Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,573,962 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

'Nose' technology might help identify pathogens faster. (New technology).


Researchers have developed a sensing technology that might allow doctors to detect and identify pathogens in the blood much faster than conventional lab tests can, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the Illinois Institute of Technology Illinois Institute of Technology, in Chicago; coeducational; founded 1940 by a merger of Armour Institute of Technology (founded 1892) and Lewis Institute (1896). . The results of the student-led study at IIT IIT - Integrated Information Technology  were published in the Sept. 30 issue of the Journal of Microbiology.

The sensing device is called an electronic nose. It is an array of small sensors that detect gases given off by microscopic organisms, such as E. coli E. coli: see Escherichia coli.
E. coli
 in full Escherichia coli

Species of bacterium that inhabits the stomach and intestines. E. coli can be transmitted by water, milk, food, or flies and other insects.
 and staphylococcus staphylococcus (stăf'ələkŏk`əs), any of the pathogenic bacteria, parasitic to humans, that belong to the genus Staphylococcus. The spherical bacterial cells (cocci) typically occur in irregular clusters [Gr.  bacteria, which can infect the blood. The sensors are linked to a computer that analyzes the gas signature and compares it to signatures from known pathogens. Current laboratory methods take up to 48 hours to identify pathogens in the blood. IIT says the electronic nose can cut the time to 24 hours.

Electronic noses are arrays of sensors that sense microscopic particles, much like the receptors inside the human nose. Electronic noses that can identify the presence of the tuberculosis bacteria are also in development. The e-nose was developed in response to lab technicians at Provident Hospital of Cook County in Chicago who noticed that when testing blood for pathogens, there would often be certain odors that were strongly linked to the type of pathogen they would find.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Nelson Publishing
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Medical Laboratory Observer
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2001
Words:209
Previous Article:TriPath earns FDA nod for AutoCyte Prep system screening. (Industry Watch).
Next Article:Clinical suspicion of TB provides important testing information. (Disease watch).
Topics:



Related Articles
Identifying Dangerous Pathogens.
Random Samples.
Food Pathogen Lab Network Hailed a Success.
Market profile: electronic noses.
Latest changes to HIPAA still have problems; complying with OSHA needlestick directive. (Washington Report).
How do labs report bioterrorism agents? (Liability and the Lab).
New technologies against food pathogens.
Advances in food diagnostics.
Magnetic nanoparticles detect, remove bacteria.
Technology user live cells to detect foodborne pathogens, toxins.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles