A summary of points of view.
A Summary of Points of View
THE ISSUES WHAT OPPONENTS SAY
Creating a NEW * We may need this type of credential 20 years
Credential from today, but not now
* The Big 5 don't need and won't use this type of
credential because the firms' names are their
brands
* Credential makes end run around regulatory
system needed to protect public interest
* CPAs "do it all" already and don't need other
credentials to validate competencies outside those
associated with the CPA license
* The CPA brand provides all the clout a
professional needs in today's marketplace
* Will confuse the market and ultimately diminish
the CPA brand
* If the market doesn't accept the new credential,
the CPA will be undermined
* CPAs are already too busy; they don't have time
to pursue and maintain other credentials
* AICPA is pursuing this credential to increase
its membership numbers
* The AICPA cannot afford to support both the
CPA and the proposed credential
* If CPAs want a broader credential, they should
get an MBA
Admitting Other * Creates new sources of competition
Professions * Professionalizes the competition and gives them
leg up over CPAs
* If it is created, credential should be reserved
only for CPAs
* Quality of credential holders will not be up to
standards of the CPA profession
* CPAs already have ability to outsource to
non-CPA or CPA firms and have extensive access to
expert networks
* Entry exam should be closed to all other
professionals
Spending * Detracts from other initiatives
Member Dues * Most CPAs are not interested in obtaining the
credential
* Funds being spent on the credential should be
added to AICPA advertising campaign on behalf of
the CPA profession
* CPAs are less interested in the AICPA's
investment in long-term strategies than in
immediate remedies to today's challenges
* AICPA cannot afford to support CPA and new
global credential
Developing an * Sounds like jack of all trades and master of
Interdisciplinary none
Framework * No one professional can know and do everything
that's required
Developing a * No assurances that AICPA funds will not be
Self-Funded needed in future to cover revenue shortfalls
Financial * Ability to self-support is questionable
Structure * There is no hard evidence that market will
accept the new credential
* Risk of failure jeopardizes the financial future
of the AICPA
THE ISSUES WHAT ADVOCATES SAYS
Creating a NEW * This is a long-term strategy and to
Credential ensure we are first to market we must start now
* Most CPAs have created successful personal
brands, but the CPA brand is largely viewed as
attest and tax
* License restricts ability to stretch CPA brand
to cover all services individual CPAs provide
* CPA/global business credential would signify
depth of knowledge in finance plus breadth of
knowledge across a broad range of disciplines
* Market has been too slow to recognize true scope
of profession's services; 85% of CPAs don't do
audits
* CPAs remain premier financial expert; research
suggests credential helps emphasize strategic
skills
* The proposed credential carries the risk, while
CPA brand stays protected and intact
* The credential infrastructure would accommodate
compressed schedules of today's professionals
* Credential holders would be members of new,
separate institute and not of the AICPA
* AICPA will continue to support CPA brand;
new global institute would support new credential
* MBA quality differs based on university, does
not require work experience or mandate CPA values
Admitting Other * Competition already exists outside core services
Professions * CPAs set the rules by which all credential
holders must abide (ethics, lifelong learning,
etc.)
* Credential is not a rebranding of the CPA; it
defines a larger professional services footprint
* Admission exam to be as psychometrically
stringent as the CPA exam, but not focused on A&A
* Creates unprecedented worldwide knowledge
resource and networking opportunities, which may
not be otherwise available to smaller firms
* Preempts non-CPAs from creating new hurdles for
CPAs and taking lead in strategic knowledge area
Spending * Development funds less than 2% of AICPA budget
Member Dues * More CPAs are interested in credential than in
any other AICPA accreditation now offered
* AICPA ad dollars for CPA at all-time high, with
$25 million for new recruiting program; R&D funds
needed to build opportunities for tomorrow's CPAs
* Research shows credential could significantly
increase the number of students attracted to the
CPA profession
* Credential will be self-funded soon after launch
and AICPA will have no ongoing obligations
Developing an * Market demands strategists who can apply
Interdisciplinary knowledge from multiple disciplines
Framework * Candidates don't have to know it all, but need
an effective knowledge of other disciplines
Developing a * Global institute is designed to be self-funded
Self-Funded soon after launch; AICPA not obliged to cover
Financial shortfalls
Structure * Strategic alliances/member fees will finance
growth
* Market data indicates businesses would pay
premium to credential holders
* Once created, the new Global institute would
assume funding responsibility and all financial
risks
COPYRIGHT 2001 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion