Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,467,392 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

A Government Plan for Enforcing Immigration Laws - Blocked by a Federal Court - Now Leaves Small Businesses with Many Questions, Says NAPEO.


ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- A federal judge temporarily blocked the Department of Homeland Security's plan to crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants, but a prominent labor lawyer says small businesses aren't out of the woods yet.

Every year the Social Security Administration sends businesses "no-match" letters when there's a discrepancy between employees' names and their social security numbers. Employers can then ensure the social security taxes employees pay are being credited to the right person.

But Homeland Security wanted employers to use the letters to ferret out illegal workers, although as part of the plan it gave businesses three months and a set of rules to clear up the discrepancy - guidance they hadn't had before.

The court's ruling leaves employers in the same murky situation that the new rules tried to clear up, says an immigration lawyer.

"The court's ruling is not necessarily a victory for employers," said Sean G. Hanagan, a partner at the law firm Jackson Lewis LLP. "There is a real need to clarify an employer's obligations when they receive a 'no-match' letter, and these proposed rules were the government's first attempt. The Social Security Administration will continue to send 'no-match' letters, and without clarifying the rules, the huge uncertainty over how to deal with them stands unresolved."

In the past, the government has used a business' flagrant disregard of the letters as proof that the business knew, or should have known, that its employees were illegal immigrants.

The court's ruling today was a victory for civil rights groups, unions and business, which contended that Homeland Security was putting too heavy a regulatory load on employers.

"These letters were created to help employees, but the government wanted to use them to put small businesses squarely in the middle over illegal immigration, creating a huge burden," said Milan P. Yager, executive vice president of the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations, or NAPEO. "Congress failed to act on immigration last summer, and now it needs to take up the issue again and make clear rules businesses can live with - or small businesses, their workers and the entire economy will continue to be at risk."

The Jackson Lewis law firm specializes in labor law and is a member of NAPEO (www.napeo.org), the trade association for companies that do human-resource chores for small businesses, such as helping them comply with immigration laws.

To ask Mr. Hanagan what small businesses should do now, call NAPEO public relations to arrange an interview.

COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Oct 11, 2007
Words:412
Previous Article:ELEMENT Hotels: Travelers to Rise, Shine and Thrive in Orlando, Fl.
Next Article:Physicians Adult Daycare Comments on Study That Shows Adult Daycare May Help Reduce Onset of Alzheimer's.
Topics:



Related Articles
`NIGHTMARE' FOR WORKERS ACTIVISTS CLAIM ELIGIBILITY CHECKS WILL AFFECT MORE THAN IMMIGRANTS.(News)
ALL ENDS WELL after HIV, breast-feeding dispute.(City/Region Columnist)
A question of survival.(Editorials)(Study: Hatchery steelhead weaker than wild runs)(Editorial)
Raise your hand if you care about reauthorization.(FEDERAL DATELINE)
John Edwards vs. the lobbyists: a presidential candidate promises to clean up Washington--by trashing the First Amendment.(Columns)
Owning your business ... owning your property.(FINANCIAL PLANNING)
FIREFIGHTER'S WIDOW FOCUSES LIGHT ON PLIGHT.(News)
Electronic attackers: computer crimes keep government and industry on the defensive.(CYBER WARFARE)
Border enforcement.(IMMIGRATION STUDY BRIEF # 3)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles