[2] Ortec Extends Expiration Date of Class B Warrants; Potential Achievement of Near Term Milestones Cited as Reason for Extension.NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 17, 1999-- Ortec International, Inc. (NASDAQ NASDAQ in full National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations U.S. market for over-the-counter securities. Established in 1971 by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), NASDAQ is an automated quotation system that reports on : ORTC ORTC Old Republic Title Company ORTC Operational Readiness Training Complex ) announced the extension of the expiration date Expiration Date The day on which an options or futures contract is no longer valid and, therefore, ceases to exist. Notes: The expiration date for all listed stock options in the U.S. of its Class B warrants (NASDAQ: ORTCZ) to January 31, 2000. The warrants currently have a $15 exercise price and were set to expire on November 30, 1999. The company has the right to reduce the price of the warrants up to 30% below the market price of the common stock, if it so chooses. There are approximately 1,188,600 Class B warrants and approximately 6.6 million primary common shares currently outstanding. Today's closing price of the common shares was $ 6 3/8. It is management's belief that the current share price does not reflect fair value of the Company. In addition, management believes that at least two of its projected milestones will be reached before the new expiration date. Specifically, Ortec expects to file with the FDA FDA abbr. Food and Drug Administration FDA, n.pr See Food and Drug Administration. FDA, n.pr the abbreviation for the Food and Drug Administration. for permission to market its product for the treatment of four skin diseases and complete the enrollment in its pilot venous ulcer Venous ulcers are wounds that are thought to occur due to improper functioning of valves in the veins usually of the legs. They are the major cause of chronic wounds, occurring in 70% to 90% of chronic wound cases. trial along with the release of the preliminary data from that trial. The achievement of these milestones may favorably impact Ortec's share price, thereby potentially increasing the value of the warrants to the warrant holders and the company. The Class B warrants were part of Ortec's initial public offering of its securities in January 1996. Through that offering, Ortec issued 1.2 million units at a price of $5 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one Class A and one Class B warrant with exercise prices of $10 and $15, respectively. In December 1997, the holders of 1,080,000 Class A warrants exercised them providing Ortec with $10.8 million in gross proceeds. The outstanding Class B warrants represent a potential of $17.8 million of gross proceeds to Ortec. Discussing the extension of the Class B warrants, Steven Katz, Ph.D., CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. of Ortec said, "Despite some very meaningful progress over the past few months in our clinical trials, continued interest from potential corporate partners, and transitioning the company to a commercial mode, we believe we have not received the recognition that reflects the value added Value Added The enhancement a company gives its product or service before offering the product to customers. Notes: This can either increase the products price or value. . However, over the course of the coming months, we are hopeful that the specific milestones which we expect to achieve, including applying to the FDA for permission to launch our first commercial product, the presentation of preliminary human clinical data on venous stasis venous stasis Medtalk The pooling of venous blood in a particular region which, in the legs results in edema, hyperpigmentation and possibly ulceration skin ulcers and continuing down the path of securing a meaningful corporate alliance, we will gain the appropriate recognition and thereby provide the opportunity to make these warrants valuable to the company and to our shareholders." About Ortec International, Inc. Ortec International, Inc. is a tissue-engineering company involved in the commercialization of a proprietary and patented technology to s timulate the repair and regeneration of human tissue, such as skin. Ortec believes that its platform technology may extend to the development of other human tissue, such as tendons, ligaments, cartilage, bone, muscle and blood vessels Blood vessels Tubular channels for blood transport, of which there are three principal types: arteries, capillaries, and veins. Only the larger arteries and veins in the body bear distinct names. . Certain statements made in this news release that express the belief, potential anticipation or expectation , as well as other statements which are not historical fact, and statements relating to the clinical trials and their results, design, FDA product approvals or other marketing approvals, features, functionality and performance insofar in·so·far adv. To such an extent. Adv. 1. insofar - to the degree or extent that; "insofar as it can be ascertained, the horse lung is comparable to that of man"; "so far as it is reasonably practical he should practice as they may apply prospectively, are "forward looking" statements within the meaning and pursuant to the Safe Harbor Safe Harbor 1. A legal provision to reduce or eliminate liability as long as good faith is demonstrated. 2. A form of shark repellent implemented by a target company acquiring a business that is so poorly regulated that the target itself is less attractive. provisions of the Securities Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. Reform Act of 1995 and involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in this news release or in other "forward looking" statements presented by management. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, development by the Company's competitors of new technologies or products that are more effective than the Company's, risks of failure of clinical trials, dependence on and retention of key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations, continued availability of raw material for the Company's products, availability of product liability insurance in the event of commercialization of the Company's products, ability to effect transition from pilot-scale manufacturing to large-scale commercial production of products, uncertainty as to the availability of additional capital on acceptable terms, if at all, and the demand for the Company's products, if and when commercially available. |
|
||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion