4th annual best sapper competition.From 6 through 8 May, the best sappers from across the Regiment converged at Fort Leonard Wood Fort Leonard Wood, U.S. army post, 71,000 acres (28,700 hectares), S central Mo.; est. 1940. It is one of the largest basic-training centers in the United States and also provides training for army engineers. for the 4th Annual Best Sapper Competition. Hosted by the 577th Engineer Battalion and Sapper Leader Course personnel--and sponsored by the Engineer Regiment--the competition gave engineer units across the Army the opportunity to showcase their best Soldiers. The six-phase competition was to determine the best of the best. The Soldiers who stood out here are the best in their units, the best in the Regiment, and some of the best in the Army. Best Sapper 2008 This year's competition, which was attended by 25 teams from 19 units across the Army, included ranks from private first class through major. The six major events were-- * Phase I: Nonstandard non·stan·dard adj. 1. Varying from or not adhering to the standard: nonstandard lengths of board. 2. Physical Fitness Test (NSPFT) * Phase II: Round-Robin * Phase III Noun 1. phase III - a large clinical trial of a treatment or drug that in phase I and phase II has been shown to be efficacious with tolerable side effects; after successful conclusion of these clinical trials it will receive formal approval from the FDA : X-Mile Road March * Phase IV: Sapper Stakes * Phase V: Land Navigation * Phase VI: X-Mile Run Day One [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Phase I--the NSPFT--set the tone for the rest of the competition, determining who was ready and who wasn't. The NSPFT consisted of 5 minutes of push-ups, 5 minutes of situps, and 3 minutes of pullups. Only one member of a two-man team could perform each exercise at a time, but team members could switch throughout the designated time period. The intent was to throw a little strategy into the test. This made the teams think a little more about the event as it progressed. It also added an extra edge of competitiveness to the event. The NSPFT ended with a 3-mile run in interceptor body armor Noun 1. body armor - armor that protects the wearer's whole body body armour, cataphract, coat of mail, suit of armor, suit of armour armet - a medieval helmet with a visor and a neck guard (IBA) and small arms small arms, firearms designed primarily to be carried and fired by one person and, generally, held in the hands, as distinguished from heavy arms, or artillery. Early Small Arms The first small arms came into general use at the end of the 14th cent. protective insert (SAPI (Speech API) A programming interface from Microsoft for speech recognition and synthesis. It provides a way for developers to enable their applications to receive text from and send text to voice devices. 1. ) plates. After the NSPFT, competitors moved to Phase II--the Round-Robin--with the first subevent being a 150-meter swim with a poncho raft. As the 24 teams exited the water from the poncho raft swim (1 team had dropped out due to an injury), competitors were loaded on trucks again and sent to six different sites on Fort Leonard Wood to continue the event. The additional subevents for the Round-Robin included the stress shoot, grenade range, timber-cutting charge, counterforce charge, military operations This is a list of missions, operations, and projects. Missions in support of other missions are not listed independently. World War I ''See also List of military engagements of World War I
MOUT Managed Object Under Test ) breach, and urban challenge. The urban challenge, a new subevent this year, tested competitors' ability to shoot, move, and communicate through a simulated Iraqi village that consisted of realistic battle sounds, opposing forces (OPFOR OPFOR Opposing Force OPFOR Operating Force (US DoD) ) in traditional clothing, artillery simulators, and burn barrels, as well as live animals. Scoring for the individual events was designed so that no one event could outweigh any other. That was done so a team wouldn't completely knock themselves out of the competition by doing poorly at one event. The idea was to look at the total Soldier, the most well-rounded sappers. Day Two At 0200, the 24 teams began Phase III--the X-Mile Road March. Designated the "X-Mile" because competitors were not told the total distance, the road march served as another hurdle in the competition to set the best sappers apart from their competitors. By the end of the road march, 5 teams had dropped from contention. At 0730, the remaining 19 teams loaded trucks for their dropoff at the Sapper Stakes (Phase IV) events, which would add 5 more miles to the 16 the teams had already covered. The subevents that made up Sapper Stakes were the weapons assembly, foreign mine identification and improvised explosive device Noun 1. improvised explosive device - an explosive device that is improvised I.E.D., IED explosive device - device that bursts with sudden violence from internal energy (IED Noun 1. IED - an explosive device that is improvised I.E.D., improvised explosive device explosive device - device that bursts with sudden violence from internal energy ) report, combat lifesaver (CLS (Common Language Specification) The structure and syntax of .NET and CLI programming languages. See .NET. ) techniques, inert steel cutting, knot tying, Prusik A Prusik (aka Prussik or Prussic) is a friction hitch used in climbing, canyoneering, mountaineering, caving, rope rescue and by arborists to grab a rope (sometimes referred to as a rope-grab). climb and buddy rappel, mine detectors, and the obstacle course and physical endurance course (PEC). Throughout Sapper Stakes, teams moved on foot to each event to total 5 miles. The biggest subevent of the phase is the Prusik climb and buddy rappel. However, due to safety concerns caused by lightning, this subevent--as well as the obstacle course and PEC course--had to be removed from the competition. With heavy lightning in the area, it was too risky for Soldiers to conduct rappels on the 45-foor Sapper Tower. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] At 2100, the remaining 18 teams began Phase V--the Land Navigation Course. The event added another 6 miles to the 21 miles the teams had already covered and took them right up to 1 hour before the X-Mile Run of Day Three. By the completion of the land navigation course, another team had dropped out. Day Three Phase VI of the competition was the X-Mile Run, and only the top 10 teams advanced to this phase. Before starting the run, the competitors were unaware of the total distance or the mystery events on the route. The mystery events this year included carrying items weighing up to 110 pounds for various portions of the 9-mile run. By the completion of the event, the teams would have covered a total of 32 miles during the competition. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Best Sapper 2009 Overall, the three-day event three-day event a competition in the pleasure horse sport comprising usually one day each for dressage, cross country and show jumping. set the standard for the Best Sapper competitions in the future. This year's competition was considered to be the best one yet; and since it was tied in with ENFORCE, it had a lot more visibility than it had in the past. The 2009 competition is expected to be even better. The Sapper Leader Course cadre are already assessing the 2008 competition and beginning to plan for next year. Although they expect to use some of the same types of events in 2009, they will definitely make some changes to continue to challenge the competitors. The cadre encourage teams to begin preparing now and register as early as possible to make the cut for next year's competition. First Lieutenant Butler is the executive officer of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 577th Engineer Battalion, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. Commissioned through the Army Reserve Officer Training Corps, he is a graduate of the Sapper Leader Course at Fort Leonard Wood and the Ranger School at Fort Benning, Georgia.
2008 Best Sapper Competition Teams
2LT Jonathan Browning 20th Engineer Battalion
SGT Jack Ramthun Fort Hood, Texas
SGT Alexander Mack 20th Engineer Battalion
SGT Glenn Taylor Fort Hood, Texas
SGT Justin Gaiser 20th Engineer Battalion
SPC Patrick Hernandez Fort Hood, Texas
1LT Douglas Droesch 1st Engineer Battalion
1LT Kyle Metzger Fort Riley, Kansas
SSG Karen Antonyan 911th Engineer Company
SGT Matthew Rowsey Fort Belvoir, Virginia
1LT Scott Sann U.S. Army Dive Company
SSG Travis Kaufman Fort Eustis, Virginia
CPT Jason Winkelmann 8th Engineer Battalion
2LT Joel Groves Fort Hood, Texas
SGT Rory Leslie 37th Engineer Battalion
SGT Kurt Nuhfer Fort Bragg, North Carolina
1LT Scott Eshom 502d Engineer Company
1LT Nicholas Soroka Hanau, Germany
1LT Nicholas Fox 11th Engineer Company
1LT Kyle Moore Fort Riley, Kansas
2LT Zachary Taron 3d Brigade Special Troops Battalion
1LT Matthew Davis Schofield Barracks, Hawaii
CPT Christopher George 554th Engineer Battalion
CPT Josh Eggar Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
MAJ Stephen Peterson 1st Engineer Brigade
CPT Daniel Taphorn Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
SSG Michael Daley 562d Engineer Company
PFC Ryan Morison Fort Lewis, Washington
1LT Christopher Clare 4th Engineer Battalion
1LT Tyrel Keplinger Fort Carson, Colorado
1LT Kristopher Valenti 4th Engineer Battalion
PFC James Conley Fort Carson, Colorado
1LT Brian Burch 511th Engineer Company
2LT Richard Miller Fort Campbell, Kentucky
1LT Matthew Textor 65th Engineer Battalion
SGT Dustin Hughes Schofield Barracks, Hawaii
SFC Michael Behnkendorf 20th Engineer Brigade
1LT Shawn Hogan Fort Bragg, North Carolina
SSG Timothy Knight 2-8 Cavalry Division, 1BCT
SGT Joshua Morgan Fort Hood, Texas
1LT Nathan Magee 562d Engineer Company
2LT Kevin Kirby Fort Lewis, Washington
2LT Chris Williammee 72d Engineer Company
SPC James Wiard Fort Riley, Kansas
1LT Lucas Hansen 72d Engineer Company
SPC Chris Gomez Fort Riley, Kansas
2LT John Davis 562d Engineer Company
SSG Keith Novembre Fort Lewis, Washington
1LT Craig Genung 591st Engineer Company
SGT Justin Claypool Fort Campbell, Kentucky
2008 Best Sapper Competition Winners 2008
First Place CPT Jason Winkelmann 8th Engineer Battalion
2LT Joel Groves Fort Hood, Texas
Second Place SFC Michael Behnkendorf 20th Engineer Brigade
1LT Shawn Hogan Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Third Place MAJ Stephen Peterson 1st Engineer Brigade
CPT Daniel Taphorn Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
|
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion