Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,573,962 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

'Future combat systems' under cloud of uncertainty.


Despite high-level endorsements from the Army's top leadership, "future combat systems" may never become the $180 billion procurement The fancy word for "purchasing." The procurement department within an organization manages all the major purchases.  program that was originally envisioned. As recent comments by Army and industry officials suggest, FCS FCS - Frame Check Sequence  more likely will be an amalgamation amalgamation /amal·ga·ma·tion/ (ah-mal´gah-ma´shun) trituration (3).
amalgamation (
 of dozens of technologies that the Army will gradually decide to buy or abandon. Insiders say the Army is even considering changing the program's name.

"We are not waiting for a magical moment when this new thing arrives," says Lt. Gen. David F. Melcher, Army deputy chief of staff for force development, in response to questions about FCS during an industry conference.

The cost of the war in Iraq and expectations of tightening defense spending raise huge questions about the future of FCS, industry experts say. "For the near-term, the Army cannot afford wholesale change but can afford incremental Additional or increased growth, bulk, quantity, number, or value; enlarged.

Incremental cost is additional or increased cost of an item or service apart from its actual cost.
 improvements," predicts Michael L. Schany of General Dynamics General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE: GD) is a defense conglomerate formed by mergers and divestitures, and as of 2006 it is the sixth largest defense contractor in the world[1]. The company has changed markedly in the post-Cold War era of defense consolidation.  Land Systems, in a forecast report published by the Government Electronics & Information Technology Association.

Email your comments to Editor@ndia.org
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Defense Industrial Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:WASHINGTON PULSE
Publication:National Defense
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2006
Words:167
Previous Article:Military networks are Pentagon's 'Achilles' heel'.
Next Article:Nuclear meltdown: Homeland Security tussles with GAO over radiation portals.
Topics:



Related Articles
Atomic Crowds Tied by Quantum Thread.
Future Tactical Truck to expedite transportation: Army garnering support for what could be a $3 billion vehicle program by 2006.
Vibrating foil improves paper properties.
Media blamed for Pentagon 'groupthink'.
American forces press service (Feb. 7, 2005): budget emphasizes present, future warfighting capabilities.
Molecular anatomy revealed: CT scans for molecules show the gauzy nature of matter.
Future Combat Systems to hit a few bumps.
Shine on, deadly light.
First teleportation between light and matter.
'Future Combat Systems' too hard to grasp.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles