A piece of the action: Senate beefs up charity poker rules.The New Hampshire Senate The New Hampshire Senate has been meeting since 1784. It is the upper house of the New Hampshire General Court. It consists of 24 members representing Senate districts based on population. Currently, there are 14 Democrats and 10 Republicans in the Senate. has passed a bill that would for the first time put teeth into state roles regulating "charitable" games of chance, including Texas Hold'em poker tournaments A poker tournament is a tournament in which the winners are decided by playing poker, usually a particular style of poker. Contrast this to a ring game, where the game is ongoing with no formal structure to determine a single winner in a certain length of time. . The slate will be cashing in on an industry that's estimated at some $50 million to $100 million in New Hampshire New Hampshire, one of the New England states of the NE United States. It is bordered by Massachusetts (S), Vermont, with the Connecticut R. forming the boundary (W), the Canadian province of Quebec (NW), and Maine and a short strip of the Atlantic Ocean (E). , according to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Sen. Bob Odell Bob Odell (born March 5, 1922) was an American football player. He was elected to the College Football Hall of Fame in 1992. , R-Lempster, who chairs the Senate Ways and Means WAYS AND MEANS. In legislative assemblies there is usually appointed a committee whose duties are to inquire into, and propose to the house, the ways and means to be adopted to raise funds for the use of the government. This body is called the committee of ways and means. Committee. Under the measure, the state would receive 125 percent of the action, charities would be guaranteed about 8.75 percent. The rest would go to the winners and those running the games. Under current regulations, charities are supposed to get 35 percent of the take after profits, but it is unclear what percentage they actually receive because in the murky world of this exploding industry, fees, expenses and profits often are mixed up. House Bill 229 is the first major legislative response to this new industry. The House passed a bill that would leave things as they are, for the most part The biggest change would have the state Pari-Mutuel Commission--which just put bingo bingo Game of chance played with cards having a grid of numbered squares corresponding to numbered balls drawn at random. When a number on the card is drawn, the players cover that number (should they have it); the game is won by covering a certain number of squares in a row and Lucky 7 games under its gambling umbrella--oversee the games. Under the Senate bill, when players buy chips and gamble as in any casino, the 35 percent limit remains--but only of the take, or house winnings--though the minimum bet has gone up from $2 to $5. But much of the money these days is made in tournaments, in which players pay hundreds of dollars to get a shot at a huge pot. In these tournaments, charities would get 6 percent of the first $25,000 of all funds collected from players--not just on the house winnings--and 8.75 percent of all funds exceeding $25,000. The slate would get 1.25 percent of the entire take. The bill also increases bonding requirements five-fold, to $1000,000. It also allows charities to add five more games to the 10-game limit so that they can increase their take to $50,000. Odell estimated that the slate would get some $50,000 to $1 million in revenue, because he estimated that some $50 million to $100 million is now being spent on such tournaments. The House now has to agree to the Senate amendment, or more likely, set up a committee of conference and see if a compromise can be worked out. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion