CI)       ER (95% CI)

Asthma, 15-64 years
  N[O.sub.2]            -0.6 (-2.1-1.0)    1.0 (0.0-2.1)
  [O.sub.3]              0.0 (-1.3-1.4)   -0.7 (-1.8-0.4)
  P[M.sub.10]           -1.1 (-2.4-0.1)    1.4 (-0.1-3.0)
  S[O.sub.2]            -0.1 (-2.4-2.2)    0.7 (-1.0-2.5)
Respiratory, [greater
    than or equal to]
    65 years
  N[O.sub.2]             1.8 (1.2-2.4)    -0.1 (-0.6-0.5)
  [O.sub.3]              0.8 (0.3-1.3)     0.8 (0.2-1.4)
  P[M.sub.10]            1.0 (0.5-1.5)     0.4 (-0.3-1.2)
  S[O.sub.2]             1.8 (0.9-2.6)     0.2 (-0.6-1.1)
Cardiac, all ages
  N[O.sub.2]             1.4 (0.9-2.0)     0.7 (0.3-1.0)
  [O.sub.3]              0.3 (-0.2-0.7)   -0.6 (-1.0--0.1)
  P[M.sub.10]            0.7 (0.3-1.1)     0.8 (0.3-1.4)
  S[O.sub.2]             2.1 (1.3-2.8)     1.6 (1.0-2.2)
IHD, all ages
  N[O.sub.2]             0.6 (-0.2-1.4)    0.7 (0.2-1.2)
  [O.sub.3]              0.4 (-0.3-1.1)   -0.8 (-1.4--0.2)
  P[M.sub.10]            0.5 (-0.1-1.1)    0.9 (0.1-1.6)
  S[O.sub.2]             0.1 (-1.1-1.2)    1.7 (0.8-2.6)
Table 6. Summary of single-pollutant excess risk (ER) and 95%
confidence interval (CI) for a 10 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] change in
pollutant concentration for the best single lag day: comparison
between Hong Kong and London.

                            Hong Kong                 London

Emergency admission
complaints, age       Lag     ER (95% CI)     Lag     ER (95% CI)

Asthma, 15-64 years
  N[O.sub.2]           1    -1.3 (-2.6-0.1)    2     1.1 (0.2-2.0)
  [O.sub.3]            2     1.2 (0.0-2.4)     0    -0.7 (-1.7-0.3)
  P[M.sub.10]          0    -1.1 (-2.1-0.0)    2     2.2 (0.8-3.6)
  S[O.sub.2]           2    -1.5 (-3.4-0.5)    3     2.1 (0.7-3.6)
Respiratory,
    [greater than
    or equal to]
    65 years
  N[O.sub.2]           0     1.3 (0.8-1.8)     3     0.9 (0.5-1.3)
  [O.sub.3]            1     0.6 (0.2-1.0)     0     0.6 (0.1-1.2)
  P[M.sub.10]          0     0.7 (0.3-1.0)     3     1.5 (0.8-2.2)
  S[O.sub.2]           0     1.7 (1.0-2.4)     3     1.2 (0.5-2.0)
Cardiac, all ages
  N[O.sub.2]           0     1.2 (0.7-1.7)     0     0.7 (0.4-1.0)
  [O.sub.3]            2     0.5 (0.1-0.8)     0    -0.8 (-1.2--0.4)
  P[M.sub.10]          0     0.5 (0.2-0.9)     0     1.1 (0.5-1.5)
  S[O.sub.2]           0     1.6 (1.0-2.2)     0     1.4 (0.9-1.9)
IHD, all ages
  N[O.sub.2]           3     0.7 (0.1-1.4)     0     0.7 (0.2-1.1)
  [O.sub.3]            3     0.5 (0.0-1.0)     0    -0.9 (-1.4--0.3)
  P[M.sub.10]          2     0.5 (-0.1-1.0)    3     0.3 (-0.5-1.0)
  S[O.sub.2]           2     0.4 (-0.5-1.4)    0     1.4 (0.7-2.2)
Table 7. Summary of single-pollutant results in excess risk (ER) and
95% confidence interval (CI) for a 10 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] change in
concentration at mean lag 0-1 day in warm and cool seasons.

Emergency
admission                      Warm              Cool
complaints, age             ER (95% CI)       ER (95% CI)

Hong Kong
  Asthma, 15-64 years
    N[O.sub.2]            -0.5 (-2.7-1.6)   -0.6 (-2.8-1.6)
    [O.sub.3]             -0.3 (-2.0-1.3)    0.6 (-1.4-2.6)
    P[M.sub.10]           -1.0 (-2.8-0.8)   -1.2 (-2.8-0.4)
    S[O.sub.2]             1.5 (-1.5-4.6)   -2.0 (-5.4-1.4)
  Respiratory, [greater
      than or equal to]
      65 years
    N[O.sub.2]             0.8 (0.1-1.6)     3.0 (2.1-3.9)
    [O.sub.3]              0.8 (0.2-1.4)     1.0 (0.2-1.7)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.8 (0.1-1.4)     1.2 (0.6-1.9)
    S[O.sub.2]             1.1 (0.0-2.2)     2.7 (1.4-4.0)
  Cardiac, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]             0.3 (-0.4-1.0)    2.6 (1.9-3.3)
    [O.sub.3]              0.0 (-0.5-0.6)    0.9 (0.2-1.6)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.0 (-0.6-0.6)    1.3 (0.8-1.9)
    S[O.sub.2]             1.0 (0.0-2.0)     3.3 (2.1-4.4)
  IHD, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]             0.1 (-0.9-1.2)    1.2 (0.0-2.3)
    [O.sub.3]              0.4 (-0.4-1.2)    0.6 (-0.5-1.6)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.2 (-0.7-1.0)    0.8 (-0.1-1.6)
    S[O.sub.2]            -0.6 (-2.0-0.8)    1.0 (-0.8-2.8)

Emergency
admission                     Significance for pollutant
complaints, age                 by season interaction

Hong Kong
  Asthma, 15-64 years
    N[O.sub.2]
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]
    S[O.sub.2]
  Respiratory, [greater
      than or equal to]
      65 years
    N[O.sub.2]            p [less than or equal to] 0.001
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]
    S[O.sub.2]            p [less than or equal to] 0.05
  Cardiac, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]            p [less than or equal to] 0.001
    [O.sub.3]             p [less than or equal to] 0.05
    P[M.sub.10]           p [less than or equal to] 0.001
    S[O.sub.2]            p [less than or equal to] 0.01
  IHD, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]
    S[O.sub.2]

Emergency
admission                      Warm               Cool
complaints, age             ER (95% CI)       ER (95% CI)

London
  Asthma, 15-64 years
    N[O.sub.2]             0.6 (-0.8-2.0)    1.3 (-0.1-2.8)
    [O.sub.3]             -0.1 (-1.4-1.2)   -2.6 (-4.6--0.5)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.6 (-1.9-3.1)    1.6 (-0.3-3.6)
    S[O.sub.2]            -1.4 (-4.7-1.9)    1.6 (-0.5-3.8)
  Respiratory, [greater
      than or equal to]
      65 years
    N[O.sub.2]             0.6 (-0.2-1.4)   -0.7 (-1.4-0.0)
    [O.sub.3]              1.0 (0.3-1.7)     0.2 (-0.7-1.2)
    P[M.sub.10]            1.8 (0.5-3.1)    -0.5 (-1.5-0.5)
    S[O.sub.2]             1.3 (-0.5-3.1)   -0.3 (-1.3-0.8)
  Cardiac, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]             0.4 (-0.1-0.9)    0.8 (0.3-1.4)
    [O.sub.3]             -0.2 (-0.7-0.3)   -1.1 (-1.8--0.4)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.1 (-0.7-1.0)    1.2 (0.5-2.0)
    S[O.sub.2]             0.6 (-0.6-1.7)    1.9 (1.2-2.7)
  IHD, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]             0.4 (-0.3-1.1)    1.0 (0.2-1.7)
    [O.sub.3]             -0.5 (-1.2-0.2)   -1.3 (-2.3--0.3)
    P[M.sub.10]            0.1 (-1.1-1.4)    1.3 (0.3-2.3)
    S[O.sub.2]             1.0 (-0.6-2.6)    2.0 (0.9-3.1)

Emergency
admission                    Significance for pollutant
complaints, age                 by season interaction

London
  Asthma, 15-64 years
    N[O.sub.2]
    [O.sub.3]             p [less than or equal to] 0.05
    P[M.sub.10]
    S[O.sub.2]
  Respiratory, [greater
      than or equal to]
      65 years
    N[O.sub.2]            p [less than or equal to] 0.01
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]           p [less than or equal to] 0.01
    S[O.sub.2]
  Cardiac, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]           p [less than or equal to] 0.01
    S[O.sub.2]
  IHD, all ages
    N[O.sub.2]
    [O.sub.3]
    P[M.sub.10]
    S[O.sub.2]
Table 8. Excess risk (ER) and 95% confidence interval (CI)
for a 10 [micro]g/[m.sup.3] change in mean concentration
of lag 0-1 day in each air pollutant from a single- and
co-pollutant model.

                    After adjusting for co-pollutant

Emergency           N[O.sub.2]             [O.sub.3]
admission           ER (95% CI)           ER (95% CI)

Respiratory
  N[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.8 (1.2-2.4) (a)     1.6 (1.0-2.3)
    London      -0.1 (-0.6-0.5) (a)    0.1 (-0.5-0.6)
  [O.sub.3]
    Hong Kong    0.5 (0.0-1.0)         0.8 (0.3-1.3) (a)
    London       0.8 (0.2-1.4)         0.8 (0.2-1.4) (a)
  P[M.sub.10]
    Hong Kong    0.0 (-0.7-0.7)        0.8 (0.3-1.3)
    London       0.9 (-0.3-2.0)        0.4 (-0.3-1.2)
  S[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    0.3 (-0.7-1.4)        1.9 (1.1-2.8)
    London       0.5 (-0.7-1.7)        0.5 (-0.4-1.5)
Cardiac
  N[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.4 (0.9-2.0) (a)     1.5 (0.9-2.0)
    London       0.7 (0.3-1.0) (a)     0.7 (0.3-1.1)
  [O.sub.3]
    Hong Kong   -0.1 (-0.6-0.4)        0.3 (-0.2-0.7) (a)
    London      -0.5 (-0.9-0.0)       -0.6 (-1.0--0.1) (a)
  P[M.sub.10]
    Hong Kong   -0.3 (-0.9-0.4)        0.7 (0.3-1.2)
    London       0.2 (-0.6-1.0)        0.8 (0.3-1.3)
  S[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.4 (0.4-2.3)         2.1 (1.4-2.9)
    London       1.4 (0.6-2.3)         1.6 (0.9-2.2)

                    After adjusting for co-pollutant

Emergency           P[M.sub.10]           S[O.sub.2]
admission           ER (95% CI)           ER (95% CI)

Respiratory
  N[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.7 (0.8-2.7)         1.6 (0.8-2.4)
    London      -0.4 (-1.2-0.4)       -0.2 (-0.9-0.5)
  [O.sub.3]
    Hong Kong    0.5 (0.0-1.1)         1.0 (0.5-1.5)
    London       1.1 (0.5-1.7)         0.9 (0.3-1.5)
  P[M.sub.10]
    Hong Kong    1.0 (0.5-1.5) (a)     0.6 (0.1-1.1)
    London       0.4 (-0.3-1.2) (a)    0.7 (-0.5-1.8)
  S[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.2 (0.3-2.2)         1.8 (0.9-2.6) (a)
    London      -0.4 (-1.8-1.0)        0.2 (-0.6-1.1) (a)
Cardiac
  N[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    1.7 (0.9-2.5)         0.7 (0.1-1.4)
    London       0.6 (0.0-1.2)         0.1 (-0.3-0.6)
  [O.sub.3]
    Hong Kong    0.0 (-0.5-05)         0.4 (-0.1-0.9)
    London      -0.6 (-1.0--0.1)      -0.3 (-0.8-0.1)
  P[M.sub.10]
    Hong Kong    0.7 (0.3-1.1) (a)     0.1 (-0.4-0.6)
    London       0.8 (0.3-1.4) (a)    -0.3 (-1.1-0.4)
  S[O.sub.2]
    Hong Kong    2.0 (1.1-2.8)         2.1 (1.3-2.8) (a)
    London       2.2 (1.2-3.2)         1.6 (1.0-2.2) (a)

(a) Estimates from the single-pollutant model.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

(1.) Pope III CA, Dockery OW. Epidemiology of particle effects. In: Air Pollution and Health (Holgate ST, Samet JM, Koren HS, Maynard RL, eds). San Diego, CA:Academic Press, 1999;673-705.

(2.) Thurston GD, Ito K. Epidemiological studies of ozone exposure effects. In: Air Pollution and Health (Holgate ST, Samet JM, Koren HS, Maynard RL, eds). San Diego, CA:Academic Press, 1999;485-510.

(3.) Committee of the Environmental and Occupational Healthy Assembly of the American Thoracic Society. Health effects of outdoor air pollution. Part 1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:3-50 (1996).

(4.) Katsouyanni K, Schwartz J, Spix C, Touloumi G, Zmirou D, Zanobetti A, Wojtyniak B, Vonk JM, Tobias A, Ponka A, et al. Short term effects of air pollution on health: a European approach using epidemiologic time series data: the APHEA protocol. J Epidemiol Community Health 50(suppl 1):S12-S18 (1996).

(5.) Katsouyanni K. Personal communication.

(6.) Samet JM, Dominici F, Zeger SL, Schwartz J, Dockery DW. The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study Part I: Methods and Methodologic Issues Research Report 94. Cambridge, MA:Health Effects Institute, 2000.

(7.) Samet JM, Zeger SL, Dominici F, Curriero F, Coursac I, Dockery DW, Schwartz J, Zanobetti A. The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study Part II: Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution in the United States. Research Report 94. Cambridge, MA:Health Effects Institute, 2000.

(8.) Wong CM, Ma S, Hedley AJ, Lam TH. Does ozone have any effect on daily hospital admissions for circulatory diseases? J Epidemiol Community Health 53:580-581 (1999).

(9.) Wong TW, Lau TS, Yu TS, Neller A, Wong SL, Tam W, Pang SW. Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Hong Kong. Occup Environ Med 56:679-683 (1999).

(10.) Ponce de Leon A, Anderson HR, Bland JM, Strachan DP, Bower J. Effects of air pollution on daily hospital admissions for respiratory disease in London between 1987-88 and 1991-92. J Epidemiol Community Health 33(suppl 1):S63-S70 (1996).

(11.) Atkinson RW, Bremner SA, Anderson HR, Strachan DP, Bland JM, Ponce de Leon A. Short-term associations between emergency hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular disease and outdoor air pollution in London. Arch Environ Health 54:398-411 (1999).

(12.) WHO. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death: Based on the Recommendations of the 9th Revision Conference, 1975, and Adopted by the Twenty-Ninth World Health Assembly. Geneva:World Health Organization, 1977-78.

(13.) Cleveland RB, Cleveland W, McRae JE, Terpening I. STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J Off Stat 6:3-73 (1990).

(14.) Akaike H. Information theory and extension of maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (Petrov BN, Casaki F, eds). Budapest:Akademia Kiado, 1973;267-281.

(15.) Schwartz J, Spix C, Touloumi G, Bacharova L, Barumamdzadeh T, le Tertre A, Piekarksi T, Ponce de Leon A, Ponka A, Rossi G, et al. Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and daily counts of deaths or hospital admissions. J Epidemiol Community Health 50(suppl 1):S3-S11 (1996).

(16.) Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. Generalized Additive Models. London:Chapman and Hall, 1990.

(17.) Census and Statistics Department. Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics 1998. Hong Kong:Census and Statistics Department, 1998.

(18.) Office of Population and Censuses Surveys. 1992 Mortality Statistics. Series DH5 No. 19, England and Wales. London:Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1992.

(19.) Census and Statistics Department. Social Data Collected via the General Household Survey. Special Topics Report No. 20. Hong Kong:Census and Statistics Department 1998.

(20.) Department of Health. Statistics on Smoking: England, 1976 to 1996. London:Department of Health, 1998.

(21.) Janus ED, Cockram CS, Fielding R, Hedley AJ, Ho P, Lam KSL, Lam TH, Lau CP, Lo M, Lo SC, et al. Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study 1995-1996. Hong Kong:Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Mary Hospital of Hong Kong, 1996.

(22.) Office for National Statistics. Living in Britain: Results from the 1996 General Household Survey. London:Stationery Office, 1998.

(23.) The Bottom Line. Available: http://www.asiaweek.com/ asiaweek/magazine/2000/1027/bottomline.html [cited 6 December 2001].

(24.) Department of Health. Department of Health Annual Report 1996/97. Hong Kong:Department of Health, 1998.

(25.) Office of National Statistics. Mortality Statistics: England and Wales. London:Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1996.

(26.) Segi M. Cancer Mortality for Selected Sites in 24 Countries (1950-1957). Sendai, Japan:Tohoku University School of Public Health, 1960.

(27.) Planning, Environment and Lands Bureau. Clean Air in Hong Kong. Available: http://www.info.gov.hk/ efb/link/cleanair/index.html [cited 6 December 2001].

(28.) Buckingham C, Clewley L, Sadler L, Shah S. London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory. London:London Research Centre, 1997.

(29.) Kelsall JE, Samet JM, Zeger SL, Xu J. Air pollution and mortality in Philadelphia, 1974-1988. Am J Epidemiol 146:750-762 (1997).

(30.) Samet J, Zeger S, Kelsall J, Xu J, Kalkstein L. Does weather confound or modify the association of particulate air pollution with mortality. Environ Res 77:9-19 (1998).

(31.) Leung R, Ho P. Asthma, allergy, and atopy in three southeast Asian populations. Thorax 49:1205-1210 (1994).

(32.) Worldwide variations in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Eur Respir J 12:315-335 (1998).

(33.) Spix C, Anderson HR, Schwartz J, Vigotti MA, LeTertre A, Vonk JM, Touloumi D, Balducci F, Piekarski T, Bacharova L, et al. Short-term effects of air pollution on hospital admissions of respiratory diseases in Europe: a quantitative summary of APHEA study results. Air Pollution and Health: a European Approach. Arch Environ Health 53:54-64 (1998).

(34.) Bremner SA, Anderson HR, Atkinson RW, McMichael AJ, Strachan DP, Bland JM, Bower JS. Short-term associations between outdoor air pollution and mortality in London 1992-4. Occup Environ Med 56:237-244 (1999).

(35.) Wong CM, Ma S, Hedley AJ, Lam TH. Effect of air pollution on daily mortality in Hong Kong. Environ Health Perspect 109:335-340 (2001).

(36.) Stedman JR, Linehan E, Conlan B. Receptor modelling of P[M.sub.10] concentrations at a United Kingdom National Network Monitoring site in Central London. Atmos Environ 35:297-304 (2000).

(37.) Wu C. Personal communication.

(38.) Anderson HR, Ponce de Leon A, Bland JM, Bower JS, Emberlin J, Strachan DP. Air pollution, pollens, and daily admissions for asthma in London 1987-92. Thorax 53:842-848 (1998).

(39.) Environmental Protection Department. Air Quality in Hong Kong 1995. Hong Kong:Environmental Protection Department, 1996.

(40.) Environmental Protection Department. Air Quality in Hong Kong 1996. Hong Kong:Environmental Protection Department, 1997

(41.) Environmental Protection Department. Air Quality in Hong Kong 1997. Hong Kong:Environmental Protection Department, 1998.

(42.) Levy JI, Hammitt JK, Spengler JD. Estimating the mortality impacts of particulate matter: what can be learned from between-study variability? Environ Health Perspect 108:109-117 (2000).

Chit-Ming Wong, (1) Richard W Atkinson, (2) H. Ross Anderson, (2) Anthony Johnson Hedley, (1) Stefan Ma, (1) Patsy Yuen-Kwan Chau, (1) and Tai-Hing Lam (1)

(1) Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; (2) Department of Public Health Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to A.J. Hedley, Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Patrick Manson Building South Wing, 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China. Telephone: [phone]. Fax: [phone]. E-mail: [e-mail]

We thank the Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department for data on air pollutant concentrations and the Hong Kong Hospital Authority for information on hospital admissions; we also thank T.Q. Thach for statistical analysis and M. Chi for clerical support.

This project was sponsored by the British Council, the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, and L. Shiu. The Royal Society Kan Tong Po Visiting Professorship provided support to H.R. Anderson.

Received 15 December 2000; accepted 15 June 2001.