Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,573,962 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

`Eruv' Isn't Required In New Jersey, Federal Court Rules.


A New Jersey community can deny Orthodox Jews use of public utility poles A utility pole, telegraph pole, telephone pole, power pole, or telegraph post is a post or pole upon which telecommunication network equipment is situated.  and street signs to post religious symbols, a federal court has ruled.

On Aug. 9, U.S. District Court Judge William G. Bassler William G. Bassler (born 1938) is a former judge on the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, serving from 1991 until 2006. He is currently an adjunct professor at Seton Hall Law School[1] and Rutgers Law School[2]  ruled that the Tenafly Borough Council could legally restrict Orthodox Jews from using public property to erect an "eruv
This article discusses the eruv for carrying. For other types of eruv, see Eruv (disambiguation).


Eruv (Hebrew: עירוב‎, also spelt Eiruv or
" (religious boundary) around the community.

An eruv incorporates homes into a larger territory, allowing observant ob·ser·vant  
adj.
1. Quick to perceive or apprehend; alert: an observant traveler. See Synonyms at careful.

2.
 Orthodox Jews to partake in Verb 1. partake in - be active in
participate, take part - share in something

2. partake in - have, give, or receive a share of; "We shared the cake"
partake, share
 activities outside their homes that would ordinarily be prohibited on the Jewish Sabbath, such as pushing a baby stroller. The eruv is constructed by tying markers to community poles such as light posts, letting other Jews in the community know where the boundary's limits are.

The Tenafly Borough Council voted 5-0 to remove the eruv from public property, prompting the Tenafly Eruv Association to file suit in federal court. Local government officials argued that permitting utility poles to be permanently used for a religious purpose would violate the constitutional principle of church-state separation. Bassler agreed.

"Since the Borough Council's decision was narrowly tailored to prohibit only conduct that might generate the appearance of an entanglement between church and state, no constitutional infirmities resulted, and there is no cause for a court to second guess such a decision," Bassler ruled in Tenafly Eruv Association v. Borough of Tenafly.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Church & State
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NJ
Date:Oct 1, 2001
Words:222
Previous Article:Georgia Biology Text Passes Test At State Appeals Court.
Next Article:Illinois Governor Approves Islamic Food Law.
Topics:



Related Articles
The Supreme Court's new rule on amicus briefs.
SECTION 8 PROGRAM RULED MANDATORY IN NEW JERSEY.
TEI tells Supreme Court ... revenue rulings are mere litigating positions and not entitled to deference.
Was it something we said? The government's defensive reply to TEI's amicus brief in Mead strikes a nerve.
Courts issue conflicting decisions in public-entity cases against gun industry.
JUSTICES EASE RULE ON SETTING TOP PRICES; HIGH COURT OVERTURNS ANTITRUST RESTRICTIONS.
Online research strategies for the bookish lawyer: lawyers with more legal than technical know-how can still use the many computer tools available to...
Misidentification noted.
HIGH COURT VOIDS AQMD RULE ALTERNATIVE-FUEL REQUIREMENT FOR VEHICLE FLEETS STRUCK DOWN.
When a win may not mean much.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles