Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,658,597 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

1NY Plaza to get $33M tax refund.


The owner of one New York Plaza One New York Plaza is an office building in New York City, built in 1969, and is located at the intersection of South and Whitehall Streets (). It is the southernmost of all Manhattan skyscrapers.  will get a property tax refund Tax refund

Money back from the government when too much tax has been paid or withheld from a salary.
 of approximately $33 million now that the Court of Appeals has denied the City of New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
 leave to appeal a lower court decision and a higher court's unanimous confirmation.

"This is the end of the line," said Executive Assistance Corporation Counsel Edith I. Spivack, who argued the appeal for the city last fall.

The three-judge appellate Division In several jurisdictions, the Appellate Division is the name of a court, or division of a court, that hears appeals from lower courts.
  • For the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court, see New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division.
, First Department, in January had upheld the lower court's decision to award One New York Plaza $360.3 million in assessment reductions. There were six tax years in the 1980's under review and later years will be adjusted through the recalculation re·cal·cu·late  
tr.v. re·cal·cu·lat·ed, re·cal·cu·lat·ing, re·cal·cu·lates
To calculate again, especially in order to eliminate errors or to incorporate additional factors or data.
 of transitions.

One New York Plaza has a current actual assessment of $136,350,000 while the transition is a higher $162,014,000. A property pays on the lower amount and it is unclear if the recalculations will be made in time for the July payment.

Joel R. Marcus, currently a tax certiorari certiorari

In law, a writ issued by a superior court for the reexamination of an action of a lower court. The writ of certiorari was originally a writ from England's Court of Queen's (King's) Bench to the judges of an inferior court; it was later expanded to include writs
 partner with Pottish & Freyberg, was one of the trial attorneys when he was a Shea & Gould partner. He agreed with Spivack saying, "They will recognize the decision but they know there is no appeal."

Marcus said the principal of approximately $28 million together with interest could bring the award upwards of $40 million. Most of the refunds will be paid to the tenants and the current owners, Chase Manhattan Bank The Chase Manhattan Bank, now part of JPMorgan Chase, was formed by the merger of the Chase National Bank and the Bank of the Manhattan Company in 1955. The bank is headquartered in New York City. . The building was formerly owned by Sandra Bass. Chase was the tenant for 50 percent of the space and now owns the building.

The case was tried for the city by Mortimer Traktman and Reed Schneider. Spivack handled the appeal.

Marcus, together with Shea & Gould's litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 partner, Adam B. Gilbert and associate Jeffrey T. Wald, tried the case for the owner while the appeal was handled by Shea & Gould partner, Martin I. Shelton, and Gilbert, who were assisted by associate Timothy Burke Timothy Burke (born February 3, 1982 in Paul Smiths, New York) is a U.S. biathlete. At the 2007 World Championships in Antholz, he made history as he finished 7th in the men's 20 km race, the second best ever U.S.  and Marcus.

Between the 83/84 and 84/85 tax years the city increased the assessment by $50 million, Gilbert said, and steadily increased it by another $25 million or together another $166 million in value despite overwhelming evidence that earnings were flat, a "50-layer cake of asbestos" kept tenants away, and the building's function and structure declined.

"The assessor and the city blinded themselves to the obvious fact that this building did not increase in value," Gilbert said. "We are delighted that the judicial system recognized what the rest of the real estate community knows to be implicitly true, namely, that building condition in general, and the presence of asbestos in particular, can have a serious negative impact on value."

Spivack agreed the court based its decision on the defects of the building of which asbestos was only one component.

"We argued that it would cost $140 million to make this a first-class building and that is exactly what has occurred today," said Marcus, referring to the expected $200 million refurbishment of the property which has 1.5 million square feet available for rent through the Edward S. Gordon Company.

"This decision is very significant because there are many buildings that suffer from widespread asbestos fireproofing fireproofing, method of making normally combustible materials as nearly noncombustible as possible. Fireproofing generally applies to textiles and construction materials that are treated with a solution or coating of some substance that will tend to retard their  which has a significant effect on their market value," Marcus said, referring to 55 Broad Street which his office has scheduled for trial in the fall.

Marcus said the city was not realistic in its settlement offers. "The end of the story for most owners," Marcus said, "Is that they don't have to accept an inadequate settlement offer, the court has the last word."
COPYRIGHT 1992 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:One New York Plaza owner awarded $33 million in Court of Appeals decision
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Date:Jun 10, 1992
Words:589
Previous Article:Industry, who speaks for you in Washington? (lobbyists for real estate industry in Washington D.C.)
Next Article:Lefrak: city to recover from 'Decade of Swine.' (developer J. Samuel LeFrak addresses real estate industry conference)
Topics:



Related Articles
Transit officials say ruling won't stop Metro Rail; court invalidates tax to fund rail construction.
Court ruling challenges some Prop. 13 reappraisals; Shuwa claims it is being overtaxed $2 million a year. (Shuwa Investment Corp.)
Shuwa will continue landmark challenge to property tax bill. (Shuwa Investments Corp.)
NYC tax roll closes on May 22, final to be published May 28.
Suspect succession claim held unsuccessful. (appellate court reverses decision placing burden of proof for rent regulated succession rights on family...
Attorneys win tax refund for Ed Sullivan Theater. (certiorari attorneys Podell, Rothman, Schechter and Banfield win property tax rebate for owners of...
421a class recalculation turned down by court. (New York State Court of Appeals denies request to create class of property owners for automatic...
Record tax reduction in Rockland. (property tax)
Final tax roll is released. (New York property tax rates)
Trump suing city for $500 million.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles