Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,638,028 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

A bill that protects rights: Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) has introduced legislation to restore the Constitution's checks and balances and to bolster the protection of our liberties.


On October 15, 2007, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) introduced H.R. 3835, the American Freedom Agenda The American Freedom Agenda (AFA) is an American organization, established in March 2007, which represents disaffected conservatives who are demanding that the Republican Party return to its traditional mistrust of concentrated government power.  Act of 2007. Dr. Paul announced that he was "introducing a comprehensive piece of legislation to restore the American Constitution and to restore the liberties that have been sadly eroded over the past several years." This legislation, he noted, "seeks to restore the checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution by our Founding Fathers to prevent abuse of Americans by their government. This proposed legislation would repeal the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and re-establish the traditional practice that military commissions may be used to try war crimes in places of active hostility where a rapid trial is necessary, to preserve evidence or prevent chaos."

Among other things, noted Dr. Paul, H.R. 3835 "clarifies that no information shall be admitted as evidence if it is obtained from the defendant through the use of torture or coercion." It also prohibits "kidnapping and extraordinary rendition Extraordinary rendition and irregular rendition are terms used to describe the extrajudicial transfer of a person from one state to another, and the term Torture by proxy  of prisoners to foreign countries on the president's unilateral determination" that the suspect is an enemy combatant Captured fighter in a war who is not entitled to prisoner of war status because he or she does not meet the definition of a lawful combatant as established by the geneva convention; a saboteur.

The U.S.
. And, says Rep. Paul, it defends the First Amendment by clarifying that journalists are not to be prevented from publishing information received from the legislative or executive branch unless such publication would cause immediate, direct, and irreparable harm to the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. .

Unlike much legislation, which frequently runs to dozens (or even hundreds) of pages, Dr. Paul's legislation is the model of brevity--fewer than 900 words. Because of its timely importance and conciseness, THE NEW AMERICAN is raking the unusual step of reproducing below the entire verbatim text of the American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007.

110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION

H.R. 3835

To restore the Constitution's checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 15, 2007

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary may mean:
  • United States House Committee on the Judiciary
  • United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services The Constitution authorizes Congress to raise, support, and regulate armed services for the national defense. The President of the United States is commander in chief of all the branches of the services and has ultimate control over most military matters. , Foreign Affairs, and Select Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To restore the Constitution's checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The name of this country. The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire,  in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the "American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007."

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) FINDINGS--Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Unchecked power by any branch leads to oppressive transgressions on individual freedoms and ill-considered government policies.

(2) The Founding Fathers enshrined checks and balances in the Constitution to protect against government abuses to derail de·rail  
intr. & tr.v. de·railed, de·rail·ing, de·rails
1. To run or cause to run off the rails.

2.
 ill-conceived domestic or foreign endeavors.

(3) Checks and balances make the Nation safer by preventing abuses that would be exploited by A1 Qaeda to boost terrorist recruitment, would deter foreign governments from cooperating in defeating international terrorism, and would make the American people reluctant to support aggressive counter-terrorism measures.

(4) Checks and balances have withered since 9/11 and an alarming concentration of power has been accumulated in the presidency based on hyper-inflated fears of international terrorism and a desire permanently to alter the equilibrium of power between the three branches of government.

(5) The unprecedented constitutional powers claimed by the President since 9/11 subtracted national security and have been asserted for non-national security purposes.

(6) Experience demonstrates that global terrorism can be thwarted, deterred, and punished through muscular application of law enforcement measures and prosecutions in Federal civilian courts in lieu of military commissions or military law.

(7) Congressional oversight of the executive branch is necessary to prevent secret government, which undermines self-government and invites lawlessness and maladministration mal·ad·min·is·ter  
tr.v. mal·ad·min·is·tered, mal·ad·min·is·ter·ing, mal·ad·min·is·ters
To administer or manage inefficiently or dishonestly.



mal
.

(8) The post-9/11 challenges to checks and balances are unique in the Nation's history because the war on global terrorism has no discernible end.

(b) PURPOSE--The American Freedom Agenda Act of 2007 is intended to restore the Constitution's checks and balances and protections against government abuses as envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

SEC. 3. MILITARY COMMISSIONS; ENEMY COMBATANTS; HABEAS CORPUS habeas corpus (hā`bēəs kôr`pəs) [Lat.,=you should have the body], writ directed by a judge to some person who is detaining another, commanding him to bring the body of the person in his custody at a specified time to a .

(a) The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is hereby repealed.

(b) The President is authorized to establish military commissions for the trial of war crimes only in places of active hostilities against the United States where an immediate trial is necessary to preserve fresh evidence or to prevent local anarchy.

(c) The President is prohibited from detaining any individual indefinitely as an unlawful enemy combatant An unlawful enemy combatant is a person detained by United States in its war on terror. Differing terminology
The term "enemy combatant" was used by the Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants, the body that administers Guantanamo captives'
 absent proof by substantial evidence that the individual has directly engaged in active hostilities against the United States, provided that no United States citizen shall be detained as an unlawful enemy combatant.

(d) Any individual detained as an enemy combatant by the United States shall be entitled to petition for a writ of habeas corpus Noun 1. writ of habeas corpus - a writ ordering a prisoner to be brought before a judge
habeas corpus

judicial writ, writ - (law) a legal document issued by a court or judicial officer
 under section 2241 of title 28, United States Code Noun 1. United States Code - a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States; is prepared and published by a unit of the United States House of Representatives
U. S.
.

SEC. 4. TORTURE OR COERCED CONFESSIONS.

No civilian or military tribunal of the United States shall admit as evidence statements extracted from the defendant by torture or coercion.

SEC. 5. INTELLIGENCE GATHERING.

No Federal agency shall gather foreign intelligence in contravention A term of French law meaning an act violative of a law, a treaty, or an agreement made between parties; a breach of law punishable by a fine of fifteen francs or less and by an imprisonment of three days or less. In the U.S.  of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq et seq. (et seek) n. abbreviation for the Latin phrase et sequentes meaning "and the following." It is commonly used by lawyers to include numbered lists, pages or sections after the first number is stated, as in "the rules of the road are found in Vehicle Code .). The President's constitutional power to gather foreign intelligence is subordinated to this provision.

SEC. 6. PRESIDENTIAL SIGNING STATEMENTS.

The House of Representatives and Senate collectively shall enjoy standing to file a declaratory judgment declaratory judgment

In law, a judgment merely declaring a right or establishing the legal status or interpretation of a law or instrument. It is binding but is distinguished from other judgments or court opinions in that it includes no executive element (an order that
 action in an appropriate Federal district court to challenge the constitutionality of a presidential signing statement that declares the President's intent to disregard provisions of a bill he has signed into law because he believes they are unconstitutional.

SEC. 7. KIDNAPPING, DETENTIONS, AND TORTURE ABROAD.

No officer or agent of the United States shall kidnap, imprison im·pris·on  
tr.v. im·pris·oned, im·pris·on·ing, im·pris·ons
To put in or as if in prison; confine.



[Middle English emprisonen, from Old French emprisoner : en-
, or torture any person abroad based solely on the President's belief that the subject of the kidnapping, imprisonment Imprisonment
See also Isolation.

Alcatraz Island

former federal maximum security penitentiary, near San Francisco; “escapeproof.” [Am. Hist.: Flexner, 218]

Altmark, the

German prison ship in World War II. [Br. Hist.
, or torture is a criminal or enemy combatant; provided that kidnapping shall be permitted if undertaken with the intent of bringing the kidnapped person for prosecution or interrogation interrogation

In criminal law, process of formally and systematically questioning a suspect in order to elicit incriminating responses. The process is largely outside the governance of law, though in the U.S.
 to gather intelligence before a tribunal that meets international standards of fairness and due process. A knowing violation of this section shall be punished as a felony punishable by a fine or imprisonment of tip to 2 years.

SEC. 8. JOURNALIST EXCEPTION TO ESPIONAGE ACT.

Nothing in the Espionage Act of 1917 shall prohibit a journalist from publishing information received from the executive branch or Congress unless the publication would cause direct, immediate, and irreparable harm to the national security of the United States.

SEC. 9. USE OF SECRET EVIDENCE TO MAKE FOREIGN TERRORIST DESIGNATIONS.

Notwithstanding any other law, secret evidence shall not be used by the President or any other member of the executive branch to designate an individual or organization with a United States presence as a foreign terrorist or foreign terrorist organization for purposes of the criminal law or otherwise imposing criminal or civil sanctions.
COPYRIGHT 2007 American Opinion Publishing, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:CONSTITUTION
Author:Jasper, William F.
Publication:The New American
Date:Nov 12, 2007
Words:1163
Previous Article:What's left of the Bill of Rights?
Next Article:The economics of climate change: fears of global warming have spurred calls for the regulation of carbon emissions. If such regulations are put in...



Related Articles
Bush moves to tighten product safety rules.(Wire Washington)(The White House and the FDA propose better enforcement, but put no price tag on the...
Questioning immigration status when students enroll.
Restoring rights: Rep. Ron Paul introduces legislation to protect basic rights like habeas corpus, to prohibit torture, and to ban arbitrary...
What's left of the Bill of Rights?
ENDA, state by state.(Forward)
A conversation with Jeffrey Toobin: the media world's favorite legal mind recently published a fascinating book on the Supreme Court. What's in it...
Republican matters: while many have hailed the Democrats' courtship of LGBT voters as one giant leap for gaykind, perhaps the movement's future...
Federal bill would offer incentives to work in states: legislation would allow write-off for first $15 million in costs.(PRODUCTION)
Getting Beyond Roe.(Letters)(Letter to the editor)
Marriage maneuver: Florida 'Family Impact Summit' gives gays the devil, as religious right rallies grassroots troops for 2008.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles