'Misguided notions of racial loyalty' should be cast aside.I'LL be honest. I have trouble seeing Robert Kelly There are severable notable individuals named Robert Kelly:
The singer, professionally known as R. Kelly, stands accused by Chicago authorities of child pornography Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest. , the chief evidence of which is videotape that allegedly shows him having sex with an underage girl. Similar charges in Florida were tossed last month on a technicality. So, while Kelly is certainly entitled to the legal presumption of innocence A principle that requires the government to prove the guilt of a criminal defendant and relieves the defendant of any burden to prove his or her innocence. The presumption of innocence, an ancient tenet of Criminal Law, is actually a misnomer. According to the U.S. , he hardly seems like a fellow who should be greeted with trophies and applause, both of which he received during the recently televised Soul Train Music Awards The Soul Train Music Awards is an annual award show aired in national syndication that honors the best in Black music and entertainment. It is produced by the producers of Soul Train, the program from which it takes its name. . Indeed, Kelly's legal troubles over the last two years have barely slowed his career. His music continues to rack up multi-platinum sales, and in January he was nominated for, of all things, an NAACP NAACP in full National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Oldest and largest U.S. civil rights organization. It was founded in 1909 to secure political, educational, social, and economic equality for African Americans; W.E.B. Du Bois and Ida B. Image Award. It's emblematic em·blem·at·ic or em·blem·at·i·cal adj. Of, relating to, or serving as an emblem; symbolic. [French emblématique, from Medieval Latin embl of something that makes me sad and, paradoxically, proud. I refer to the way the black community circles the wagons when one of our own is in trouble. The impulse isn't that difficult to understand. Our history has taught us to be suspicious of "justice" and expectant of unfairness. It has made each of us a mirror for the difficulties of the other. So one of us in trouble becomes all of us in trouble. Unfortunately, we are often indiscriminate in this unity, expending energy and political capital regardless of who is in trouble or why. Regardless of anything, except that he or she is black. And here, I'm thinking of Tawana Brawley, who some of us supported even after her claim of abuse at the hands of white men had been discredited. I'm thinking of O.J. Simpson, whose case became a black "cause" even though he cut his visible ties to the black community years before his arrest. I'm thinking of Jermaine Jackson
Jermaine LaJaune Jackson or Muhammad Abdul Aziz[1] , crying "racism" on behalf of his brother Michael. And never mind that Mike has undertaken to scrape every last trace of black--and man--from his face. And yes, I'm thinking of Kelly, who stood on the Soul Train stage mouthing platitudes about God while the audience showered him with supportive applause. I understand supporting a favorite performer when be or she is in trouble. I also understand being so bound by misguided notions of racial loyalty that one supports without thinking, supports past the point when conscience and common sense would suggest otherwise. It makes us seem ... predictable. And reflexive. We--blacks--ought to be more thoughtful about who we choose to rally around, ought to be less automatic in leaping to the defense. Yes, we are forgiving people in a forgiving nation. But we need to grow beyond the notion that someone deserves our support because he is black and in trouble. We've spent 400 years trying to get white people to understand that black is not a flaw. Sometimes, though, we ourselves forget: It's not a character reference, either. Leonard Pitts Lenard Pitts is a nationally-syndicated columnist and winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary. He was originally hired by the Miami Herald to critique music, but within a few years he received his own column in which he dealt extensively with race, politics, and culture. is a columnist for the Miami Herald. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion