A question of profit; Mailbag letters also appear online at www.examiner.co.uk/views-and-blogs/reader-letters Mailbag.
This framework has been discussed, debated and amended for the last three years. It's time it was settled. Now would be better than June.
I can understand Mr Armer's objections because he is repeating the party line that public is bad, private is good and all public employees are superfluous to requirements.
However, Mr Woolley is being nave if he thinks the proposed abolition of the Regional Spatial Strategy will save the Green Belt.
It's not really about Kirklees at all. The only reason for its abolition is that major donors to the current government's party coffers want to build thousands of houses in locations (especially the South East) where they can make the most profit.
That's on Green Belt land, Mr Woolley.
MARKHAM WEAVILL Linthwaite
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Huddersfield, England)|
|Article Type:||Letter to the editor|
|Date:||Feb 9, 2012|
|Previous Article:||We need more time; Mailbag letters also appear online at www.examiner.co.uk/views-and-blogs/reader-letters Mailbag.|
|Next Article:||Why the big rush to get LDF plan out? Mailbag letters also appear online at www.examiner.co.uk/views-and-blogs/reader-letters Mailbag.|